<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jim Situ's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/befac72e_2d00_6707_2d00_4469_2d00_a76b_2d00_9f738b9a22e9</link><description>Jim Situ's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Design shown after design errors</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/112753/design-shown-after-design-errors</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:08:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9a52c877-e006-4839-8a17-8bcec4c3084b</guid><dc:creator>James Grant</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am getting the following errors when I run a Design All in the RAM Steel BEAM/Joist module. In cases where I can&amp;#39;t get true composite action, I still want to specify the minimum amount of shear studs. What does the module show when I view the design? The design as if the error didn&amp;#39;t exist or taking into account the error?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Number of studs required exceeds maximum rows specified&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Not enough studs for 25% composite action&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Cannot fit enough studs for 25% composite action&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Flange width inadequate for stud rows required&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. Rib spacing is greater than maximum stud spacing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. Rib spacing is greater than user-specified maximum stud spacing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, why does the program specify zero studs sometimes (and then return error 2 above) when I haven&amp;#39;t told it to do this? I have to go in and manually change it in these cases which is a hassle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Deflection Diagram</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/139106/ram-deflection-diagram</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:48:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4bf2aa33-99b5-4ae8-9c98-7bef781be7cb</guid><dc:creator>Jim Situ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was checking how the program calculated the maximum deflection, so I made a 10&amp;#39; by 10&amp;#39; simple test case using composite deck .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284284800v2.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284284800v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Concrete Composite Deck is assigned as follow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284390355v3.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284390355v3.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Deflection of the beam I was checking is the upper edge beam as shown&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284530638v4.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284530638v4.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The distributed load applied on the beam is DL=0.156 klf and LL= 0.05 klf, which is the same as what I hand calculated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284817472v8.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284817472v8.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, using the composite effective moment of Inertia = 109.34in^4, w=0.206 klf and delta = 5wL^4 / (384EI) for simply support beam, I got 0.015 in for deflection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;versus&amp;nbsp;0.038in maximum deflection that the program is showing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284991997v9.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501284991997v9.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501285181662v10.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501285181662v10.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will be helpful if anyone can answer with what load combination the program is using to calculate the maximum deflection&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and why the program is giving me a larger expected deflection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the long message!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>No composite Action for rotated beams</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/139060/no-composite-action-for-rotated-beams</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:44:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3fdc93f9-f3c7-4f6f-af66-dfe5f47ecb88</guid><dc:creator>Jim Situ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/ram-technical.JPG"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/ram-technical.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501188203866v1.png"&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1501188203866v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find out Ram seems doesn&amp;#39;t consider composite action for beams with rotated orientation and I want to know how to include composite actions into my model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone has this issue before?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:52:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:89096231-a3b2-4947-9861-5393d14f212a</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item></channel></rss>