<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Dan Barnhart's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/c4658fc6_2d00_d485_2d00_4e64_2d00_aa27_2d00_8e44a9ee5ac7</link><description>Dan Barnhart's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>CONNECT Standards?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/maryland-dot-acec-md/f/maryland-dot-forum/188847/connect-standards</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 21:01:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dc8c718c-ca27-42ef-a8f1-0a243bdca58e</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good Afternoon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any word on the status of CONNECT standards?&amp;nbsp; I recently checked back for V8i updates but didn&amp;#39;t see anything yet for CONNECT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to get our users around the country up and running on all of the DOTs that have CONNECT WorkSpaces (beta or official) available.&amp;nbsp; We&amp;#39;re currently up and running in a couple of states in full production and doing pilot projects&amp;nbsp;in a few more.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m looking forward to getting our MDSHA users going&amp;nbsp;in CONNECT as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any feedback would be appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dan Barnhart, P.E. | Senior Roadway Engineer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mead &amp;amp; Hunt | 4700 Lakehurst Ct., Suite 110 | Columbus, OH&amp;nbsp; 43016&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Direct: &lt;span class="baec5a81-e4d6-4674-97f3-e9220f0136c1" style="white-space:nowrap;"&gt;614-607-5253&lt;a style="border:currentColor;bottom:0px;display:inline;float:none;height:16px;left:0px;margin:0px;overflow:hidden;right:0px;top:0px;vertical-align:middle;white-space:nowrap;width:16px;" title="Call: 614-607-5253" href="/communities/user_communities/maryland-dot-acec-md/f/maryland-dot-forum/p/addpost"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343663/pastedimage1574283391451v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; | Main: &lt;span class="baec5a81-e4d6-4674-97f3-e9220f0136c1" style="white-space:nowrap;"&gt;614-792-5900&lt;a style="border:currentColor;bottom:0px;display:inline;float:none;height:16px;left:0px;margin:0px;overflow:hidden;right:0px;top:0px;vertical-align:middle;white-space:nowrap;width:16px;" title="Call: 614-792-5900" href="/communities/user_communities/maryland-dot-acec-md/f/maryland-dot-forum/p/addpost"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343663/pastedimage1574283391454v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Dan.Barnhart@meadhunt.com &lt;strong&gt;| &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meadhunt.com/"&gt;meadhunt.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meadhunt.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343663/ZW-flame-logo.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Third-Party Software in Ribbons?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/192055/third-party-software-in-ribbons</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 17:42:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:122c9d95-5c83-4508-8795-5e3acfc06202</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone been able to get their third-party tabs to show up with the OpenRoads Designer CONNECT Edition - 2020 R1 Update 8 (v10.08.00.88) release that just came out?&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m unable to get Cadig&amp;#39;s AutoTable or Transoft&amp;#39;s AutoTurn to show up, despite having the configs looking in the correct places.&amp;nbsp; I can load them via the MDLs and use them via their key-ins, but I can&amp;#39;t get them to show up in the Drawings workflow the way they did prior to my recent update.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve also uninstalled AutoTURN and reinstalled it, but no luck on the ribbon integration.&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Edit the name of an iTwin Design Review Session?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/digital-twin-cloud-services/itwin-services/f/itwin-services-forum/195808/edit-the-name-of-an-itwin-design-review-session</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 16:42:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1d14105b-13f4-496f-b582-cbc4d0eb0108</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to edit the name of an existing iTwin Design Review session?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Survey Manipulators</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-openroads/162050/survey-manipulators</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:15:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1f3a0cb5-768d-48c4-a06b-95828cfac8a4</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a colleague working on a field book file and when he&amp;nbsp;zooms in to get a better look at what he&amp;#39;s working with in congested areas he loses the manipulators.&amp;nbsp; As seen below, they are the orange text on the left image, and when zoomed in a little more they vanish as seen (or not seen) on the right.&amp;nbsp; We played around with the Manipulator Size settings, but while that impacted the appearance, nothing affected how close we could zoom before they disappeared.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know where (or if) this can be adjusted?&amp;nbsp; Is it an OHDOT workspace, workset&amp;nbsp;setting, Bentley config&amp;nbsp;setting, etc.?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;re both running ORD CONNECT Edition - 2018 Release 2 Update 4 - Version 10.04.00.48, utilizing the OHDOT updates from July, 2018.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="136" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343610/pastedimage1534957612189v1.png" width="751" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Notes Updates</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-microstation/158624/notes-updates</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:02:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:aac1085c-1f26-4d03-927d-daf6f8db5f78</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343409/1122.Capture.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can anyone confirm that the Temporary Traffic Control notes from the recent 7/20/18 update work within the Plan Notes VBA?&amp;nbsp; Other notes are working, but I get this error message when trying to use those.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Special Characters in ODOTcadd font?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-openroads/153639/special-characters-in-odotcadd-font</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 18:57:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ec9c2428-d24e-4d83-928c-e55fcb84e246</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Where are the centerline, baseline, flowline, etc. characters in the ODOTcadd font?&amp;nbsp; The pipe, brackets, etc. appear to just be the regular true type characters.&amp;nbsp; Also, they don&amp;#39;t appear when I look in the symbols either.&amp;nbsp; It gets to lowercase omega and then just shows a bunch of question marks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reviewing/Checking OpenRoads Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/151420/reviewing-checking-openroads-model</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:19:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8b6e3664-cc53-4ca4-bffb-69a5be14be4b</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a good method or process for doing an engineering review of a proposed OpenRoads model?&amp;nbsp; I have reviewers that need to check things like they would on a set of plans, i.e. cross slopes, superelevation rates and transitions, grading slopes, etc.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s not&amp;nbsp;a scenario where someone just needs to look at it visually, but one where the actual design is able to be checked.&amp;nbsp; A class on this would be very useful if it doesn&amp;#39;t already exist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:28:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3a6e5456-ea40-4fa7-9460-a99143718a7e</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>OHDOT OpenRoads Designer Connect Edition WorkSpace</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-openroads/146022/ohdot-openroads-designer-connect-edition-workspace</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:06:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9dc86058-8920-41bd-809f-856940a96f9e</guid><dc:creator>Eric Thomas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Ohio Department of Transportation is currently developing a WorkSpace for OpenRoads Designer Connect Edition. The WorkSpace is currently in draft status,&amp;nbsp;undergoing&amp;nbsp;continuous development. The sub-forum is intended to be used for discussion related to the OHDOT WorkSpace, as well as general OpenRoads Designer questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The draft WorkSpace is available for download and comment using the ODOT CADD Support Request form:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="https://odot.formstack.com/forms/cadd_servicerequest"&gt;https://odot.formstack.com/forms/cadd_servicerequest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enhancement requests, questions,&amp;nbsp;and problems may be reported through the CADD Services Support Request form referenced above, or discussed in this forum. Updates to the WorkSpace will be made available periodically and will be announced through the ODOT CADD Standards mailing list as well as&amp;nbsp;this sub-forum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your comments and suggestions are valuable as we continue to develop and refine the WorkSpace.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fonts in Excel for Summary Sheets</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-microstation/135979/fonts-in-excel-for-summary-sheets</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 13:37:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2b5534a1-f204-4010-9f8d-c5ecf89cf3a2</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi JD,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m working on some subsummary/summary sheets and it appears that the &amp;quot;TOTALS CARRIED TO GENERAL SUMMARY&amp;quot; cell in the Subsummary_Full.xlsx file has been changed from Verdana to Arial regular.&amp;nbsp; This results in it coming into the sheets as font 30, along with everything else in the sheet.&amp;nbsp; Is it the DOT&amp;#39;s intention to not use Font 70 for this cell anymore, and to use font 30&amp;nbsp;for the rest of the cells?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Custom Linestyles for Rendering</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-microstation/132309/custom-linestyles-for-rendering</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 19:44:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d460b8ac-d4f6-4bf6-a113-424c7ef1aefb</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m&amp;nbsp;working on some animations and rendering for PI and have discovered that ODOT&amp;#39;s custom linestyles (striping) won&amp;#39;t carry over into LumenRT.&amp;nbsp; Are there any plans to upgrade ODOT&amp;#39;s custom linestyles for this?&amp;nbsp; My understanding is that they&amp;#39;ll need actual widths and geometry to them...unless you just decide to use Bentley&amp;#39;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Plan Note Spelling Errors</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/user_communities/ohio_dot__consultants/f/odot---general-microstation/125167/plan-note-spelling-errors</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:25:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5c6ba73d-4494-46c1-8ee9-5457aa367be1</guid><dc:creator>Dan Barnhart</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been reviewing some plans and have come across a fair amount of spelling errors in the ODOT-provided plan notes.&amp;nbsp; For instance, plan note 642-42 (MOT) has the word &amp;quot;responsible&amp;quot; spelled correctly in the TEM, but has two incorrect spellings of the same word (&amp;quot;responsble&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;responsbile&amp;quot;) in the first and third paragraphs of the .not file.&amp;nbsp; This is just an example of one note in one&amp;nbsp;.not file, but these types of things occur in various files.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Would ODOT be interested in receiving revised versions of these plan notes or is there a chance that someone there can go through these and clean them up?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>