<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jiannan Wang's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/c681e211_2d00_0999_2d00_4fba_2d00_96dc_2d00_cdcc906de3a9</link><description>Recent activity for people in Jiannan Wang's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Beam CS Torsion Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/177143/beam-cs-torsion-design</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:49:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:33a3331c-e7be-44ff-8335-4111dcac964d</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a beam has its behavior set to be &amp;quot;No-torsion&amp;quot; in the &amp;quot;Mesh Input&amp;quot; layer, should its CS torsion design system set to be &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;None&amp;quot; or other?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Slab Deflection Output</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/223582/slab-deflection-output</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:33:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:74e1339b-8813-490a-9be6-574a0367be2a</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In RAM Concept, is there a way to export/output the slab deflection in tabulated format along the line&amp;nbsp;drawn using Selected Plot Distribution or in general?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question II</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/cd3cd235-25c1-476e-bb88-33a5705ca45a</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:35:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3d9e7492-ac34-4463-96a2-d9fc9c888caa</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask 10 questions in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RC Two-way Slab Long-term Deflection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/198344/rc-two-way-slab-long-term-deflection</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:52:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7b94f38a-09cd-4829-97fd-4d226c32e45b</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m studying a two-way RC flat slab for a parking garage. 10&amp;quot; thick, 6000psi concrete, 10psf SDL and 40psf LL. The 5000-day deflection is &lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;3&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt; under 1.0SW+1.0SDL+0.25LL for a 30&amp;#39;X27&amp;#39; interior bay.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the same geometry and concrete strength, SAFE gives &lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;1.5&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt; under the same load combo with nonlinear cracked long-term properties - a creep factor of 2 and shrinkage strain of 0.0005.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why does RAMConcept give a much higher long-term deflection?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Concept creep factor is 3.35&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Concept shrinkage strain is 0.0004&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;shrinkage restraint is 10%&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it true that one needs to calibrate those factors to give a more reasonable long-term deflection for RC slab?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jonathan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM Concept Load History Deflections - Eci</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/192304/ram-concept-load-history-deflections---eci</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:03:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:de4df008-7c96-4e79-ab86-9012506db1ed</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When RAM Concept runs load history slab deflection calculation, does it use the initial elastic modulus Eci for initial stages or does it always use E?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example if I have a load history as the following. Does Concept use Eci for the first 4 steps whose duration is 0?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Load-History.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance for your insight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Column and Wall Rigid Zone</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/184278/column-and-wall-rigid-zone</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:57:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0af5357e-0ba4-4ec4-a2ab-635190d3e584</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am reading a post about modeling in RAM Concept. One of the questions mentioned rigid zones at columns and walls. See the snapshot below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1566312829983v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is what stiffness factors one should use for these rigid zones:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1566312916974v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unusual Load Factors</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/181311/unusual-load-factors</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1bb5931c-a7b0-4d6d-82d8-577b5655a906</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m running a RAM Concept model with customized load combos to consider staged pre-stressing in the PT beams.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following errors occurred while it&amp;#39;s running. My question is if there are some rules i can follow to make sure such errors don&amp;#39;t occur? Also does Concept still check the load combo even if it identifies it as an error?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1560956034899v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Does Class C Apply to PT Two-way Slab</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/178853/does-class-c-apply-to-pt-two-way-slab</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:19:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ba648d50-af59-4afc-ad41-790f745133c6</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m working on a PT two-way slab. Out of curiosity I switched the design environment from Class U to Class C and wanted to see if the design results were the same. Turns out, the design status is the same. Error 18.3.3 still shows up even when the design strip is designed as Class C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that mean RAM Concept assigns Class U to a flat slab automatically? If so, when would Class C apply to a PT two-way slab?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jonathan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PT Beam Shear Capacity</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/177063/pt-beam-shear-capacity</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:37:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a0138293-3c35-4402-bef8-c2eb40842a40</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m designing a one-way slab supported by PT beams.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I audited the cross section that fails in shear, I noticed something strange about the shear demand and capacity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553279668992v7.png" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553279646063v6.png" alt=" " /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553279587299v4.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1553279614311v5.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is one section failing in shear but not the other? Shouldn&amp;#39;t they both be failing? And should we be concerned about RAMConcept&amp;#39;s ability for shear calculation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jonathan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:56:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cd0abd0e-1766-4082-b429-06be440e51c7</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Concept Minimum Bending Capacity</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/156156/concept-minimum-bending-capacity</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:54:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:188d79af-2e19-4c4f-a4ce-289b947e4d00</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In RAM Concept, what&amp;#39;s the difference between minimum bending capacity and maximum bending capacity for a PT slab design strip with no top nor bottom bars? Why are they different for the same section?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="251" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1528818818294v1.png" width="777" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PT Design Strip</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/156157/pt-design-strip</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:02:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:93d66c19-0aba-453a-b5a8-7eb2eecca96e</guid><dc:creator>Jiannan Wang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Both design strips are supported at both ends&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " height="287" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1528818997772v1.png" width="557" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the min demand/ min capacity result:&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " height="175" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1528819134949v3.png" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By simply changing the end condition of the cantilevered span design strip (the end on the slab edge) to non-support, the min demand/ min capacity result becomes:&amp;nbsp;&lt;img alt=" " height="141" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1528819255424v4.png" width="479" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why would Concept add code based minimum top bars in the back span and therefore changing its min bending capacity?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>