<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Alex Piket's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/cdc5fdf8_2d00_5019_2d00_4f9f_2d00_ae23_2d00_c6580927b25b</link><description>Alex Piket's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Change in modal story shear</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/214205/change-in-modal-story-shear</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 04:05:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:10f2d6b0-36c2-4f16-b759-7b3aae5f4841</guid><dc:creator>Alex Piket</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When designing&amp;nbsp;diaphragms&amp;nbsp;for a project, and using ELF, I typically review the change in story shears (in RAM Frame) and multiply the values by the appropriate overstrength factors, where it&amp;#39;s needed.&amp;nbsp; For the same project, and after running a modal analysis, there appears to be a significant shear reversal resulting in large change in story shear values, in one of the stories.&amp;nbsp; Which procedure is more appropriate for the design of diaphragms?&amp;nbsp; Consider sign for analysis results is checked under options.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:35:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5ec6070f-c10f-4d6f-9ffd-26cacae2d7ad</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Cs(max) ASCE 7-16</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/176553/cs-max-asce-7-16</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:05:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:261c0a56-f1d5-4463-a374-9cfe69c255fd</guid><dc:creator>Alex Piket</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The upper value of &amp;#39;Cs&amp;#39; computed in accordance with eq. 12.8-2 need not exceed eq. 12.8-3 or 12.8-4, whichever applies.&amp;nbsp; In Frame, under &amp;#39;Loads and Applied Forces&amp;#39;, this check doesn&amp;#39;t appear to be included.&amp;nbsp; What am I missing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>