<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SAMEER ALSADI's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/d4e12f23_2d00_6b44_2d00_4b01_2d00_a972_2d00_399fa422ba60</link><description>Recent activity for people in SAMEER ALSADI's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Composite floor design in Staad Pro. SS4</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/102859/composite-floor-design-in-staad-pro-ss4</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:05:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c6a4c936-e66e-40e3-94dd-d9f1e5a4a08a</guid><dc:creator>SAMEER ALSADI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Sirs,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please advise for the below issue As soon as possible :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a composite floor for design contains from main beams to columns ( moment connection ), &amp;amp; secondary beams connected to the main beams ( simply connected ) , now I have doubt for which beams I need to define the composite section in Staad pro ?? is it for secondary beams , main beams or Both ?? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if the composite section need to be defined for both , what is the consideration regarding the concrete width of the main beam, as the secondary beams transfer the load to the main beam so the effective width can be defined for the secondary beams but the main beam effective width still my doubt &amp;gt;! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which code supported the composite floor design in STAAD Pro SS4 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking for positive reply ASAP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAM CONNECTION CUSTOM COLUMN SIZE</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/191658/ram-connection-custom-column-size</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:38:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a7738797-fb50-4911-b3fb-f5d58f52669b</guid><dc:creator>SAMEER ALSADI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;could you please advise how to export a custom column size which was made for a RAM connection design , the connection design won&amp;#39;t opened in any other PC if the custom table defined in another PC, the column was tapered and the it was defined designed by our subcontractor and the consultant asked us to provide the tapered column file so he can review the design.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please Advise the plating method for a complex structure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/191455/please-advise-the-plating-method-for-a-complex-structure</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:01:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5a0046a4-d8f8-4e28-ad03-d8774be43bb2</guid><dc:creator>SAMEER ALSADI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please advise what type of method i should follow for meshing a complicated structure , we have trees component from plates and it should support some tensile shade at the top portion, however the important part is the plate application on the tree and branches , i tried to do it manual but almost all plates are warped plates , I&amp;#39;ve checked the warped plate option but it seems all the plates will be warped , could you please advise urgently so we can move forward for the design.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/TREE-STRUCTURE.std"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../TREE-STRUCTURE.std&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 01:17:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ccc47c3c-6f28-4e5f-97ec-2edfdeed76ff</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Problem in the floor loading distribution</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/95102/problem-in-the-floor-loading-distribution</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:50fc5754-f042-4454-a419-b0fb0ddf68fe</guid><dc:creator>SAMEER ALSADI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Engineers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please see the attached file above including pedestrian bridge model, I have started&amp;nbsp;apply the loading on the structure and I found their is problem in floor load distribution. I defined the load&amp;nbsp;to covered the all bridge flooring but when the load distributed automatically, I found some area the load was not included in the distribution.&amp;nbsp;what is the solution of this problem?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and let&amp;nbsp;me know what is your comments on &amp;nbsp;the structural system that I have been used in the design, which is combination of Trusses and moment connection between the trusses members, As they want to install the bridge without interruption of traffic movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SAM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sr.Structural Engineer &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please advise for the truss roofing structure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/95099/please-advise-for-the-truss-roofing-structure</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:54:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:03f300ac-2a87-42eb-b662-634db8919850</guid><dc:creator>SAMEER ALSADI</dc:creator><description>&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Dear Sir,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Please see the above two files for truss roofing structure, I got a problem when I run the analysis for instability and weak spring if I used the specification as truss.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;The second option I used the partial moment release for the truss members and I used MP = 0.99 start and end.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Is the second option correct?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Please advise for the attached files.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>