<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jian Xiao's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/d71b5c2c_2d00_bcc8_2d00_4d98_2d00_9394_2d00_3e1d82696874</link><description>Recent activity for people in Jian Xiao's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:51:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a672e187-9503-4d81-b0b6-441771303b26</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>RAM SS Orthogonal Effect with Redundancy Factor</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/187023/ram-ss-orthogonal-effect-with-redundancy-factor</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:47:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1752548e-bf56-4240-a8ff-c8a97df766bf</guid><dc:creator>Jian Xiao</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a building with two orthogonal braced frame intersecting, which makes one of the column forms both lateral system in the orthogonal direction. Per ASCE 7-10, section 12.5.3.a, Orthogonal Combination Procedure shall apply (see figure 1 below)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1571153355871v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:75%;"&gt;Figure 1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, due to the number of bay of braced frame in each orthogonal direction (2-bay in y-direction and 1-bay in x-direction), per ASCE 7-10, section 12.4.3.2.b, I have used rho of 1.0 and 1.3 in x-direction and y-direction, respectively. (See Figure 2 below)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1571153559896v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:75%;"&gt;Figure 2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, when I output the ASD load combination, I found out that, when RAM detected that the load case contains the force in the direction which requires rho of 1.3, regardless of whether it is in 100% or 30% due to orthogonal effect, the entire load combination gets amplified by rho factor.&amp;nbsp;With that said, since I have applied orthogonal effect per code, basically all the load case will contain the x-direction load, regardless of whether it is in 100% or 30%, the entire load case was multiplied by 1.3. But then the advantage of reducing redundancy with 2-bay will be lost.(See Figure 3 below).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1571154107475v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="199" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1571154229484v4.png" width="219" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My interpretation of the load comb is that 0.91E_9 = 0.7*1.3*(0.3Ex+Ey) = &lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;font-family:inherit;"&gt;0.7*1.3*0.3*Ex+0.7*&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;"&gt;1.3&lt;/span&gt;*Ey&lt;/span&gt;. However, I believe the correct load comb shall be &lt;span style="background-color:#ffff00;font-family:inherit;"&gt;0.7*1.3*0.3*Ex + 0.7*Ey.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be great if I can get some ideas how to solve this and take advantage of the rho=1.0 in y-direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>