<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>TimZ's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/dab5ea72_2d00_8122_2d00_404d_2d00_95e8_2d00_177f8f6d06c5</link><description>TimZ's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>InRoads S&amp;amp;S Curved Pipe Elevations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/108159/inroads-s-s-curved-pipe-elevations</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:23:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6c67e34d-472b-40d9-a3f2-f1a89546177f</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When placing curved pipes in sanitary sewer, I am able to assign an invert in and an invert out with a given radius.&amp;nbsp; However, when the graphic is drawn on the screen, it is drawing the pipe with elevations at the &amp;ldquo;in&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;out&amp;rdquo;, and &amp;ldquo;midpoint&amp;rdquo; as the average of the entered invert values.&amp;nbsp; The pipe is also showing up on the cross sections at the average elevation and not the elevations it should be at that given cross section.&amp;nbsp; I did an edit/review of the pipe and confirmed that the inverts I entered were still as I intended them to be.&amp;nbsp; What is the fix for this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Does PondPack calculate velocity from outlet structure?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/106447/does-pondpack-calculate-velocity-from-outlet-structure</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:55:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8453d821-0e10-45e2-96ec-4d6a54eee3d3</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After designing an outlet structure and running the storms through it, is there a way to determine the velocity discharging from the outlet pipe/culvert?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bently PondPack V8i Problem - Adding engineering library from ProjectWise</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/107254/bently-pondpack-v8i-problem---adding-engineering-library-from-projectwise</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 11:55:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:219c69b4-bfbd-4971-9c73-a51a039eea34</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m attempting to set up my project to work&amp;nbsp;out of&amp;nbsp;ProjectWise. I have my model set up and working fine, but I cannot get the engineering library containing my rainfall curve&amp;nbsp;to load. When I attempt to add my library to my model using the &amp;quot;ProjectWise add existing library...&amp;quot; option,&amp;nbsp;I get an error stating &amp;quot; The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add. Try inserting or pasting less data.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To make sure my .xml file was ok, I copied it to my desktop. Then I went into my model (Still using ProjectWise) and I was able to successfully load the library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you need a better explanation, please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TimZ&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PondPack Report Builder Wrapping of last column</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/106050/pondpack-report-builder-wrapping-of-last-column</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a1b10422-2261-4582-ab7f-6ed355095b69</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am using PondPack V8i [08.11.01.56].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When&amp;nbsp;I generate&amp;nbsp;a report using the Report Builder, it always wraps the last column underneath the table, as seen below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/example3.gif"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/example3.gif" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have tried all the things that Scott Kampa suggested in his post on the wiki &lt;a title="(Link)" href="/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/5925/p/addpost/(http:/communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/w/hydraulics_and_hydrology__wiki/20428.the-columns-in-the-reports-created-from-report-builder-are-wrapping-around-to-the-next-line-how-can-this-be-adjusted"&gt;http://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/w/hydraulics_and_hydrology__wiki/20428.the-columns-in-the-reports-created-from-report-builder-are-wrapping-around-to-the-next-line-how-can-this-be-adjusted&lt;/a&gt; however none of these worked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far I&amp;#39;ve:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Set my printer to Adobe PDF and attempted to&amp;nbsp;print the report that way&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adjusted the margins numerous times (0.5in, 0.25in, 0in)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adjusted the page size and layout (11x17 and landscape)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Exported the report to different formats (.csv,.txt, .html, .pdf)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When exporting the report to the different formats, I found that they still put the column under the table or they were formatted weird.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, in the .csv file, there is an open spot for the column, but it still places it under the overall table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/example.gif"&gt;&lt;img width="683" height="552" style="width:451px;height:361px;" src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/example.gif" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also did the steps to provide the old PondPack output, however, it provided much more information that I needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only thing I haven&amp;#39;t done yet was start the program is Safe Mode, however I don&amp;#39;t think I have administrative privileges to do this at work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TimZ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pond Inflow and Target Outflow Problem?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/103006/pond-inflow-and-target-outflow-problem</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:39:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c518c8cd-946f-4e9f-99cc-61c27d63c62a</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem occurs in the design configuration step of Pondmaker. The 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, and 50 yr storm events are working properly. In these cases, the pond inflow is greater than the target outflow indicating the need for a basin. However, for the 100yr storm event, this flips and the inflow is less than the target outflow. When this happens, there is an error when the storage estimate is computed and a basin cannot be designed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first thing I did was decrease the output increments from 3 min to 1 min. This did help a little, but the inflow is still less than the outflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the attached file, you will see my model with two basins. Basin 10&amp;nbsp;is the basin with this specific problem. In addition, you will see Basin 9.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now Basin&amp;nbsp;9 has a similar problem that I&amp;#39;ve run into before.&amp;nbsp;Here, all the storms have a pond inflow less than the target inflow. To me, this means that a&amp;nbsp;basin is not necessary&amp;nbsp;for this given situation. I just want to verify that this is true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you in advance for your help&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/SWB9_2C00_10.zip"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../SWB9_2C00_10.zip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to accurately model a culvert in PondPack V8i</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/103362/how-to-accurately-model-a-culvert-in-pondpack-v8i</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:51:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0b7331c0-a4dd-411d-89c3-7ff56a678942</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am in the process of refining some of my models and I was wondering what is the most accurate way of modeling a typical culvert that diverts a stream under a road?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, lets say&amp;nbsp;I have Catchment A that flows into a stream. The stream then flows south&amp;nbsp;for 100&amp;#39;&amp;nbsp;to a large culvert. The culvert goes under the road for 50&amp;#39; and&amp;nbsp;at this point, Catchment B&amp;nbsp;flows into the stream. The stream then continues&amp;nbsp;for another 100&amp;#39; before coming to an outfall. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, I would have Catchment A flow to a Junction (say J1), model the stream as a conduit for 100&amp;#39; from J1 to a new junction (J2) right before the Culvert. I would then model the Culvert as a new Conduit traveling for 50&amp;#39; from J2 to J3.&amp;nbsp;Then I would add Catchment&amp;nbsp;B and have it flow to J3. Finally, I would&amp;nbsp;connect J3 with the outfall using another 100&amp;#39; long conduit modeled as the stream.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I hesitate to do this, because I know that conduits are supposed to represent open channels and not pipes. And since the Culvert is in theory &amp;quot;piping&amp;quot; the stream under the road, it is&amp;nbsp;not an open channel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I suppose you could also just do all that mumbo jumbo above within the travel time calculations of each catchment. In which case, there would be no need to model anything I mentioned above, besides the two catchments flowing to&amp;nbsp;the same&amp;nbsp;outfall.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So to sum everything up, which is the better method of modeling such a scenario? Model the stream then culvert, then the stream again, or just include all that in the travel times of the individual catchments?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TimZ&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>PondPack V8i - 0 Flow for a post development scenario</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/102381/pondpack-v8i---0-flow-for-a-post-development-scenario</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:33:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c3caa826-ff35-40e6-9652-444d175c25ce</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I need to generate a hydrograph at a&amp;nbsp;POI for a pre- and post-development scenario for a typical 2-yr 24hr storm. When I obtain a hydrograph for my pre-development scenario it generates an appropriate hydrograph. However, when I try to generate a hydrograph for my post development scenario, it does not generate a hydrograph at all. It shows a flow of 0 ft^3/s for the entire duration. I don&amp;#39;t understand what is happening, as I have the correct storms in my &amp;quot;Global storm data&amp;quot; and from what I understand, they should be applied to all scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am fairly new to this program and have gone through most of&amp;nbsp;the tutorials on Bentley&amp;#39;s LMS, but I cannot find a solution to this specific question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, is there a way to generate a combined hydrograph of lets say a pre and post 2 year storm event at a specific POI?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tim&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why are my storm estimates so low in Pondmaker?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/102785/why-are-my-storm-estimates-so-low-in-pondmaker</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:33:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:425ad493-fedf-4d78-aef0-895f0399db29</guid><dc:creator>TimZ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am currently designing a basin in Pondmaker. Everything goes smoothly until I run my outlet design. When I do, the program estimates my storm elevations at a very low depth as seen in the first picture below. I then continue to route the storms through my pond, and the elevations immediately jump up (as seen in the second photo). My question is how can I get the program to accurately estimate the storm elevations?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/outlet-curve.gif"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/outlet-curve.gif" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/routing-curve.gif"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/routing-curve.gif" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>