<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Roger Margerison's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/dd642546_2d00_43a4_2d00_440a_2d00_bfa0_2d00_684bbd7331df</link><description>Roger Margerison's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Importing an image log into gINT</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/115975/importing-an-image-log-into-gint</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c35187ba-a270-4ce1-b185-658635188c74</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Little</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an unwrapped televiewer and 3D core image logs from WellCAD that I would like to import into a gINT log at the proper scale so the depths match. How do I do this? I&amp;#39;ve tried using bitmap symbols but they add black lines to the top and bottom of the image throwing off the depth and they are also discreet images that plot on a single page rather than log data that scales to depth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>gINT 10.00.01.17</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/174384/gint-10-00-01-17</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:35:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:fdc83b78-0422-4f87-8ba0-4eea3f2444be</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Doe not appear to work!&amp;nbsp; Consistently get a &amp;quot;gINT has stopped working&amp;quot; dialog.&amp;nbsp; Reinstalled 10.00.00.69 and no problem.&amp;nbsp; This does mean I cannot look at AGS files with Excel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suggestions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Readme: gINT CONNECT Edition (Logs, Professional, Professional Plus) 10.00.00.69</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/m/mediagallery/273426</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:54:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a4bfc9b5-a68f-4439-b0ba-498701a9850f</guid><dc:creator>Kirk Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>AGS Import</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/159237/ags-import</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7f918d77-3fcb-417c-91aa-24cf7a57f7d9</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have imported an AGS 3.1 data file into gINT using the 3.1 to 4 correspondence file.&amp;nbsp; Everything works fine including contaminant data with the sole exception of pH results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any explanation for this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Decimal places on Fence axis</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/147285/decimal-places-on-fence-axis</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:03:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b516133d-8eac-49f3-8cb0-0a1ffd7fd881</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please can anybody point me in the right direction to set the number of decimal places on fence axes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect it&amp;#39;s simple - just can&amp;#39;t seem to find it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fences, drapes and drawings</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/147286/fences-drapes-and-drawings</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:37:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:31301ce4-8d57-4d7a-beb6-8831f939dff8</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a means of copying a geological boundary line added to a fence drawing (.gdw) to a fence drape.&amp;nbsp; Copy - paste does not work well as the line is based on the drawing coordinates rather than the fence parameters.&amp;nbsp; I realise I could re-scale the pasted element but this is not particularly accurate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>ERES Import Stalling</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/146417/eres-import-stalling</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:43:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a05faa21-a9a9-4329-85ec-2f4c1e0ec21b</guid><dc:creator>Paul Chaplin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have setup a brand new project using the &amp;#39;gINT Std AGS 4_0&amp;#39; Data Template, using the &amp;#39;gINT Std AGS 4_0&amp;#39; library.&amp;nbsp; This is using Connect Edition as gINT Professional v10.00.00.50.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I import a standard AGS 4.0 file that has been issued to us via a client (stringently checked both structurally and content-wise by them when received from their contractor) it is stalling during the import of the ERES table and gINT gets to the point of &amp;#39;Not Responding&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All files are on my local machine.&amp;nbsp; All files to be imported are on the local machine.&amp;nbsp; This has been tried on multiple AGS 4.0 files provided by the client which resulted in the same outcome - the only difference being the percentage at which the process stopped (93% on one file and 63% on the other).&amp;nbsp; To get an idea of numbers one of the files had around 7,700 results in the ERES table (only 4,600) were imported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any known issues / fixes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to retain Solid Fill color in DXF output?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/144555/how-to-retain-solid-fill-color-in-dxf-output</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:38:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:550cd381-f1fd-4bfe-a6a6-ade6c9af0ed1</guid><dc:creator>William Ladd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to output a fence diagram that has the strata as colored solid fills to a DXF file, so that we can use the fence posts in a DWG drawing. The dxf is output with all the solid fills as one color on layer 0, and if I retain layering, each post is on its own layer with each a different color (all strata in each post is the same color).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to set the output such that the original solid fill colors are retained in the output?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Alignment Initial Station</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/139840/alignment-initial-station</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:06:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1b525084-6cf8-462c-a494-c4646ad59d4b</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a tunnel alignment (L to R) along which I am producing a Fence Report. &amp;nbsp;In order to pick up a borehole to the left of the start of the alignment, I have added an extra 20m to the alignment following the same direction as the first segment. &amp;nbsp;This obviously means my fence line now begins at a point 20m before the actual tunnel. &amp;nbsp;So to correct for this I have put -20 into the initial station field for the alignment (previously 0m).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is where the &amp;#39;fun&amp;#39; starts. &amp;nbsp;When the alignment stations are refreshed it reports that the distance to the second station is at chainage +4.9 (I would expect it to report zero or very close)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502893196041v2.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502893196041v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the Initial Station is set to -19.9 the adjustment is correct at 0.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502893962345v3.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502893962345v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Out of interest I have plotted the error in distance to the second station (what should be chainage 0m) &amp;nbsp;against initial station values between 19.85 and 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502895937339v5.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/283906/pastedimage1502895937339v5.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Something is not quite right!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 02:28:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:13e7e3a1-f528-416a-a75d-b7ebbaa55da7</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Site layouts and plans in Fences</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/139650/site-layouts-and-plans-in-fences</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:15:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9fca11e5-6ca9-44f3-836d-3da7a60b09be</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do very large green circles appear at borehole locations in the site layouts when developing and reporting fences, obliterating everything? &amp;nbsp;This is project related as other projects are fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question II</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/cd3cd235-25c1-476e-bb88-33a5705ca45a</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 02:28:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:409e6720-03b2-4e52-9774-641289c23f0e</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask 10 questions in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Particle Size Distribution chart - Multiple curves colored according to soil units</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/128853/particle-size-distribution-chart---multiple-curves-colored-according-to-soil-units</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:34:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6dad17e3-f76a-48c1-a1a5-c521c1473428</guid><dc:creator>daniele bertalot</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to plot multiple PSD curves on a single Graph in order to compare them. I&amp;#39;d like the curves to be coloured according to the soil units assigned to the depth interval at which the PSD was executed. I managed to have data marker colored &amp;#39;by unit&amp;#39; using the following expression in the field &amp;#39;Data Marker Color Expression 1&amp;#39; from Tab &amp;#39;Override Line/DM expression&amp;#39;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;Lookup(&amp;lt;&amp;lt;UNITS.Color&amp;gt;&amp;gt;,&amp;lt;&amp;lt;GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS.Unit&amp;gt;&amp;gt;)&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t seem to be able to do the same for the lines connecting the data markers... any suggestions? My graph look likes the image attached below..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Daniele&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re-coding entries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/130615/re-coding-entries</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:28:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7ae41683-97c5-412c-ae39-6f73fda92b9b</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, by all means send me the link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have two AGS data sets that I am importing into a single project. &amp;nbsp;All is fine except that the Geology codes for each unit are different. &amp;nbsp;How one set of codes be converted to their equivalent in the other data set? &amp;nbsp;I feel this should be possible using correspondence files but from what I have seen so far this just relates to mapping one field to an other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other thoughts I have had are to do a &amp;#39;text replacement&amp;#39; in an excel version of one of the AGS files or whether some sort of alias field can be added to the Field Geologic Code table and a rule implemented to replace the relevant codes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any suggestions welcomed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Consolidating data and reporting</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotechnical1/f/geotechnical-forum/129636/consolidating-data-and-reporting</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:29:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cb434260-f11a-4bf4-a5ae-7c2ecf99cebb</guid><dc:creator>Roger Margerison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am in the process of creating a shaft summary log. &amp;nbsp;This will developed from a &amp;#39;Design Borehole&amp;#39; that will contain the stratigraphic and lithological assessment. &amp;nbsp;To this I want to add collections of data (SPT, lab test results etc) from surrounding boreholes as consolidated plots and graphs on the summary log. &amp;nbsp;I can link to an individual borehole using the Foreign Point ID but not several.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The obvious mechanism would be to make use of zone filters in the plot definitions but I cannot see how to do this (if at all possible)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My thoughts on an alternative workaround would be to report the data / results using a zone filter to a new table but I am struggling here too without exporting to excel and re-importing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any advice would be welcomed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roger&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>