<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Landon Harman's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/dfc9a334_2d00_fd54_2d00_49a7_2d00_821f_2d00_cf3abe380bf5</link><description>Landon Harman's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Identify cracked elements in RAM Concept</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/97362/identify-cracked-elements-in-ram-concept</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 17:25:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:259e6772-cf8e-4760-996e-79dc99f37e72</guid><dc:creator>Landon Harman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to identify/see/plot which elements in a flat RC slab are cracked at the end of RAM Concept&amp;#39;s analysis?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d like to be able to compare the deflection results that RAM Concept calculates with those produced by a consultant in a generic FEA program, but I need to get an understanding of whether we&amp;#39;re using the same baseline assumptions.&amp;nbsp;In the generic program, the slab must be &amp;quot;softened&amp;quot; using a cracked section factor which assumes a certain percentage of the slab has cracked and results in an effective moment of inertia. Since RAM adjusts the stiffness of each element depending on whether or not it cracks, I&amp;#39;d like to have RAM output WHICH elements are cracked and which are using gross section properties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there&amp;nbsp;a table or plot that can show this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Modelling eccentricity of columns with cantilever beams in RAM SS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/99219/modelling-eccentricity-of-columns-with-cantilever-beams-in-ram-ss</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9124c573-36e8-4ae7-a8a6-48c92567d527</guid><dc:creator>Landon Harman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have a situation where an existing building utilizes platform-framed construction and several columns have beams with 10&amp;#39;-0&amp;quot; cantilevers which run over top of them. We do not feel it&amp;#39;s conservative to assume a perfect fulcrum (i.e. zero eccentricity) if only due to erection tolerances. Is there some workaround we can use to induce eccentricity in these columns?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using the manual override doesn&amp;#39;t work as RAM SS still assumes zero eccentricity (and hence zero bending moment) and using a stub cantilever beam (as opposed to a cantilever extension) induces ALL of the moment in the column. We&amp;#39;d like Ram to recognize the user input eccentricity, is there any way to make that happen?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Landon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>