<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Mohamad Azzam's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/dfdbc885_2d00_35e2_2d00_4b58_2d00_a731_2d00_19762240d730</link><description>Mohamad Azzam's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Outfall Upstream catchment in SewerGEMS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/243774/outfall-upstream-catchment-in-sewergems</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:18:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bebfc7c9-9dec-4d72-b1b4-cc874cd7b5d0</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The catchment in SewerGEMS (Stand Alone) are still not considered as being &amp;quot;upstream&amp;quot; and will not be selected when using the &amp;quot;Trace upstream&amp;quot; Network Navigator query, we need to select the contributed catchment to the specified outfall, I found that could be a workaround in &amp;quot;SewerGEMS for ArcMap&amp;quot; but we need that feature in the stand alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;another feature&amp;nbsp;is really required in the Stand alone version is snapping tools specially to allocate the Tap exactly&amp;nbsp;(x,y) to the pipe.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Total Volume at the outfall in SewerGEMS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/243320/total-volume-at-the-outfall-in-sewergems</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 08:56:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a4da2922-2401-411c-940a-0c1e59d43977</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In the new version of the SewerGEMS (10.04.00.158) We are able to generate the total volume at the outfall as a graph only, however&amp;nbsp;the values are not available in the Data (refer to the screenshots below).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover the total volume of the outfall element does not display yet in the outfall&amp;#39;s properties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/g1.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1679644638311v7.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SewerGEMS-Object reference not set to an instance of an object</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/242875/sewergems-object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:34:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:18a4c10d-e2f5-46ee-8ffb-5fb56efa4c95</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Refer the posti n this link:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/241699/object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object"&gt;Object reference not set to an instance of an object.&amp;#39;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have the same message, and I followed the steps in the above link but still the issue is exist. actually the model is running in previous version SS2 without this new problem, but the problem appears when I received the model and I am opening it in the latest version SS4 (10.04.00.158).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I upload the model as received in version SS2 in the shared link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1678786457562v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following screenshot is appeared after I import only the database and did validate, then the program crashed and I sent a report.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1678786564431v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SewerGEMS Schema Update</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/242458/sewergems-schema-update</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 18:10:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8e1ff061-7cdc-4cc1-af25-67f0e18c84a2</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Using the new version of SewerGEMS Version (10.04.00.158) takes a very long time to open the model, the opening always gets stuck at&amp;nbsp;Schema Update as shown in the screenshot below&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The model is uploaded at Bentley Sharing Files&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1677953298699v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Export Profiles in SewerGEMS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/240055/export-profiles-in-sewergems</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 11:49:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:81115bb9-5ad4-41fc-9ecc-a561854e5352</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The model I have has many of the profiles created by Auto Create Profiles, we need to export them to CAD format, however that will be one by one, is there away to export all the profiles from the list to one cad sheet?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second request is: we prefer to export the profiles to civil 3D format (to use part list), or if provide an option to export the profile list alignment; meaning for each profile (from &amp;quot;Manhole Name&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; To &amp;quot;Manhole Name&amp;quot;) as a single alignment so when export the network to shape files and import it to the civil 3D so the alignment will help us to produce profiles in the civil 3D.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1672660668026v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Long Time to open The model_SewerGEMS</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/239302/long-time-to-open-the-model_sewergems</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 12:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6786d3c0-f335-4d8c-bea6-7ea63681b707</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The SewerGEMS model is shared on Bentley drive is taking very long time to open, in spite of the Tracking feature is closed the model is really annoying with the long time opening, that with the latest version, I also tried top test that on the SewerGEMS SS4 (10.04.00.145) and still taking long time till the model appears (more than 15 minutes to open). that on the work station computer with SSD drive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Flooding issue in Tanks Evacuation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/238079/flooding-issue-in-tanks-evacuation</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 18:16:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:22349f59-c578-40a9-9e3e-70ae5a707bf2</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am modelling evacuation tanks in SewerGEMS, the tank presented as ponds in the model for volume purposes and to use the control structure, the model is shared in the Bentley sharing server is showing the Evacuation line scenario, in that scenario for example in case evacuate tank 3 to tank 5 the line between the two tanks are flooded in spite the water level balance in the tanks when they balanced is entirely below the ground elevation and the manholes, in reality, should not be flooded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking for the reason why that flood happened in order to solve the flood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1667929895344v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1667929944357v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Calculation of Time of Concentration in StormCAD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/237701/calculation-of-time-of-concentration-in-stormcad</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:21:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:16e59cef-ac96-4129-a57b-ef0424ce144e</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ref:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/156541/time-of-concentration_stormcad"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/156541/time-of-concentration_stormcad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reference to the post in the above link; need just to confirm they way that StormCAD considers the time of concentration and accordingly the intensity from the IDF curve,&amp;nbsp;from the above post the &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;system flow time&amp;quot; is not added to the &amp;quot;entry time&amp;quot;, then Jesse added ( &amp;quot;this is unrelated unless the conduits in your model are considered to be part of the &amp;quot;catchment&amp;quot; area ).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In some manual they mention that the summation&amp;nbsp;of the entry time and the travel time is the total of Time of concentration &amp;quot;TC&amp;quot; that will reflecting the intensity&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1667218473072v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;That required more iteration, also is that realistic in rational methods? or since the catchments has no piping system and they are just connected to the inlets so we just consider the entry time?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I am looking for more interpretation&amp;nbsp;to the screenshot; when that can be used? and is the Time of concentration in the StormCAD just based on the entry time &amp;quot;to the catchment&amp;#39;s outflow/discharge point -&amp;nbsp;outflow node&amp;quot; and the travel time is not contributing&amp;nbsp;with the Intensity calculation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ponded Area for Modeling Storm Water With Catch Basin</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/236762/ponded-area-for-modeling-storm-water-with-catch-basin</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:06:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d899338f-907c-44cf-9280-5800e2f1462c</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When create a Storm Water model equipped with catch basins elements and gutters; do we apply &amp;quot;Ponded Area&amp;quot; to the catch basins?&amp;nbsp;Is it usually for the Manholes only or it is recommended to do applying that to the Inlets as well, especially we are creating a model for the existing system which already under sized and facing a flooding issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it is recommended to add &amp;quot;Ponded Area&amp;quot; to the inlets, what is technical reason in terms of modelling ? and need an advise how to define that with respect to the curb&amp;#39;s height and the flood volume?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Curb Inlet on Grade Efficiency</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/236247/curb-inlet-on-grade-efficiency</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:12:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7d1c8d8b-d7c8-4449-9ecb-301e41ae2759</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I checked SewerGEMS help and found Bentley SWMM is using HEC-22 equation to calculate the inlet efficiency, is that correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;upon reviewing the efficiency calculated by the model for example (&lt;strong&gt;CB-433&lt;/strong&gt;)&amp;nbsp;in the shared model with scenario &amp;quot;5 Year 45 minutes&amp;quot; and perform the hand calculation as in the shared excel sheet; I would clarify the followings;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1- does SewerGEMS calculate the inlet efficiency as per HEC-22 shown in the help?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2- why the hand calculation does not match with the model results as shown in the shared excel? can you provide an excel modified in case there is a mistake in my excel for verification?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3- would you please elaborate why the graph in the efficiency does not back to 100%, it ended to the end of simulation at 40% ? while the excel shows the graph back to 100?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS: in the same shared model; when I do zoom extend the model does not extend and I zoom little out I saw many dash lines, I did compact Database and Update Database Cache but still the problem there (Screenshot is below).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The model and the excel are shared in Bentley Share Drive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1664365580419v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1664366260785v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1664367146038v4.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Batch Run</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/236176/batch-run</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:50:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1fffabac-e6e2-4274-a8b1-9b896cf0f1db</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;when do batch run for many scenarios, is there away or will be in future to display which scenario is running? also if I am running 20 scenarios to display where reach of running (for example 4 of 20), or time remaining?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so that could at citrine point to decide if I need to abort the batch or wait till finish&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1664261198625v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pond Flooding</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/235807/pond-flooding</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:01:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9a82fc6a-0dbd-4992-a7b6-b17e4aabd0f4</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The model in the sharing server is showing that (pond-1) is flooding and that is shown in the HGL graph for scenario &amp;quot;FEH_50YRS 1440 MIN) when that scenario runs for 10 days, the problem that the pond is designed to handle around (527,000 cu.m) and the total volume generated from the model catchment to that pond is around (450,000 cu.m), meaning that pond should not show any flooding.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another model &amp;quot;Test Pond Flood&amp;quot; which is also shared is created to double-check, where in this model the hydrograph has been copied from the last manhole (MH-2-1) in the original model and injected into the Test model, also other physical elements from the last manhole (MH-2-1) to the pond has been created in the new model, so the test model shows the expected results correctly and the (pond-1) is not flooded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I re-run the original model with lower routing time steps (1 sec), but that does not change the flooding issue at the (pond-1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Graph from the original model shows the HGL reaches the top of the pond&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1663610321894v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This Graph from the&amp;nbsp;Test model shows the HGL does not reach to the top of the pond&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1663610392803v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>HGL spike at manhole</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/235249/hgl-spike-at-manhole</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:10:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b8562477-57fd-4386-bd6a-f2411b515417</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I got a no sense spike for the HGL starting at manhole (MH-2-8-1-2-R6) as shown in the screenshot below and the shared Model, that due to the flooding which no expectation to have any flooding there at scenario (FEH-5YR&amp;nbsp;120MIN), because the other scenario (&lt;span&gt;FEH-10YR&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;120MIN)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;with with higher rain event does not have any issue, the physical and the alternative checked and compared without any error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1662645552218v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Display Volume graph at the outfall</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/234954/display-volume-graph-at-the-outfall</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 20:21:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b3df2183-1c00-4df3-a43f-ad5182b0b556</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In SewerGEMS; I am still facing a very long time to display the volume at the outfall at end of the simulation, after sliding the timer to the end then I do right click on the outfall (O-15) in scenario &amp;quot;FEH_50 YRS 1440&amp;quot; that scenario run for 10 days. the program is responding after a very long time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This problem still exists in spite of applying the latest Patch received (Patch 48) and deleting the results after moving the model to a C drive (SSD).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have noticed that running that scenario only will make the model folder size (10.5 GB), it is really very big and hope to consider decreasing the size in future development.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The model copy is uploaded.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1662062594647v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/2022_2D00_09_2D00_01_5F00_23_2D00_55_2D00_59.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1662063446444v5.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Very Long Time to open The SeweGEMS model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/haestad-hydraulics-and-hydrology-forum/230474/very-long-time-to-open-the-sewegems-model</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 13:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8956519c-d4b5-4375-beba-fc539442c251</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Azzam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Greetings,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In spite of the SewerGEMS model running became faster but after running the scenarios and saving the model in the local drive, once we went back to open the model it took a very long time (8minutes).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second problem in the Scenario &amp;quot;FEH_50YRS_1440MIN-Free outfall&amp;quot; is when need to check the outfall properties and volume it takes a very long time to see the results at end of the simulation, outfall (O-2).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The model is uploaded without run due to the bigger size and needs to Patch runs the all 10 Years scenarios and 50 Years scenarios in order to produce the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1653658431225v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1653658456969v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5925/pastedimage1653659313883v3.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mohamad Azzam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>