<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Benjamin Du's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/e1bdfc9d_2d00_7168_2d00_498a_2d00_a1db_2d00_d7530a2737fb</link><description>Recent activity for people in Benjamin Du's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Water pressure in the gap between pile and soil</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/219674/water-pressure-in-the-gap-between-pile-and-soil</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:477e2581-b2a3-4354-98b3-669bce8f4b3a</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Du</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="197" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1631952059624v1.png" width="214" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:150%;"&gt;Hello, I have a doubt whether the Plaxis-3D could simulate the water pressure in the gap between pile and soil. The background of this is when cyclic load applied at the offshore monopile, the gap would appear at least on one side of pile, which would reduce the lateral capacity of soil. I know in the&amp;nbsp;Plaxis-3D,&amp;nbsp;gap closure is setup to adjust the interface condition, where compression takes effect until there is contact&amp;nbsp;between the&amp;nbsp;pile and the soil, when the load is reversed. But in the process of this, dose water pressure in the gap will take effect, as I marked in the above picture? If so, how could be proved?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>波浪谱疲劳分析提取结构特定位置的疲劳荷载（荷载幅值和循环次数）？</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/197971/thread</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 03:41:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:634315d6-f0c7-4cd4-8b71-a2d59b97c4a8</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Du</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;如题，&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;"&gt;是否可以在结构波浪谱疲劳分析计算中，提取结构特定位置的疲劳荷载（荷载幅值和循环次数）？&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SACS读取时序风机载荷错误</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/197632/sacs</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 02:37:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9f007282-1649-4e3f-8247-72de79a730d9</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Du</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;"&gt;海上风机时序波浪、风机载荷动力响应时，在SACS输入基础顶的风机载荷（6个自由度载荷）。在计算文件WVRNCF查看输入的时程载荷，发现FX\FY\FZ\MZ都和输入载荷完全匹配，但是MX/MY载荷出现不匹配。这是什么原因造成的？突然发现两年前的一次模拟也有类似现象。相关证据如下：&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;第一幅图以MX载荷示例&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;"&gt;，A处数据为bladed提供的基础顶载荷，B处为force time history input file文件载荷，C处为&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#000000;float:none;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;"&gt;WVRNCF&lt;/span&gt;文件的载荷。A和B相同，说明我输入SACS没有问题，和C有区别说明SACS读取出现错误。同样，也可以从MX两个时程图的峰值发现两者的差异。&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#000000;float:none;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-decoration:none;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;"&gt;第二幅图以&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;"&gt;MZ显示为例，数据完全吻合。&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="background-color:#ffffff;"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343644/pastedimage1590114571837v1.png" alt=" " /&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343644/pastedimage1590114868358v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>关于风机机头叶轮的模拟问题</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/177161/thread</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:20:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:be268fac-d61f-482e-bb3f-44c99e7247bc</guid><dc:creator>wuxmei@sh163.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;关于风机机头叶轮的模拟问题： 在风机-基础结构计算过程中，风机机头叶轮一般通过添加质量点的方式进行模拟，但是这样就忽略了机头与叶轮的转动特性，如何在sacs中添加结构的转动惯量呢？（只有质量点，无实体模型；转动惯量已经计算得出）&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SACS软件中LRFD和WSD，在设置上有哪些主要区别？</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/177119/sacs-lrfd-wsd</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:39:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:aa0bbcc1-63e9-485b-858f-d12244403f7b</guid><dc:creator>中油奥特雷勇</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;海上升压站的结构设计规定使用荷载抗力系数法（如LRFD API RP2A 1st）。请问SACS软件中应用LRFD和WSD，在设置上有哪些主要区别？&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>effect of flooded on frequency</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/184243/effect-of-flooded-on-frequency</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 01:32:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:eb4aa131-f065-4a6d-bae1-f65c61abfd9f</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Du</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;当前考虑海洋结构物的模态计算法为一致质量方法（consistent approach）。浸没在水下的杆件要设置为flooded，这个设置对模态有一定影响。请问，管内的水是如何参与到模态计算当中的，是当作结构的一部分吗？跟Bladed对比，Bladed当中也有flooded设置，此外还有一个sealed的概念，即水在管内是封闭的还是可以自由进出的。发现这些设置对同样模型下的频率有影响。&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>桩土文件中土参数和p-y曲线混用</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/182693/p-y</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:07:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9ed2b06b-6952-4598-9088-d41a9a705d83</guid><dc:creator>Benjamin Du</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;尝试，在桩土文件中土参数的输入和p-y曲线的输入是可以共存计算的。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;请问是否确认过这样计算土反力和桩变形的准确性？&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343644/pastedimage1563437053360v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>桩基竖向承载力计算的问题</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/communities/other_communities/chinafirst/f/sacs-moses-maxsurf/175315/thread</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:21:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b155144f-d038-48fb-9eb4-17daf8bc27a9</guid><dc:creator>wuxmei@sh163.net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PSI帮助文件中提供了如下三种计算竖向承载力的方法，请问在psiinp文件中分别是如何体现的？（相关设置参数在哪里？）&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;使用SACS axial adhesion(即输入各土层侧摩阻力值)计算出来的桩基竖向承载力（抗力）与使用规范手动计算（侧摩阻力乘以面积）的承载力相差较大，请问出现这种情况的原因？&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>