<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>lachin nuriyev's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/e85b8ba5_2d00_3f26_2d00_4385_2d00_82ec_2d00_cd9cc38ea0ae</link><description>Recent activity for people in lachin nuriyev's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Staad seismic</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/238573/staad-seismic</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:42:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8ef8d7c3-38e5-4590-abff-b4de6aeba716</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hi, I have to design a storage tank for seismic. In seismic, I added loads to the seismic load case in x y z directions to make seismic mass. In API650 there are load combs. In load comb f there are dead load(Selfweight Dl) and stored liquid load (Pl), I have added these two loads in the seismic load case to gain seismic mass. my question is should I add Dl and Pl loads in combination F or I should extract these loads from the combination, why do I say extract these loads I think in the seismic load case I already added these loads in x y z directions. Please help me&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; to make sure about this&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/1185.png" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/68153.png" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/asa.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Staad seismic</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/i/ram-concept/staad-seismic</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:35:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:047a93fa-2965-4edc-9a61-66627d140121</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I have to design a storage tank for seismic. In seismic, I added loads to the seismic load case in x y z directions to make seismic mass. In API650 there are load combs. In load comb f there are dead load(Selfweight Dl) and stored liquid load (Pl), I have added these two loads in the seismic load case to gain seismic mass. my question is should I add Dl and Pl loads in combination F or I should extract these loads from the combination, why do I say extract these loads I think in the seismic load case I already added these loads in x y z directions. Please help to make sure about this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/1.png" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/12.png" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/telligent-ideas/fc54a522-9edc-451d-a8f5-76cbbbd001be/asa.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Staad.Pro I section+plate</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/238165/staad-pro-i-section-plate</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 05:50:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1c8173fe-9faa-41fc-830d-485805a32ca4</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. I need your help to clarify my decision. In our design, we have an I (W) section and an above plate, I want to add plate thickness and some length to the I section up flange. When I analyze the model, I section has a UC ratio of 1.5 but when I add plate thickness to up flange, the ratio goes down to 0.1. Is that the right approach to add plate thickness to the I-beam up flange?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Screenshot-2022_2D00_11_2D00_10-095025.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Staad seismic</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/233444/staad-seismic</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:29:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:93559f01-7c34-4de3-bdd5-c1e4eb99c55e</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. I use the response spectrum seismic method. I should apply permanent loads on 3 directions (x,y,z). I attached an image that indicates some loads in 3 directions. Is that correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/7776.Capture.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Staad.Pro - Seismic loads by response spectra</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/233053/staad-pro---seismic-loads-by-response-spectra</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 05:01:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:abb84063-7ad8-4e68-aa82-d18e0e72f938</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I need help defining seismic loads by using the response spectra line graph.&amp;nbsp; I add seismic periods and accelerations in the &amp;#39;Load Case Details&amp;#39; section (attached image). I did not use the &amp;#39;Definitions&amp;#39; section to consider seismic. My question is how to add loads to gather seismic loads&lt;img class="align-left" style="float:left;" alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/11352.Capture.JPG" /&gt; in load case 12. I have used repeat load. Is this approach correct?&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1658725253091v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Staad Foundation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/232134/staad-foundation</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 11:13:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ad5d82e5-9011-498a-ac8e-67db0ac5bcdb</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hi. I am having trouble with Staad Foundation.&amp;nbsp; I created a Tank foundation to analyze. The storage tank roof has a lot of elements such as the W section under the tank roof plate. In Staad foundation we can only consider roof plates, bottom plates, and tank average thickness. But doing that does not get me the actual weight of the storage tank. To consider actual weight I add some loads in Miscellaneous Dead Load (Misc) section (attached picture), but afterward, the results do not change. I have done it for different numbers of load values but it was meaningless, the result did not change. Is there any possible way to consider the weight difference in the Staad foundation to get the actual weight?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/staadfoundation.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Offset method</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/221277/offset-method</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:32:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:afae922c-f715-46b2-bfb3-dc56c2913831</guid><dc:creator>lachin nuriyev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hi, I want to find out is it appropirate to split Dia 820 beam to connect beam Dia 630&amp;nbsp; in points 1 and 2 or i must connect them in centerpoint then use offset command. Same for points 3 and 4, there is small gap between these points&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/3021.Capture.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:27:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0c20f5fa-5abf-458a-b5f0-7e5707fe2baf</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item></channel></rss>