<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>david terry's Communities Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/ede72578_2d00_1475_2d00_482a_2d00_9648_2d00_329ce28bb8ff</link><description>Recent activity for people in david terry's community</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Unable to see radial grid lines</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/123345/unable-to-see-radial-grid-lines</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:41:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7ade1a8a-99cb-4e56-b074-bdaf93b552f1</guid><dc:creator>david terry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Upon creating a radial grid and selecting it on my floor type nothing happened, very confused I tried an orthogonal grid and it shows up fine. The radial and the circular grids I tried creating simply don&amp;#39;t appear. My coworker replicated this in about 60 seconds starting a new model, generating a quick ortho and then generating a quick radial and he has the same problem, ortho appears, radial is no where in sight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone else experienced this problem or even found a solution?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EDIT: Answer found. Though, you only need 1 radial and 1 circular grid defined to make it appear. Also, I supplied a max distance when I defined the radial grid, that should be able to supersede the necessity of having a circular grid defined. A small workaround is if you make the circular grid distance 0 and name the grid &amp;quot; &amp;quot; [space], but unfortunately the bubble still shows up right in the very middle, but that&amp;#39;s a minor eyesore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Can &amp;quot;Design All&amp;quot; actually design &amp;quot;all&amp;quot;?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/109585/can-design-all-actually-design-all</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 01:31:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d7bc13cb-c97c-4741-aca8-a06123570bc6</guid><dc:creator>david terry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When clicking Design All (In the steel beam module) it clearly states &amp;quot;designing all unsized beams&amp;quot;. The problem with that is that I want it to design my &lt;em&gt;sized&lt;/em&gt; beams as well! I applied the actual member sizes that are currently shown (w12x19, w21x44, HSS....., etc.) to all of my members, but I need them design still; camber, studs, etc. Right now the design all gives me 191 errors and almost every single one is &amp;quot;not enough studs&amp;quot; because it did not design my composite beams that I gave a size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Applying a size is not designing a member, everything else still needs to be determined, the loads figure out and the cambers and studs assigned. I however, do not want to have to click every one of my members, scroll around the correct member size and then click analyze, update database for 100 members; shouldn&amp;#39;t that be the intent of the Design All button?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for any tips or tricks that help me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>