<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Joshua Close's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/f490cf94_2d00_0b58_2d00_40f2_2d00_9508_2d00_bb69f009de9c</link><description>Joshua Close's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Annotation Groups Dimensions for Cross Sections Views</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/212559/annotation-groups-dimensions-for-cross-sections-views</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:38:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3bb145e5-d094-4653-9508-e10914867d7b</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a couple of quick questions regarding cross section annotation groups and the use of dimensions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. As you can see the dimensions have open arrows. Is there any way to make these arrows closed? The element template references a dimensions style with closed arrows but this does not carry across into the markup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. On the left you can see 3 different annotation definitions for the three dimensions. I attempted to combine them into one, but when multiple segments were selected they all disappeared. Is this a common issue?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/4174.Annotation-Groups.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fill/Hatch cross section components queries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/236045/fill-hatch-cross-section-components-queries</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:18:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7357be5f-b9a4-4005-b960-e924953856e1</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to fill cross section components in ORD CONNECT 2021? I&amp;#39;ve followed this tutorial (&lt;a href="/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki/52655/video-hatching-components-in-cross-section"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki/52655/video-hatching-components-in-cross-section&lt;/a&gt;) and can get hatching to work through element templates, but the fill options do not appear to work in the same way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there another option?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, with the hatching workflow mentioned above, is it possible to hatch with a different colour to the outline?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Overlapping chainages in Profile Frame</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/229283/overlapping-chainages-in-profile-frame</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 15:10:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:70660523-57ee-4f6e-9488-23518bf77edd</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been putting together a profile frame that shows chainages and levels at regular intervals&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;at key stations like VPCs and VPTs. In some instances this leaves them overlapping as shown below. Is there any way to set them so that they do no overlap? I have tried using the collision menu but do not seem to be able to get this to work - it either moves all of the labels or none at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1651590592484v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Copying civil geometry with rules</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/221359/copying-civil-geometry-with-rules</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:26:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:95fc8fc2-4f0c-4114-a92f-81380d1a3a52</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to copy a number of items of ruled geometry all at once? I know that the copy geometry tool works on individual elements, but I need to create a large number of these indicative access&amp;#39; to run swept path analysis on them. Each one will be slightly different so I want to be able to adjust offsets and angles all at once. Is there a way to do this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1635333830792v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Drawing Files not staying in sheet view</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/219325/drawing-files-not-staying-in-sheet-view</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:15:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:19f12ea5-8e29-469f-bfe0-557bff2de58a</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using OpenRoads to generate plan/profile and cross section drawings within a Projectwise environment. The sheets are created within and OpenRoads 2D model seeds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To allow for Projectwise to generate pdf renditions, the file must be saved and closed in sheet view, but despite the fact that &amp;quot;auto save settings on exit&amp;quot; is turned on, the files always seem to default to model view. We have also tried with manually saving settings as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to force OpenRoads to default to the sheet view when opened?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 01:41:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:21249764-c42b-4599-b8eb-4262eb2c81e5</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item><item><title>Superelevation not showing on first profile sheet</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/217643/superelevation-not-showing-on-first-profile-sheet</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 10:23:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e399d0b5-1164-491b-8012-054d28c170d6</guid><dc:creator>Joshua Close</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While creating profile sheets I am finding that the superelevation section of the table displays correctly on all the sheets apart from the first one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the first sheet it looks like the left image, and on the rest it looks like the right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1628072481800v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you can see the superelevation is applied from the very start of the line (including the negative chainage), and the annotation group contains all the required fields.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1628072620852v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas what could be causing this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>