<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Pablo Marquez's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/f5afea1c_2d00_7899_2d00_47c3_2d00_a0e5_2d00_8e379d341d77</link><description>Pablo Marquez's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Time-Dependent Loss model used by Conspan</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/103694/time-dependent-loss-model-used-by-conspan</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:58:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:290af6e8-7b33-43a5-b791-52d989a7e237</guid><dc:creator>Pablo Marquez</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What Time-Dependent Loss model does Conspan use (CEB 90, ACI 209, LRFD 6th etc.)?&amp;nbsp; In the Design Parameters box in the Girder or Analysis tab there are options for Approximate Method, Refined Method, or Pre &amp;#39;2005 Interims&amp;#39; LRFD to compute losses.&amp;nbsp; This would lead me to believe that the losses are calculated based on the latest LRFD, but I have not seen the losses calculation methodology specified in any of the Conspan literature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>