<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Saurav Neupane's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/f71886e2_2d00_f23f_2d00_4817_2d00_82da_2d00_031c61d7d3ec</link><description>Saurav Neupane's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Calculating PNA of curved tub-girders for Eq. 6.10.7.3-1 in LEAP Bridge Steel version 22.00.02.19</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/237568/calculating-pna-of-curved-tub-girders-for-eq-6-10-7-3-1-in-leap-bridge-steel-version-22-00-02-19</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:37:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9aaf7347-90c9-4618-afe7-b4a8d4e29b56</guid><dc:creator>Aisulu Saliyeva</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the article below it mentions that the issue where &amp;quot;Distance&amp;nbsp;from top of concrete deck to the neutral axis of the composite section at the plastic moment was incorrectly calculated.&amp;quot; is fixed. However, I&amp;#39;m still running into this problem when designing &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;multi-span curved steel tub-girder unit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. Is this still an issue? Or maybe I&amp;#39;m missing something?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks like the program is not considering the section to be composite, although I have defined the members to be composite throughout the length under the Shear Connector Locations. AASHTO ductility check Equation 6.10.7.3-1 is failing no matter what section dimensions I define. I have calculated D&lt;span style="font-size:75%;"&gt;p&lt;/span&gt; by hand and confirmed it with another software (MDX) while LEAP is calculating much bigger values, as if ignoring the deck slab.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m using OBD version 10.11.00.40 with LEAP Bridge Steel version 22.00.02.19.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/products/bridge_design___engineering/w/bridge_design_and_engineering__wiki/62506/enhancements-and-corrections-in-leap-bridge-steel-version-22-00-02-19-part-of-open-bridge-designer-version-10-11-00-40-september-2022"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/w/bridge_design_and_engineering__wiki/62506/enhancements-and-corrections-in-leap-bridge-steel-version-22-00-02-19-part-of-open-bridge-designer-version-10-11-00-40-september-2022&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>