<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Jason Gingrich's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/f792ea6e_2d00_615d_2d00_4c58_2d00_ad93_2d00_3dcc2bd93250</link><description>Jason Gingrich's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Proposed Slope to Meet Subbase Daylight</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/109790/proposed-slope-to-meet-subbase-daylight</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:34:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9b862860-384c-4935-90de-2521268210f8</guid><dc:creator>CharlesCanon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my template I&amp;nbsp;am proposing a 1:4 slope on the outside. Sometimes the slope touches down before the subbase daylight, see image below. Is there a way that in this situation I can force my slope to extend to the subbase daylight point which the slope will vary from 1:4&amp;nbsp;and when the slope at 1:4 touches down beyond the subbase daylight it would place the 1:4 as my template dictates. I know I can use parametric constraints in this situation but it will not meet at exactly the daylight point which really doesn&amp;#39;t matter but I just want to know if there is a trick in the template that will do what I described.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/6505.Capture.PNG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/6505.Capture.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>TERRAIN MODEL EDITS NOT HELD</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/117536/terrain-model-edits-not-held</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:47:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:11b593dd-0620-4dc4-ae2f-b168ade92dda</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Kempe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a Terrain Model created from multiple Fieldbooks and appended using the &amp;quot;Create Complex&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve managed to delete all the pieces of DTM&amp;#39;s from each day, and have the one final DTM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have made several edits, like deleting triangles along the edge and adding some features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I played with the Contour interval to locate rod busts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certain editing commands, or maybe toggling on and off triangles have caused my edits to revert.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have no more Fieldbooks, they have been &amp;quot;STRIPED&amp;quot;, yet my edits are not always being held.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should I export to Land XML and re-import, then work on this surface?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have toggled the &amp;quot;de-activate rules&amp;quot; back and forth to see if this is the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are my edits becoming &amp;quot;rules&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t find any video or help on this problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SS3 - Draping raster to terrain model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/103164/ss3---draping-raster-to-terrain-model</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:07:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:88f25385-3ba9-4cf7-a1cf-83455cac7d2e</guid><dc:creator>hauglien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to drape an image to an SS3 terrain model. I am using the workshop files for &amp;quot;OpenRoads Quickstart - Roadway Modeling&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The raster is named MeadowPark.tif&lt;br /&gt;The CAD file I am using for testing is &amp;quot;North St.-Corridor-Metric.dgn&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;I have assigned dcdrape to the terrain triangles in our dgnlib. When I drape the raster to the referenced terrain model, the raster is scaled approx. 50% and repeated in X and Y directions. To achieve draping, the symbology for my terrain model is overridden to existing_triangles.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any ideas on how to solve this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/North-St._2D00_Corridor_2D00_Metric-_2D00_-Correct.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/600x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/7853.North-St._2D00_Corridor_2D00_Metric-_2D00_-Correct.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/North-St._2D00_Corridor_2D00_Metric-_2D00_-Draped.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/600x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/8547.North-St._2D00_Corridor_2D00_Metric-_2D00_-Draped.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>SS4 Corridor Clipping</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/115430/ss4-corridor-clipping</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:37:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:63efd2bf-e287-4eb5-9472-c52a010cdb16</guid><dc:creator>Wesley Nyberg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I keep getting the following error when I try to clip a corridor with another corridor:&amp;nbsp; An invalid clipping boundary was encountered and ignored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What could be causing this?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cross section  &amp;gt;  Place Cell/Block not working</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/123289/cross-section-place-cell-block-not-working</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:47:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9acdbfe2-a5fa-4208-9af8-363bf68ca763</guid><dc:creator>Naveen Verma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have created Cross section successfully using various styles . Now i have to place a Cell on alignment for annotation using PLACE CELL/BLOCK tool, but its not working.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have selected the Cross section set and filtered the horizontal alignment after this in Data section there is a object &amp;nbsp;Called cell / Block in this i have selected a cell and apply but it&amp;#39;s not showing in Cross section.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please suggest me any possible solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i&amp;#39;m using POWER RAIL TRACK V8i Version 08.11.07.428&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>InRoads Survey Field to Finish</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/123214/inroads-survey-field-to-finish</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:13:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5305bfff-5ce2-4a0a-b2bf-3a669a7988aa</guid><dc:creator>Devon Roe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am trying to setup a survey field to finish in Power InRoads. I have set many up in Civil 3D, but I am having trouble figuring out the web of files needed in order to get the correct symbols and line work in. I typically import just a text file/.csv. Point Northing Easting Elevation and Code with the basic commands of B=Begin, E=End, PC= Point of Curvature, PT= Point of Tangent, and CLS=Close figure. I have started altering the .xin file for the codes, but I am having trouble with getting symbols in and getting the linework on the correct level. I have found and altered the &amp;quot;LinkCodes&amp;quot;. Also, on import anything with a &amp;quot;B&amp;quot; at the end gets removed. Example &amp;quot;CB&amp;quot; turns to &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;. I assume it has to do with the Begin command. I have yet to find anything that explains the process and the files require to make this happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[OR] Why is the Style list in the component editor dialog box of the create template dialog box blank?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/123027/or-why-is-the-style-list-in-the-component-editor-dialog-box-of-the-create-template-dialog-box-blank</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 03:58:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:28615279-f904-419b-bb3e-b42f631bc9aa</guid><dc:creator>caddcop</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Where exactly should Open Roads be finding these styles? I have a linked XIN, exported component element templates. but the dialog drop-down is empty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are the kind of things that CADD Managers have to deal with and need better guidance on where, when and how are the best practices for OR as we migrate from InRoads?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Subsurface Utility Conflict Detection Bug</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/123060/subsurface-utility-conflict-detection-bug</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:29:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ab5b9ab1-649f-405c-8c91-cca6a4771fe9</guid><dc:creator>Robert Garrett</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When using the Subsurface Utility Conflict Detection tool, the elevations on the conflict nodes can get mangled in certain circumstances. &amp;nbsp;The sample feature definitions in the Bentley supplied libraries show the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feature Definition = New Conflict - this FD uses a single 3D cell for presentation of the found conflict&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feature Definition = Borepit Needed - this FD uses a top and bottom 3D cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem - when a feature definition comprised of a single 3D cell is used in combination with the selection of a surface in the Conflict Detection toolbox, the elevations assigned to the conflict node are incorrect and the node is drawn at the ground elevation instead of at the elevation of the found conflict.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The workaround - Always use a conflict node feature definition which has two cells assigned, such as the supplied Borepit Needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[Geopak] [OR] Showing ROW lines in dynamic cross sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/120695/geopak-or-showing-row-lines-in-dynamic-cross-sections</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:39:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:17c0bc0a-df8c-4c21-abbc-9a83c963d189</guid><dc:creator>Derek Schmidt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I represent ROW lines on cross sections using ancillary features, but this can be done only on permanent cross sections, and it has to be re-run every time I cut permanent cross sections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d not only like to see them in dynamic cross sections but also make it so it&amp;#39;s trivial to render them on permanent cross sections without ancillary features. (ROW lines are the only ones I use this tool for.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve looked at options in Element Templates, but I&amp;#39;m not seeing what to use. For some element templates, I see &amp;quot;Active Points&amp;quot; is filled with character &amp;#39;X&amp;#39;, and when I view this in cross section, it shows the X centered at the point. It looks like that setting is promising, as I can change the value to a cell, but that doesn&amp;#39;t work as I expect. When I change the line to use the template, I&amp;#39;m not seeing that cell displayed on the cross sections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since it&amp;#39;s not working as I expect, how should I expect that to work?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Plan &amp;amp; Profile Generator Using Wrong Sheet Scale IRV8i</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/41868/plan-profile-generator-using-wrong-sheet-scale-irv8i</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:15:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2370517b-ef42-49a3-a491-3d52ad9168b6</guid><dc:creator>caddcop</dc:creator><description>When I use the P&amp;amp;P, my reference file sheet is being scaled by the scale specified divided by the number of feet in a meter. Does anyone know what could cause this?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Problem Saving .GSF to ProjectWise</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/120634/problem-saving-gsf-to-projectwise</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:34:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5e98fca9-bb5b-4a35-adc0-9012ac70d72a</guid><dc:creator>Nathan Meade</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since recently upgrading to ProjectWise CONNECT I have now been unable to save my Site Modeler .gsf file back into Projectwise OR my local C: drive. &amp;nbsp;I am using the Inroads Site Modeler Add-in. &amp;nbsp;All other Inroads functionality seems to be there. I just can&amp;#39;t save any changes to my .gsf.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not using a Read-Only version or anything like that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only thing that works is to &amp;quot;Save-As&amp;quot; to my local. But, it still won&amp;#39;t take any updates to that file.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has anyone had these issues before and know a work around?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Feature definitions from .xin not carrying symbology through to dgn</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/120524/feature-definitions-from-xin-not-carrying-symbology-through-to-dgn</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:31:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:63e92546-7f3d-4fec-8812-a0d47b0f8336</guid><dc:creator>Matthew Murdoch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am working on PowerCivil SS4, with limited to fair previous SS2 InRoads experience. I am hitting a wall when it comes to symbologies and plan production. I have spent some time working through the various Wiki&amp;#39;s and videos available and have carried out the following workflow:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Created a library for local feature definitions, eg &amp;quot;Test.dgnlib&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Opened this dgnlib and linked an InRoads company .xin file by loading the .xin file in the Inroads window, going to Civil Standards &amp;gt; rt click Feature Definitions &amp;gt; Link Active Feature Styles.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Opened another PowerCivil dgn and configured the workspace to include the &amp;quot;Test.dgnlib&amp;quot; by going to Workspace &amp;gt; Configuration &amp;gt; CIVIL_CONTENTMANAGEMENTDGNLIBLIST &amp;gt; Edit &amp;gt; Append &amp;gt; added link to the test dgnlib in the workspace using a wildcard *.dgnlib&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results have been that I can now see the&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Test.dgnlib&amp;quot; from any PowerCivil dgn that I open and access the feature definitions, however, none of the symbology comes through, it only appears as a white line, unless I reload the original .xin file into the InRoads window of the .dgn that I am working in. I understand that linking to a .xin file from a normal dgn only creates the link so that you can see the features in the xin file, and doesn&amp;#39;t store the symbologies in the dgn. However, I thought that linking to a .xin file from your dgnlib was the answer to that &amp;quot;storage&amp;quot; problem, otherwise what is the point of creating a dgnlib?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I misunderstanding the concept of the dgnlib or is there something missing from my workflow?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Matthew&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>OpenRoads Cross Section Reference Border/Elevation Numbers Help</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/120176/openroads-cross-section-reference-border-elevation-numbers-help</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 21:09:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d0d0864f-e3d4-4e61-9f48-5dd0b14bc9af</guid><dc:creator>J. Baker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am using Microstation V8i v8.11.9.655 and I have a quick question about referencing a border into the generation of cross sections. I am able to get the border in there (including major and minor gridlines), I am just having trouble getting the elevation numbers to extend all the way to the top where they fit in the designated spot. The &amp;quot;Window Clearance&amp;quot; setting can be used, but it only properly affects the cross sections which go to a certain elevation (for example, if the window clearance is set to &amp;#39;30&amp;#39; to make the &amp;#39;Station 97&amp;#39; (max elevation of 670) elevation numbers to fit properly, but then with the same window clearance set to &amp;#39;30&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;Station 100&amp;#39; (max elevation of 675) elevation numbers go 5 units higher than they are supposed to go.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I understand that I am able to put the elevation numbers into the reference border, but if I did this, the cross section elevations would not correlate with the border elevations properly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank You.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>[InRoads SS4] Survey Points</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/119731/inroads-ss4-survey-points</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 14:02:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dbd594d7-2e45-4eec-b9b3-9d1aa613a36b</guid><dc:creator>Gerald Piotrowski</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, I have tried just about everything I know to change the size of the big magenta X&amp;#39;s in the picture below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the left side of the pic is the problem point and on the right side of the pic is a point that is displaying correctly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is what governs the size of&amp;nbsp;a survey&amp;nbsp;point? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/InRoadsPoint2.JPG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/InRoadsPoint2.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gerald Piotrowski&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Civil cell construction</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/119920/civil-cell-construction</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8bb70129-6716-42c8-9cef-356f50c0dbc9</guid><dc:creator>Derek Schmidt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So I am trying to do a civil cell that depends on two OpenRoads lines that intersect with arbitrary termini in a 4-leg fashion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the civil cell, I have lines that are constructed as offsets from the alignments. I&amp;#39;m constraining these offsets to begin at the intersection (using intersection snap) and run, say, 400 feet down each leg. Everything seems to behave quite well. I create the civil cell.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I go into another file, where there are real intersections. I place the civil cell. It looks like it&amp;#39;s working, but when I switch the direction of one alignment or another, especially multiple times for each alignment, the elements in the civil cell start breaking and it won&amp;#39;t work even if I change the direction on each alignment back to the original.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there something I should be looking for to solve this? Are there any key details I might have missed? Because I feel like I&amp;#39;m doing everything correctly, but the cell isn&amp;#39;t behaving.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>