<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>John Chen's Activities</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/members/fb0d4d1b_2d00_208c_2d00_403f_2d00_8d80_2d00_b16b999b0965</link><description>John Chen's recent activity</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Plaxis 3D plate output unit kN*m/m</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/199923/plaxis-3d-plate-output-unit-kn-m-m</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 01:07:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:42a915ef-dcc8-4ae3-b40f-f33d191b81b1</guid><dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;for the output of a plate element unit, I understand in Plaxis 2D, output unit is kN*m/m, that is in/out of plane issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In plaxis 3D, i have a piled protection slab for gas main, the output unit of plate element is still kN*m/m, how do I interpret the total moment, just ignore the /m ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;M11 and M22 is in 2 different directions of local axis, the plate is very long along the gas main and I don&amp;#39;t believe I need to times the length of plate to represent the total moment kN*m. So why the output is shown as kN*m/m&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>tied back wall - large prestress force cause the wall move back</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/205401/tied-back-wall---large-prestress-force-cause-the-wall-move-back</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 03:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dd8f0185-521e-4ee7-8f15-d75466ca334a</guid><dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a deep excavation shoring structure, I have modelled in Plaxis and compare with RS2 (received from client). It seems large prestress force (around 1500 kN) in Plaxis drag the wall backwards. Which I don&amp;#39;t believe this is right. While RS2 results shown expected movement pattern. Can someone explain why this happened ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have modelled the pile wall as plate using equivalent EA EI property. Free length anchor as node to node anchor. Bond length as embedded beam.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Plaxis-output.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/RS2-output.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/RS2-input.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Plaxis Pile behaviour significantly differs from Lpile and Wallap</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/205332/plaxis-pile-behaviour-significantly-differs-from-lpile-and-wallap</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 23:33:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a74bbbb7-bf83-4281-b432-1f53ed46df99</guid><dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have modelled Pile in Lpile, Wallap, and Plaxis 3D. Pile moment distribution in Lpile and wallap is similiar, however, Plaxis shows different behaviour.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ground condition. Very soft clay, over soft clay over dense to very dense then rock.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lpile and wallap moment gradually reduce to 0 as the depth increase.&amp;nbsp; While Plaxis 3D pile reverse side moment is evern greater than positive side. (clay modelled as undrained B).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any idea why this happens ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Lpile.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Wallap.PNG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/Plaxis.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>3D embedded beam layer dependent average lateral (Perpendicular) stress</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/201423/3d-embedded-beam-layer-dependent-average-lateral-perpendicular-stress</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:29:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:63ff1c84-083e-40ff-a537-36fee692b8ae</guid><dc:creator>John Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the lateral (perpendicular stress) acting on 3D embedded beam,&amp;nbsp; the formula in 3D-3-Material-Models, should it be 1/2(sigma xx + sigma yy) ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/343671/pastedimage1596698811420v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ask A Question I</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/achievements/460ac7df-7ccc-4c42-a204-9e05eef3be09</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 01:07:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c004da48-a086-414c-b278-3f432a6b61e2</guid><dc:creator /><description>Ask a question in a forum.</description></item></channel></rss>