half way (or less)

Hypermodeling infuses the project’s documentation into the 3D model, automatically.

After using BIM for 10 years myself I noticed it goes only half way (or less). To automate documents is one thing, but this does nothing at all, really, to improve the communicative effectiveness of documentation, the purpose of which is - to communicate effectively. 

It's about the medium of communication itself, which needs improvement. 

This is achieved (now) by infusing the project’s documentation into 3D, automatically. 

..which is not unlike infusing synchronized audio into moving picture, because doing so elevates the effectiveness of both audio (contextualized in picture) and picture (clarified by synchronized sound). 

Without Hypermodeling, you're just making silent film - speechless 3D that cannot be delivered because it carries nothing but ambiguity. Now the model is clarified by exactly what the team said it wanted to say about a project in its documentation..

 

Parents
  • The guy on the ladder is not well served if you communicate to him using morse code. Likewise he is poorly served when you communicate with him with naked 3D models. Likewise also, he is often poorly served by document drawings that because of the limitation of drawing itself can only communicate in isolated fragments of things without sufficient context. This commonly creates misunderstanding and incorrect action.

    When you infuse those documents into 3D, you make it easier, far easier in fact, to understand what they mean. You also make it far easier for the appropriate documents to be found. They are in the very location in the project where they exist.

    Now you can navigate all of the project's documentation naturally, in context and adjust your view angle as needed to understand.  

    There is nothing preventing the printing onto paper of any such view on demand, with the confidence that comes from the infusion of the project's documentation in-place.

    Construction teams will find that this medium of communication provides them easier access to the information they want while also making it easier to see and understand what it means, and how it relates to other things in context.

Comment
  • The guy on the ladder is not well served if you communicate to him using morse code. Likewise he is poorly served when you communicate with him with naked 3D models. Likewise also, he is often poorly served by document drawings that because of the limitation of drawing itself can only communicate in isolated fragments of things without sufficient context. This commonly creates misunderstanding and incorrect action.

    When you infuse those documents into 3D, you make it easier, far easier in fact, to understand what they mean. You also make it far easier for the appropriate documents to be found. They are in the very location in the project where they exist.

    Now you can navigate all of the project's documentation naturally, in context and adjust your view angle as needed to understand.  

    There is nothing preventing the printing onto paper of any such view on demand, with the confidence that comes from the infusion of the project's documentation in-place.

    Construction teams will find that this medium of communication provides them easier access to the information they want while also making it easier to see and understand what it means, and how it relates to other things in context.

Children
No Data