I. Settings
A. Positioning/georeferencing: - Positioning mode: Use photo positioning dataB. Main settings: - Key point density: Normal - Pair selection mode: Default - Component construction mode: OnePass - Photo downsampling: 50%C. Estimation policies: - Tie points: Compute - Position: Compute - Rotation: Compute - Photogroup estimation mode: OnePass - Focal length: Adjust - Fisheye focal: AdjustFisheyeFocalSymmetric - Principal point: Adjust - Radial distortion: Adjust - Tangential distortion: Keep - Fisheye distortion: AdjustFisheyeDistortion_01xx0
II. Results
A. Global:- Errors
NB: Horizontal and vertical errors are given according to the following spatial reference system: WGS84- Connections
B. Per photo:- Automatic tie points
- Connections
C. Per point:- Automatic tie points:
Hi Felix,
I think I've solved a problem but I found another.I managed to aerotriangular photos with the option "Vertical Automatic".Now the photos 125 and 143 appear to be in the correct position.
The model is not georeferenced.
In the next aerotriangulation I used the control points with the option:
(if I used the option "Use control points " then the aerotriangualcion failed.
In the last Aerotriangulation I used the option:
This is the aerotriangulaton report.
Apparently it's all right. (Attached to the report.)
But in reconstruction, some tiles fail. (Failed during photos pairwise matching)
In the tiles that fail, there are currently no control point.
How I can get the full model?
Thank you.
A. Positioning/georeferencing:- Positioning mode: Use control points for adjustmentB. Main settings:- Key point density: Normal- Pair selection mode: Default- Component construction mode: OnePassC. Estimation policies:- Tie points: Compute- Position: Adjust- Rotation: Adjust- Photogroup estimation mode: OnePass- Focal length: Adjust- Fisheye focal: AdjustFisheyeFocalSymmetric- Principal point: Adjust- Radial distortion: Adjust- Tangential distortion: Keep- Fisheye distortion: AdjustFisheyeDistortion_01xx0
Before aerotriangulation
After aerotriangulation
Type
Number of points
Median reprojection error [px]
RMS of reprojection errors [px]
RMS of distances to rays [m]
RMS of 3D errors [m]
RMS of horizontal errors [m]
RMS of vertical errors [m]
Control_points
5
2.08
2.37
0.031
0.035
0.016
0.04
0.07
0.001
0.000
Automatic_tie_points
68583
0.19
0.39
0.006
68513
0.22
0.40
Number of tested pairs
Median number of tested pairs per photo
Median number of connected photos per photo
1970
22
26
B. Per photo:- Control points
Photo
Photogroup
File name
Photogroup_1
DSC_0048.JPG
1
3.33
0.049
0.05
DSC_0049.JPG
0.030
0.02
DSC_0050.JPG
2.94
0.043
DSC_0051.JPG
2.41
DSC_0052.JPG
2.28
0.032
DSC_0053.JPG
2.38
0.033
DSC_0054.JPG
2.55
DSC_0078.JPG
2.23
0.01
DSC_0079.JPG
1.85
0.025
DSC_0080.JPG
2.02
0.027
DSC_0081.JPG
DSC_0082.JPG
2.29
DSC_0083.JPG
2.22
DSC_0084.JPG
2
1.82
0.026
0.03
DSC_0085.JPG
1.64
DSC_0086.JPG
1.58
0.023
DSC_0087.JPG
1.45
0.021
DSC_0088.JPG
DSC_0089.JPG
0.92
0.013
DSC_0094.JPG
2.85
0.09
DSC_0095.JPG
2.63
DSC_0096.JPG
0.08
DSC_0097.JPG
2.16
DSC_0098.JPG
2.03
DSC_0099.JPG
1.53
0.018
DSC_0100.JPG
1.98
DSC_0101.JPG
DSC_0102.JPG
1.62
DSC_0107.JPG
0.037
0.11
DSC_0108.JPG
3.15
0.039
0.12
DSC_0109.JPG
3.51
0.002
DSC_0110.JPG
3.26
0.040
DSC_0111.JPG
3.70
0.044
0.13
DSC_0114.JPG
1.70
0.022
DSC_0115.JPG
1.94
DSC_0116.JPG
2.17
0.029
DSC_0117.JPG
2.25
DSC_0118.JPG
DSC_0119.JPG
2.42
DSC_0120.JPG
1.61
0.024
DSC_0121.JPG
1.66
DSC_0122.JPG
1.41
DSC_0123.JPG
1.72
DSC_0124.JPG
DSC_0125.JPG
1.65
- Automatic tie points
Number of key points
DSC_0039.JPG
94717
684
0.004
DSC_0040.JPG
101638
764
DSC_0041.JPG
101407
776
0.41
DSC_0042.JPG
117972
474
0.38
0.003
472
DSC_0043.JPG
118662
285
0.43
283
DSC_0044.JPG
110571
104
0.30
0.31
DSC_0045.JPG
114780
91
0.25
82
0.24
DSC_0046.JPG
94308
338
0.14
329
DSC_0047.JPG
118519
1044
0.33
1039
0.34
112889
1577
0.005
1574
0.54
0.007
99521
2065
0.42
2062
0.62
0.009
101233
2209
2199
0.008
100453
2100
2090
103252
1975
1961
0.45
98543
1791
0.37
1779
100445
1761
1750
DSC_0055.JPG
99764
1766
1758
DSC_0056.JPG
97473
2052
2045
DSC_0057.JPG
99552
2450
0.44
2446
DSC_0058.JPG
95402
2677
0.46
2674
DSC_0059.JPG
91400
2918
2916
DSC_0060.JPG
94480
2718
2719
DSC_0061.JPG
88982
2547
2548
DSC_0062.JPG
70490
3938
3939
DSC_0063.JPG
63255
3827
3826
DSC_0064.JPG
63122
3924
3920
0.36
DSC_0065.JPG
61787
3835
3833
DSC_0066.JPG
67181
2630
2629
DSC_0067.JPG
65215
DSC_0068.JPG
65092
2440
DSC_0069.JPG
66035
3229
DSC_0070.JPG
67691
3594
DSC_0071.JPG
71949
3536
DSC_0072.JPG
71741
3710
3711
DSC_0073.JPG
72806
3680
DSC_0074.JPG
76466
2755
2754
DSC_0075.JPG
73696
2075
2074
DSC_0076.JPG
70467
1854
1852
DSC_0077.JPG
71003
1828
1826
67774
1966
65858
1929
1930
73640
1994
1997
78677
2068
2069
78316
2251
2249
92042
2648
2642
88887
2857
2849
0.35
101562
3302
3294
104932
3470
3466
114439
3445
3440
108233
3108
3103
119654
2821
2814
DSC_0090.JPG
112392
2521
2512
DSC_0091.JPG
106263
2314
2300
DSC_0092.JPG
95385
2153
2140
DSC_0093.JPG
82355
2171
2152
60033
2469
55886
2557
2543
51140
2655
2645
43146
2964
2959
46018
3832
3829
45730
3964
3957
46242
3776
3773
0.48
46411
2553
2545
36843
792
786
DSC_0103.JPG
45802
3383
3382
DSC_0104.JPG
49792
4393
4391
DSC_0105.JPG
52790
4497
4494
DSC_0106.JPG
51988
4759
4755
52567
4362
4359
54982
3633
3628
53865
2790
2783
50081
2416
2408
52302
2132
2123
DSC_0112.JPG
59463
1940
1937
DSC_0113.JPG
58194
1541
1540
72667
1280
77905
1458
1457
90572
1886
1884
92235
2407
2403
100715
2795
87428
3242
3238
77310
3425
3422
71398
3259
3257
65846
2866
2864
63459
2421
2417
63053
2131
2129
62493
1840
1838
DSC_0126.JPG
67738
1576
DSC_0127.JPG
76006
1497
DSC_0128.JPG
72485
1560
1559
DSC_0129.JPG
81271
1832
1831
DSC_0130.JPG
79962
2690
2688
DSC_0131.JPG
86494
2808
2806
DSC_0132.JPG
83946
2710
DSC_0133.JPG
81510
2738
2736
DSC_0134.JPG
84748
2304
2301
DSC_0135.JPG
100880
3407
DSC_0136.JPG
100209
3884
DSC_0137.JPG
97717
3792
3791
DSC_0138.JPG
98022
3744
DSC_0139.JPG
100178
3741
3742
DSC_0140.JPG
99318
2566
2567
DSC_0141.JPG
95497
1686
DSC_0142.JPG
99834
1412
1413
DSC_0143.JPG
89021
1452
1453
DSC_0144.JPG
86350
1552
1554
DSC_0145.JPG
85393
1722
1724
DSC_0146.JPG
82381
1657
1658
DSC_0147.JPG
77909
1660
DSC_0148.JPG
74620
1614
DSC_0149.JPG
76027
1670
DSC_0150.JPG
71548
DSC_0151.JPG
73799
1708
DSC_0152.JPG
63198
1648
DSC_0153.JPG
54360
1572
DSC_0154.JPG
51880
1595
0.51
DSC_0155.JPG
41828
1590
0.50
DSC_0156.JPG
38665
1564
0.53
1563
DSC_0157.JPG
36070
1395
1394
DSC_0158.JPG
36948
1052
DSC_0159.JPG
42906
723
DSC_0160.JPG
52871
528
0.29
527
DSC_0161.JPG
56595
459
DSC_0162.JPG
60609
610
DSC_0163.JPG
63503
715
DSC_0164.JPG
71510
914
DSC_0165.JPG
76691
2107
2106
DSC_0166.JPG
88076
2008
2007
DSC_0167.JPG
78236
2001
2000
Number of connected photos
128
13
15
8
16
19
23
21
24
28
25
27
37
39
20
35
34
36
30
38
40
48
47
50
49
54
55
53
33
31
29
17
18
42
52
46
44
43
32
11
10
9
7
C. Per point:- Control points:
Name
Category
Check point
Horizontal accuracy [m]
Vertical accuracy [m]
Number of photos
D1
Full
0.010
6
2.10
0.028
-0.009
-0.000
D2
3.32
0.041
0.042
0.017
D3
2.14
-0.020
D4
0.020
D5
1.89
NB: Horizontal and vertical errors are given according to each control point respective spatial reference system- Automatic tie points:
Median number of key points per photo
Median number of photos per point
Median number of points per photo
4
El 1 de agosto de 2016 a las 16:46 Felix James <bounce-6CB05797-2EE4-4758-901F-687CA096CD6F@communities.bentley.com> escribió: Message from Bentley CommunitiesFelix James Hi AisierYou say "When I have only photos without AT, and exported to KML, the photos are positioned correctly in Google Earth",However, they are not. See the screenshots below:2 photos (123 and 145) captured above the same area A view of their relative GPS position before AT in Google Earth: You can see here that these GPS tags are not correct.They acquisition pattern may at first look ok in Google Earth but the tags are not correctly linked to photos and we have no idea of how the are wrong (nor how they can be fixed. The problem does not come from ContextCapture but, more likely from the acquisition system.A workaround could consist of using a "fake" GCP derived from Google Earth (you would need to identify at least 3 GCP and their coordinates in Google earth before using them in ContextCapture for rigid geo-registration) however, this workflow is a bit inaccurate. View onlineIf you encounter issues clicking "View online", check here. You received this notification because you are subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here. To unsubscribe from a forum, please see this note.Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Hi Aisier
You say "When I have only photos without AT, and exported to KML, the photos are positioned correctly in Google Earth",
However, they are not. See the screenshots below:
2 photos (123 and 145) captured above the same area
A view of their relative GPS position before AT in Google Earth:
You can see here that these GPS tags are not correct.
They acquisition pattern may at first look ok in Google Earth but the tags are not correctly linked to photos and we have no idea of how the are wrong (nor how they can be fixed. The problem does not come from ContextCapture but, more likely from the acquisition system.
A workaround could consist of using a "fake" GCP derived from Google Earth (you would need to identify at least 3 GCP and their coordinates in Google earth before using them in ContextCapture for rigid geo-registration) however, this workflow is a bit inaccurate.
View online
If you encounter issues clicking "View online", check here.
You received this notification because you are subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here. To unsubscribe from a forum, please see this note.
Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Answer Verified By: Felix James
Thanks Felix.But I do not understand what is the problem and the solution.The problem is the data set?Or is the program that makes the AT wrong?
When I have only photos without AT, and exported to KML, the photos are positioned correctly in Google Earth. So where the error is in the GPS coordinates?
How I can change corrected GPS tags if they are not correct?Is there any way to make a correct AT without using the GPS position of the photos? Only control points?
Thank you very much.
El 21 de julio de 2016 a las 12:25 Felix James <bounce-6CB05797-2EE4-4758-901F-687CA096CD6F@communities.bentley.com> escribió: Message from Bentley CommunitiesFelix JamesHi Asier, Thanks for sharing the images. We managed to reproduce the same issue using your dataset. The pose of the cameras after AT is far away from their initial position. We believe the issue comes from the GPS tags of the images. They were, in some way, interchanged or maybe they are just wrong. Because of this the Block-AT is not “correctly” positioned after AT. The AT is computed independently and adjusted on wrong GPS tags, these GPS tags must be corrected before being used. View onlineIf you encounter issues clicking "View online", check here. You received this notification because you are subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here. To unsubscribe from a forum, please see this note.Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Hi Asier, Thanks for sharing the images. We managed to reproduce the same issue using your dataset. The pose of the cameras after AT is far away from their initial position. We believe the issue comes from the GPS tags of the images. They were, in some way, interchanged or maybe they are just wrong. Because of this the Block-AT is not “correctly” positioned after AT. The AT is computed independently and adjusted on wrong GPS tags, these GPS tags must be corrected before being used.