I am having problems laying out the project configuration file. When I use the same configuration file on two separate computers, I get different results. How do I make sure the configuration is pointing ONLY to the locations which I want it to for line styles, cells, and fonts?
Hi,
Unknown said:I am having problems
What kind of problem do you have. Can you provide more information and explanation why you treat the situation as the problem? As Tim wrote in his answer, the output from DEBUG would be valuable.
Unknown said:on two separate computers, I get different results
It's expected behaviour. The final setting of MicroStation workspace includes a processing of more configuration files and tens of configuration variables, where some of them are conditional. The question is how big the differencies are.
Unknown said:How do I make sure the configuration is pointing ONLY to the locations which I want it to for line styles, cells, and fonts?
What is your knowledge how workspace setting is created from the configuration files? If you will create msdebug file and will read it, you will see how particular variables are created and by different configuration files, so you will be able to decide what and how to set to reach you aim.
With regards,
Jan
Bentley Accredited Developer: iTwin Platform - AssociateLabyrinth Technology | dev.notes() | cad.point
My knowledge is VERY limited, but I am determined to understand how this works. Debug does not seem to work.
Attached is my debug file
Can you attach a debug from a machine that works, and one that it doesn't work for comparison?
Regards,
Tamicca SellarsMicroStation Product Manager
This is from another location
For viewing pleasure, attached is how my project config is currently set up.
a few notes:
To answer the notes above. Please bear with me, I am not computer savvy and have no idea what I am doing, but I am the best my company has to offer in this subject.
The reason one is done locally and one is done through the S: drive is because the over all goal is to get everyone in the company to use the same config file. The problem doesn't just lie between 2 computers, but with two "installations", I guess. Both of the debugs were ran off one computer because I get the same general responses pending the location of the config file. They are the same config file (or at least the ones I am attaching this morning are).
The cells, line styles, fonts, etc. will be project wide, since each project will require different settings.
Attached is the debug for the S: drive.
I think the discussion should be split into two topics: (A) Why your current configuration doesn't work as expected and (B) How your workspace should be implemented in a right way. I think (A) is not so important now, because your try has substantial weaknesses, so we should focus on (B).
A few notes:
You have defined that the basic features are:
What I think you can do (or at least try):(It's a simplified template you can try and to modified accordingly to your needs.)
As you can see, you don't have to do anything with pcf file. It's because the system how variables are evaluated is defined in a hierarchic way, so the only way you have to do is to start MicroStation with own definition where project files (pcf file + project folder) are placed.
If you add another project (pcf file + project folder with standardized subfolders) into this shared folder, it will be automatically available in MicroStation open file dialog immediately (after MicroStation restart).
One more note (there is always one more note ;-)
Another approach is to share the whole workspace folder (everything under Workspace) on a network, which can be done by changing _USTN_WORKSPACEROOT configuration variable. But in my opinion it's more complex because many more files are shared, so I think you should start with simplier "project only" sharing.
What is wrong with the definitions I currently have designating "MS_DRY=P:/...../12-01 AE-UPTOWN/" and "MS_COLD=S:/BENTLEY/V8/WORKSPACE/System/"
The intent is to keep all of the used cells, tables, fonts, etc. on the server and refer back to them as new projects come in (City, Client, TxDOT, etc). This description sounds like the intent is to copy all the cells, etc. to each project as it comes about, which would lead to the duplication of files.
Even with the Project configuration set to look for on location, why is it that when the configuration has different results when placed in one place versus another?