<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Time-Dependent Loss model used by Conspan</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/103694/time-dependent-loss-model-used-by-conspan</link><description>What Time-Dependent Loss model does Conspan use (CEB 90, ACI 209, LRFD 6th etc.)? In the Design Parameters box in the Girder or Analysis tab there are options for Approximate Method, Refined Method, or Pre &amp;#39;2005 Interims&amp;#39; LRFD to compute losses. This</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Time-Dependent Loss model used by Conspan</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/310324?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:50:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e2858f55-ebaa-4bf2-9afb-6f97166264f0</guid><dc:creator>Vinay mysore</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pablo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Time dependent losses are calculated based on the Latest LRFD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please click on the link below or copy and paste it to internet explorer to see what are the changes that&amp;#39;s been done to Leap Bridge Enterprise and in the same link you should be able to the changes and enhancements been done to Conspan. &lt;br /&gt;The same information can obtained by clicking on Updates Button in LBE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://communities.bentley.com/other/old_site_member_blogs/bentley_employees/b/shribhides_blog/archive/2014/10/29/what-39-s-new-and-changed-in-leap-bridge-enterprise-v8i-selectseries-7-v14-00-00-19&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LEAP CONSPAN v14.00.00.19&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Enhancements:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;1) 2013 Interim Revisions to the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications are now implemented. The&lt;br /&gt;primary change is phi factors based on strain limits rather than c/dt ratios and support for high&lt;br /&gt;strength steel.&lt;br /&gt;2) A new option has been added to neglect the haunch contribution to section properties&lt;br /&gt;computation is now available. Program will only consider the self‐weight only in this case.&lt;br /&gt;3) Connection to AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating (formerly Opis/Virtis) is now updated to&lt;br /&gt;support v6.5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fixes:&lt;br /&gt;1)Fixed program crash when working with layout of non‐voided rectangular slabs&lt;br /&gt;2)&amp;nbsp; For flared girder geometry cases, if beams were detected to be laid out non‐continuously,&lt;br /&gt;program prevented analysis from being run. Now only the warning is shown, but user can still&lt;br /&gt;run analysis.&lt;br /&gt;3)Some users reported program crashes when generating Enhanced Report for Positive Envelope&lt;br /&gt;Stresses. Fixed now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please let me know if you need any additional information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks ,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vinay&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>