<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>OBM variable thickness of deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/159085/obm-variable-thickness-of-deck</link><description>Hello, I have a trouble with a variable thickness of deck throughout the span of the bridge. I was using template for a deck slab w/ constraints and then I was trying to define the variable thickness by using variable constraints. At the preview it looks</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: OBM variable thickness of deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/474782?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 09:16:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:34b95cf4-bcc3-4f07-9e15-2e5757f7ae71</guid><dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I found a solution. It works for the numbers like at the photo. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But it works just for the skew angle of support lines 0 degrees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " height="265" src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/test3.JPG" width="410" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the skew angle of support line other then 0 it&amp;#39;s something like this. It&amp;#39;s not parallel to support lines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/test4.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: OBM variable thickness of deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/474728?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 07:00:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:875a7dca-1abb-41ad-adbb-1da0be8eff39</guid><dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I tested the numbers and still I don&amp;#39;t find a mistake. It works for the thickness -1 and -0.2 but I have no idea why it doesn&amp;#39;t work with a variable thickness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/test2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/test1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: OBM variable thickness of deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/474626?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 21:04:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:82a4dcc0-ede7-4791-8d23-e96778a81c86</guid><dc:creator>Sri</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you please try to verify if the values, -1.0 or -0.2 are valid based on how the parameters are defined. Use the Verify tool in the deck templates library to test the numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5930/constraints_5F00_check.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>