Similar issue was risen there years ago but haven’t information if the issue was solved.
(Question about Pierline stationing - https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/124548/obm---question-about-pierline-stationing/389770#389770)
I have developed for bridge modeling (road plan data + profile). The profile was created using Profile Creation -> Project Profile to element to get a copy of the main CL profile along side carriageway – the same elevations were assumed.
Then I put support CL’s according to the table that ca be seen on the screenshot. The same values are displayed as support property when support line is pointed. But the true position along the is different (here 110m difference). Values shown in magenta were applied. So finally, final model doesn’t fit to the parameters that were used as an input data. Where did I go wrong? How to fix It ?
By the way I have noticed the that for road alignment with starting station different from zero (e.g. due to adjusting to “real” road stationing, for piers data must be given assuming start station is still zero. Real stations are ignored.
And last not least. Is it possible to model double deck bridge one road alignment and offsets (e.eg ±10m to get “left and right” deck ? Does different stationing for left and right structures ca be applied ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Bogdan Majcherczyk
Please send me your files (attach all the referenced files if any) at vlad.grigoras@bentley.com and I will take a look!
For the second bridge, the user had the option "Use road alignment for stationing" checked, thus the stations were coming from there. After he recreated the bridge without that check, everything was ok.