OBM - Beam End vs Supportline; Bearing Seat vs Stepped

I'm trying to model/test a three span bridge, have a few questions:

1. once support lines are defined for two abutments and two piers, beam layout and beams are defined accordingly, I try to generate beam report and noticed this: if beam ends at support line at abutments (see attached), beam reports in spans 1 & 3 can be generated, however, if I want to have beam projection over the support lines (supposed to), no beam reports will be generated. However, there is no problem for span 2 where beam projection are defined at both piers.

2. Bearing seats at abutments - WP for both abutments are defined at front face of backwall, in order to place abutments properly, I define longitudinal offset of -1' and 1' for abut 1 and abut 2 respectively (as seen).  For left abutment, I assume bearings have beam seat, and bearing and seats are properly defined; for right abutment, I assume bearing seats are stepped, however, the stepped seat are outside of abutment.

Parents Reply
  • Hi,

    Please be aware of the following:

    - the pier centerline is aligned with the support line at placement time

    - the abutment centerline can be set in 3 positions in relation to the receiving support line, as shown in the image below.

    - the bearings are placed in relation to the support line and not in relation to the abutment centerline

    - the camber report will be generated only if you insert the required data (camber, self deflection, additional deflection) in the input dialog; also, you can import this information from LBC if you have designed the bridge there

    - the girders in OBM are always drawn straight i.e. no camber is modeled, so the report will be computed based on your input

Children