<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>FEM Analysis output for negative live load are significantly different than the values in the Line Girder analysis. CSibridge FEM model produces values closer to the liner girder analysis.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/bridge_design___engineering/f/bridgemaster-lars-leap-openbridge-rm-forum/233770/fem-analysis-output-for-negative-live-load-are-significantly-different-than-the-values-in-the-line-girder-analysis-csibridge-fem-model-produces-values-closer-to-the-liner-girder-analysis</link><description>Hello. 
 I am using LEAP bridge steel to compare results from a CSiBridge refined model. The model is a 2 span bridge with fixed supports at the ends to obtain the max negative live load at the abutments. 
 All the moments and shears have correlated pretty</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: FEM Analysis output for negative live load are significantly different than the values in the Line Girder analysis. CSibridge FEM model produces values closer to the liner girder analysis.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/725588?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 09:13:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:853fcada-fb29-4bf9-b2d6-319ad5e7b927</guid><dc:creator>Vinay mysore</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please double check if the LLDF are same for both FEM and LGA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please email me the concerned file so that i can test this issue on my machine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My email is &amp;quot;Vinay.Mysore@Bentley.com&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>