CONNECT Edition

Dear All,


Will the CONNECT Edition of AECOsim also has the same interface as MicroStation CONNECT? What will be the possible date of release of CONNECT Edition?

Please somebody answer this question properly as it is very important for our future plans.

Parents
  • Current plans are for an initial Early Access Program (i.e. beta) release later in the summer followed by a commercial release in Q1 2017. We do not have public dates for either of these yet, please watch the AECOsim | speedikon Announcements Forum where all relevant dates will be published.

    Marc

    Answer Verified By: Kaushal Aggarwal 

  • Hi Marc
    Thanks for the info. Well, if we can ask we would like to know what are all the enhacements this version will include.

    Regards
    Borja
  • Understood - it will just be a GRAND disappointment if, after all these years - we end up with a fancy Ribbon and still no finished door tool.

    Ustn since 1988
    SS4 - i7-3.45Ghz-16 Gb-250/1Tb/1Tb-Win8.1-64b

    Eric D. Milberger
    Architect + Master Planner + BIM

    Senior  Master Planner NASA - Marshall Space Flight Center

    The Milberger Architectural Group, llc

  • I have very low expectations on first Bentley Designer version on Connect regarding functions and tools for actual work. My guess is Bentley will have their hands full with just moving things to the new UI. Unfortunately, and more years lost for development of tools.

    Hopefully we will be able to use BD ss6 parallel to BD-Connect for a long time.

    And hopefully Position Mapping and custom icon bars are fully available in BD on Connect.

    Otherwise perhaps I'll stay in ss6.

    regards / Thomas Voghera

  • I actually liked Connect when I have a wide screen. The average screen can't hold what I call a PRODUCTION Ribbon. Just to small.
    And in that vein it is better than what we have now and easier to work in but not perfect. And I don't have hopes it will go beyond a final beta version. They problem I do have is I still want a better product in lieu of another menu. A new menu is the lowest on my production or profit list.

    Ustn since 1988
    SS4 - i7-3.45Ghz-16 Gb-250/1Tb/1Tb-Win8.1-64b

    Eric D. Milberger
    Architect + Master Planner + BIM

    Senior  Master Planner NASA - Marshall Space Flight Center

    The Milberger Architectural Group, llc

  • Hi
    I'm sorry I did not want to polemize. I just asked. If Bentley wants to change the UI is perfect. I assume they have their own political and technical reasons to do it.
    For me the main question here is to know if this new version solves the problems and the real lacks we are detecting in our daily work: a built-in network workspace installation system, compound floors, compound roofs, quatities in solids, smart dimensions, parametrics tools, new form tools, DV improvements, in my a opinion a v-ray plug-in for future rfa with v-ray materials attached, etc... If not, I'm sorry but I don't really understand the reason of a new version. Maybe I'm wrong but perhaps would be better, a classical and slow and boring 32bits SS7 with all the problems fixed and new tools added and then the new CONNECT version with all the advantages of 64bits.
    Regards
    Borja
  • Hi Borja,

    Obviously this is a... shall we say "loaded" topic.     ;-)      One of the primary reasons to port ABD to CONNECT is exactly because it will be 64bit and can take advantage of the additional memory available.   This is not a small thing to anyone who has run a complex process only to find that there isn't enough memory to complete that operation.    

    In regards to the tools themselves, as mentioned previously everything developed in 32bit has to be ported to 64bit.  The effort to port Ss6 as-is was a task in and of itself, and the more tools there are the longer it would take.  There are also underlying UI changes at a code level (vs. the ribbon presentation) that factor into things as well, and all of this had to be taken into account.  Remaining at 32bit only serves to delay the inevitable and makes it that much more difficult to port everything to 64bit code - we had to bite the bullet at some point, and CONNECT is that point. 

    The ribbon UI comes along for the ride since it's already part of MicroStation.   However, the Building development team has been able to shift things around a bit to make it more conducive to the needs of ABD.  So yes, it is the MicroStation CONNECT ribbon bar, but it's not necessarily an exact replica, if that makes sense.   The best bet (if feasible) is to take the EAP version for a spin when available. 



    Answer Verified By: Kaushal Aggarwal 

Reply
  • Hi Borja,

    Obviously this is a... shall we say "loaded" topic.     ;-)      One of the primary reasons to port ABD to CONNECT is exactly because it will be 64bit and can take advantage of the additional memory available.   This is not a small thing to anyone who has run a complex process only to find that there isn't enough memory to complete that operation.    

    In regards to the tools themselves, as mentioned previously everything developed in 32bit has to be ported to 64bit.  The effort to port Ss6 as-is was a task in and of itself, and the more tools there are the longer it would take.  There are also underlying UI changes at a code level (vs. the ribbon presentation) that factor into things as well, and all of this had to be taken into account.  Remaining at 32bit only serves to delay the inevitable and makes it that much more difficult to port everything to 64bit code - we had to bite the bullet at some point, and CONNECT is that point. 

    The ribbon UI comes along for the ride since it's already part of MicroStation.   However, the Building development team has been able to shift things around a bit to make it more conducive to the needs of ABD.  So yes, it is the MicroStation CONNECT ribbon bar, but it's not necessarily an exact replica, if that makes sense.   The best bet (if feasible) is to take the EAP version for a spin when available. 



    Answer Verified By: Kaushal Aggarwal 

Children