used OBD update5, We can see this promblem,But in another software(OPM),We see that ,About the projection lines below the railingsHow to remove or eliminate？This problem has seriously affected the drawing problem of our design.。
this is opening using OPM CE update4 his is opening using OBD CE update5
Attached is the picture I drew with OBD update5. You open it with OPM CE. Is it bottom cable? There are two problems caused by projection lines. One is that it is impossible to export drawings in other formats, Another problem is too laggy graphics, which causes OPM to run very difficult, and the software system crashes.
Can you help me?
Hi Ruan,
see my comment here:
https://communities.bentley.com/products/prostructures/f/subforum-prostructures/186894/about-hailing/548541#548541
This is the drawing of OBD CE U5, the figure that OBD CE U4 opens. Obviously, the guardrail designed by OBD CE U5 has some problems in some places, not between OBD CE and OPM CE.
Ruan Jian 阮健 said:This is the drawing of OBD CE U5, the figure that OBD CE U4 opens.
but in the original post you said:
Ruan Jian 阮健 said:this is opening using OPM CE update4 his is opening using OBD CE update5
Which is the software that causing issue? OBD U5? or OBD U4? or OPM U4?
In the past, only OPM CE U3 and ODB CE U5 were installed on my computer. So I opened it with OPM CE. Yesterday, I asked my colleagues to open using ADB CE U4 on their computer. This is also the problem. Does it show that there are defects in the ODB CE U5 after ADB CE U4 upgraded to ODB CE U5? Or there are some settings that I don't know, so I asked experts to help me?
Teacher, this problem only appears in OBD CE update 5, but it does not appear in other versions of ABD. Because OBD CE update 5 has many new functions, it is really very good, so I do not want to downgrade to below OBD CE update 5, so I am trying to solve this problem so that my design is more perfect. Thank you.
like I said. I don't think compound cells from OBD is compatible with OPM. I'm not sure where or who give you the idea that the cells would work seamlessly between the 2 software.
There's a work around, which requires you to create your own handrail compound cell.
Answer Verified By: Ruan Jian 阮健
I've thought about your point of view carefully, and I feel that what you said is reasonable. Whether it's OBD U5 or ABD U4 or OPM CE, they are all different software, so there may be a contradiction between software upgrade and version difference, and there is a problem of incompatibility. But the actual problem is that the versions used by our colleagues in the Department are different, and there will be problems in the general assembly process. How to solve this problem A question, do you have any good suggestions? Besides building compound cells?
FWIW, Compound Cells are unique to OpenBuildings/AECOsim Building Designer, in that they include 2D symbols and perforators. Only MicroStation's Parametric Cell functionality with Name Presentations and Perforators offers similar abilities but that is still in Technology Preview mode.
Your last question is not completely clear - "But the actual problem is that the versions used by our colleagues in the Department are different, and there will be problems in the general assembly process. How to solve this problem A question, do you have any good suggestions? Besides building compound cells?" Compound Cells have not changed between AECOsim Update 4 and OpenBuildings Update 5 so those should be interchangeable, but how does OPM factor in to their creation and/or use?