<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/building/building_analysis___design/f/aecosim-speedikon-forum/247587/structural-quantity-for-double-angle</link><description>In OBD U9 version 10.09.01.38 the structural quantities for a double angle member appear to be incorrect. Is there a way to fix this or has this been resolved in update 10?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/776748?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:04:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:11863fa9-d54f-4d04-b526-f03d15121119</guid><dc:creator>Sayan Acharyya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ruston,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure will let you about our findings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sayan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/776677?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 15:51:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7b0b0758-97e5-4ef7-9a7c-4e58d64d9ec0</guid><dc:creator>R RUSTON</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, keep me posted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/776559?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 06:51:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c4d73490-824f-4286-b890-79051b176c49</guid><dc:creator>Sayan Acharyya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ruston,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apologies for the delayed response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have raised a new case (&lt;strong&gt;CS0058955&lt;/strong&gt;) on your behalf and I&amp;#39;ll provide you further update from that case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sayan Acharyya&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/774949?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:36:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2f8fefe9-6621-4b2e-aabd-fffe74f0f65d</guid><dc:creator>R RUSTON</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#39;s the status of this issue?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773560?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 06:00:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0eff2052-09ff-4a4e-9fb6-1474252d583e</guid><dc:creator>Sayan Acharyya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ruston,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apologies for the delayed response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will have some discussion with our Dev team regarding this and will update you accordingly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sayan Acharyya&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773270?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:33:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5ad42777-76ff-4c5b-8d2c-ca3cf9b33207</guid><dc:creator>R RUSTON</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t see what size double angle you are using but the weight for a single angle L4x4x1/2 is 12.8 lbs/ft so a double angle 2L4x4x1/2 should be 25.6 lbs/ft.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773265?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:33:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:823d503a-3573-401c-b1fe-d7b0c21fed08</guid><dc:creator>Sayan Acharyya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ruston,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have tried to place a double angled member in OBD U10.1 (10.10.01.151) and here&amp;#39;s the result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5917/pastedimage1689183340613v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any specific weight&amp;nbsp;of this member? Please clarify a bit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sayan Acharyya&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773253?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 15:44:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7e91a5df-8264-49ff-b346-f1c049370000</guid><dc:creator>R RUSTON</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The weight of the member is incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Structural Quantity for Double Angle</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773248?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 15:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e5493dbb-7e9d-46a7-90f2-a8789200c15c</guid><dc:creator>Sayan Acharyya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ruston,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for letting us know about this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you please specify which structural quantities for the double angle member seems to be incorrect? It will be helpful for our better understanding and investigation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sayan Acharyya&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>