Cut patteren

I cant see the cut pattern in section of concrete , what is the possibilty?

Parents
  • Could be something as easy as scale.  When I make patterns I have a typical element that I work with a 1' cube that I see elevation, rendered iso and section.  This way I can check that it will work

    Ustn since 1988
    SS4 - i7-3.45Ghz-16 Gb-250/1Tb/1Tb-Win8.1-64b

    Eric D. Milberger
    Architect + Master Planner + BIM

    Senior  Master Planner NASA - Marshall Space Flight Center

    The Milberger Architectural Group, llc

  • Play with your pattern scale.  I think that may be it.

    Ustn since 1988
    SS4 - i7-3.45Ghz-16 Gb-250/1Tb/1Tb-Win8.1-64b

    Eric D. Milberger
    Architect + Master Planner + BIM

    Senior  Master Planner NASA - Marshall Space Flight Center

    The Milberger Architectural Group, llc

  • Tdanner001, in my file I actually created a new Form and assigned Part/Family to it.
    When I opened dweib's file I could not see the pattern for concrete either as dweib did not assigned the Part/Family properly, the pattern is not missing.

    I have attached a video how to assign Part/Family to the Linear Free Form.



  • Nasir,

    I see in your video that concrete part is not in your workspace.

    If assigned part is missing this would definitely keep pattern from showing.

    Using dweib's earlier dataset image, it indicated that part/family assigned to form does exist in his workspace.

    In Bentley's Delivered workspace for US and in my workspace the part;/family assigned in file also does exist.

    Have you modified workspace to remove wall component:concrete?

    Or maybe delivered regional dataset you are using doesn't contain this part.

    Nice video by the way. What are you using?

    Tom

  • And if the pattern was really missing it would now show in the Cut Pattern preview window, which in dweibs case does.

    Dweib you need to log a SR yourself or contact Support and ask for me.



  • Yes your correct pattern shouldn't have shown in preview window.

    That blows my theory.

    SR definitely seems like the place to go. I am curious what you find out.

    Tom

Reply Children