<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/building/building_analysis___design/f/aecosim-speedikon-forum/99090/clash-detection</link><description>I conncected two walls with L connection , anybody have idea why it detected as clash in clash detection 
 see attachment</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/294074?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:11:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:529f4123-a2c2-4d9e-a082-d4757f46ecbf</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cocchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct, Bisector refers specifically to a mitered connection while Parallel is a typical &amp;quot;L&amp;quot; connection. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though I&amp;#39;m still unsure why the original Bisector connection was not valid - it seems that was the cause of the clash, as though there was a true overlap and not purely coincident faces (which the suppression rules would cover). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/293636?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:04:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:db82b105-194f-4449-83e1-363c11e57abd</guid><dc:creator>Eric Milberger</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;because of the comment earlier I am wanting to make sure we are not having to replace the miter connection with the L connections as they do different things when rendered&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/293546?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:41:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3d42bba0-5f51-406a-aa92-94405f4f06bd</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cocchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t understand.... the two walls in the image already have a Bisector connection. &amp;nbsp;By using the Connect tool after the fact, you are just insuring that the connection is valid. &amp;nbsp; What I am not sure of though, is why the connection would not already been in this state. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/293247?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:01:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:239ae026-05e6-494a-84c1-e93b0255b08b</guid><dc:creator>Eric Milberger</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;But that is not a viable solution as a mitered cut is proper for unification and centerlines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/293191?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 04:49:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cffd8733-19cc-4464-9c13-491e2e8f872d</guid><dc:creator>dweib</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i used that one to solve the problem but it is not the default one , how I can make it default&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/293164?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:34:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f4b00e07-cb23-42b5-8ad1-2e18f559c9ab</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cocchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, they do appear to be identical. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would first suggest using the Connect Forms As L (Bisector) tool on those two walls, just to be sure that the joint does not contain any overlapping geometry. &amp;nbsp; Based on the image alone that&amp;#39;s the only thing I can think of. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/292846?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bc7175af-39a2-4e92-85a4-c1213c59b93f</guid><dc:creator>dweib</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5917/2014_2D00_07_2D00_21-08_5F00_19_5F00_09_2D00_HP-Support-Assistant.png"&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt=" " src="/resized-image.ashx/__size/690x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5917/2014_2D00_07_2D00_21-08_5F00_19_5F00_09_2D00_HP-Support-Assistant.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/292767?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:32:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5e28d9b2-789f-4104-a75f-0664b2fa3c58</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cocchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If there are any differences, can you attach a screen capture of the rules that are currently enabled? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/292475?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:16:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c7ee5897-34ed-4a7e-b7f4-ce2ab83d2e67</guid><dc:creator>dweib</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;yes it is similar , and still I got clash &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: clash detection</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/292384?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ea9d7246-90c1-4a2a-84fa-07a9c4fcf047</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cocchi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Assuming that&amp;#39;s a default mitered connection and not s true overlap, there shouldn&amp;#39;t be a clash. &amp;nbsp; Does your Rules tab have the default suppression rules checked similar to the attached image?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><enclosure url="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/00-5917-01-00-00-29-23-84/Suppression-Rules-Tab.png" length="11213" type="image/png" /></item></channel></rss>