<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Different results for two phase sequence approaches</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/202774/different-results-for-two-phase-sequence-approaches</link><description>Hi, 
 I&amp;#39;m trying to reproduce the results of a publication that deals with pile test loads. Here, a displacement load is applied to the pile. However, the simulations fail depending on the phase sequence. I have tried two different approaches. First,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Different results for two phase sequence approaches</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/608683?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:57:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c80aec8a-cba1-42fe-a237-7c9e4fd978a9</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Siegfried,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The activation of (self-)weight and loads in a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Plastic&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;phase,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Consolidation&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;phase and&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;Fully coupled flow-deformation&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;analysis is considered to be an out-of-balance force. In order to solve this out-of-balance, the calculation will use a linear relationship with the &amp;Sigma;M&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;stage&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;multiplier to activate these new loads. This is explained in more detail in the following article:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/45973/load-activation-in-time"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/45973/load-activation-in-time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That means that due to the different out-of-balance to be solved in each model the solution can be slightly different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The error you encountered, according to our reference manual, mentions that there are numerical problems detected. You need to inspect the input data and the calculation results in Output to evaluate why it fails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, in some cases, it helps to edit the numerical control parameters and edit the max load fraction per step to a lower value. You can check more details about these parameters and the impact on the analysis in our reference manual.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the above does not help identify the reason for this problem, please&amp;nbsp;submit a service request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, one of our support engineers can help you in detail:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href="https://apps.bentley.com/srmanager/ProductSupport"&gt;https://apps.bentley.com/srmanager/ProductSupport&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>