<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Extracting stresses from Python</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/209855/extracting-stresses-from-python</link><description>Hi, 
 I try to extract stress from the python. The extracted results are different from the plots. soilS1 = g_o.getresults(g_o.Phases[- 1 ], g_o.ResultTypes.Soil.SigmaTotal1, &amp;#39;node&amp;#39; ) . 
 or 
 
 sd1 = g_o.getsingleresult(g_o.Phases[-1], g_o.ResultTypes</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Extracting stresses from Python</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/638120?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:10:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0a1d9a68-9114-4872-890d-55b224fb1739</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Douglas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difference highly depends on the size of the generated elements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The smaller they are the more accurate the node results will be. I would recommend checking directly on stress points if you want high accuracy on results that are purely computed on integration points, e.g. stresses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Extracting stresses from Python</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/636638?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:02:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:982138b4-5d3c-4055-984b-90a24e378c77</guid><dc:creator>Douglas Tun</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stefanos,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your comments. I tried the stress point comment, but there is a minimal stress point compared to node points.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there a huge difference in results?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Doug&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Extracting stresses from Python</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/636051?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:23:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0c025dd0-f44e-4882-905a-6ba84ba85f5b</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Douglas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly,&amp;nbsp;one difference arises from the fact that you are checking results for stresses that are primarily computed on stresses but via nodes (extrapolated results).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can run the command:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;soilS1&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;g_o.getresults(g_o.Phases[-1],&amp;nbsp;g_o.ResultTypes.Soil.SigmaTotal1,&amp;nbsp;&amp;#39;stress point&amp;#39;)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The &lt;em&gt;getsingleresult&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;command works in a different way. You specify a position and the value will get extrapolated from the closest stress points available. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Therefore checking stress results on stress points is the most accurate, but when looking at nodes and on a random location requires an extrapolation process which depending on the mesh density may affect the results.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>