<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Different output results</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/215409/different-output-results</link><description>I have a problem with &amp;quot;Plaxis 3D output V20&amp;quot; Line Cross Section results 
 as you can see in the picture attached, the Maximum effective stress differs from either table or graph, and there is a huge gap between them. 
 I&amp;#39;m so confused right now and I</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Different output results</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/656191?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 18:34:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7488ff8f-d645-4fd0-9572-0feeefd2a4a4</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Sali,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This seems rather odd, indeed. Note that in general stress results in cross-section requires that results are extrapolated from stress points, which can affect the accuracy that depends on how dense the generate mesh is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to be able to assist you with your project and identifying the reason for the problem you experience, please submit a service request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, one of our support engineers can help you in detail: &lt;a href="https://apps.bentley.com/srmanager/ProductSupport"&gt;https://apps.bentley.com/srmanager/ProductSupport&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>