<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Plaxis: Site response facility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/219198/plaxis-site-response-facility</link><description>I have a query about Plaxis 2D (v.21 Ultimate) Site Response function that can be used for 1D Site Response Analysis (SRA). When we select “Site Response” from the “Modify soil layers” menu, Plaxis automatically converts the main geometry of the model</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Plaxis: Site response facility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/706633?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 07:56:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2602ac49-bc28-4ed5-b433-c02741b3c45f</guid><dc:creator>원호 정</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your valuable response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Plaxis: Site response facility</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/681450?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 23:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:82e5abbb-52f8-4e62-9a03-672b9896917f</guid><dc:creator>Sean Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Generally, whenever you generate a 1D column model using the SRA script the Lysmer criteria will be met unless you have materials that fit well outside the bounds of material stiffness. The reason being is that the Lysmer criteria is based on nodal spacing and the Finite Elements are already sub-divided among many nodes. Therefore, in nearly all practical applications you should be able to run the SRA without doing a element size calculation. However, I would still recommend doing it regardless as a habit of good engineering practice. (As a reminder:)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mesh elements should be small relative to wavelength (Kuhlemeyer and Lysmer, 1973) and the shear wavelength should be coupled with element size:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Element Size &amp;le; &amp;lambda; / 8 = v&lt;sub&gt;s, min&lt;/sub&gt; / (5 &amp;divide; 10) f&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&amp;lambda; = wavelength&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;v&lt;sub&gt;s, min &lt;/sub&gt;= minimum shear wave velocity&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;f&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; = maximum frequency component&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer to part 2 depends on if you are using a compliant base as your dynamic y(min) boundary. In that case, the input value is only the upward propagating motion (half the within motion). This is typically in a SRA because you are only trying to capture the upward propagation component of the motion (1/2 of total).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>