<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/232404/mobilized-passive-pressure</link><description>hy, 
 I need to determine the ratio between effective pressure (sigma_N to interface) and passive pressure (maximum resistence). For passive pressure i do not know how to calculate with plaxis (take sigma_v and calculate to hand maybe?) . Did someone</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/753896?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:58:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:aeee90a4-5e82-4889-b7a2-ddf99e3f1c20</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Waterman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Mohamad,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a cross section the stresses are determined by interpolation of the stresses in the soil elements where the cross section passes through. For the interfaces we actually directly calculate the stresses, hence interface stresses are more accurate than cross section stresses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis Waterman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/753895?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:55:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f421a26a-3d97-4a46-9ac8-ecb03e70b180</guid><dc:creator>Mohamad Raad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Dennis, a following question came up to my mind. What&amp;#39;s the difference between taking the normal stress from the Interface and taking it from a very close cross-section (cross-section total normal stress)? Do you recommend each method for a specific case or goal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/753879?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:08:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5496a89d-6999-4e0d-8fa3-22d7ae916791</guid><dc:creator>RAM&amp;#211;N CRONWELL SALAZAR MANRIQUE</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dennis and Pasquale&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a similar situation with a COMB-WALL (pile kings and sheet steel piles) for a quay wall, We need to calculate the SF of passive earth resistance.&amp;nbsp;Buy I have some issues for modeling the pile load test (PLT):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. I have the COMB-WALL modelling with Plain Strain. How should I model the pile load test? PS or Axisymmetric?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. I am thinking of modelling the PLT in the final condition of the COMB-WALL, it means after the dredging is done. Is that correct? What loads do I have to use to simulate the PLT?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Modelling pile as volume element with interface&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would really aprecciate some of your advices for these issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ram&amp;oacute;n Salazar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/721052?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:48:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dfdfa9b4-6cb3-465f-96fb-440be6d92137</guid><dc:creator>pasquale paldino</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks a lot Dennis for the answer. I appreciated it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/720995?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:43:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c49f849b-7a34-4f4a-bbe2-edc9e3e13f32</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Waterman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Pasquale,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The simplified theoretical maximum passive resistance&amp;nbsp;can be calculated as Kp*gamma*h where the coefficient Kp is can be calculated using for instance Rankine or Bell.&amp;nbsp;But that value doesn&amp;#39;t change per phase ... &lt;br /&gt;In reality, compated to theoretical solutions, the maximum passive resistance depends on a lot of factors like the cross section shape of the pile (circular, square) and whether the soil is cohesive or not. Taking all that into account is not possible in an anaylitical solution - then the only way is to just simulate a pile load test (in PLAXIS) to determine the maximum passive resistance and then per phase compare it with the actual effective stresses to get the ratio.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis Waterman&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/720977?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5a224699-5c0d-4a46-af5b-3129b9ce235d</guid><dc:creator>pasquale paldino</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Dennis for answer. I apologize for not give more information. I have a pile, for each phases in my model i have the normal stress of the interface, how do i determine the maximum passive resistence for each phases (does some correlation exist from tau_max?) ? For each phases i have to do the ratio between the effective pressure and the maximum passive resistence.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre class="tw-data-text tw-text-large tw-ta" id="tw-target-text" dir="ltr"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: mobilized passive pressure</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/720862?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:43:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d0f4fdf7-8d20-4db6-bde2-6d661addf37a</guid><dc:creator>Dennis Waterman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Pasquale,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately you didn&amp;#39;t give any information on the kind of situation you want to apply this. But generally both active and passive pressure is taken from the normal stress of the interface on active or passive side respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis Waterman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>