<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2D Groundwater flow - Global water level influence</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/232758/2d-groundwater-flow---global-water-level-influence</link><description>Hi 
 I am modelling a dewatering of an excavation, using 2D Plaxis V21 in the &amp;quot;steady state ground water flow&amp;quot; analysis. 
 For me it is not clear how I should set the global water level or what kind of influence this water level does have. 
 I made three</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: 2D Groundwater flow - Global water level influence</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/722068?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 07:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:16aba677-38a4-488a-9104-061fbc731d28</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Manuel,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Modelling water in a steady state groundwater flow means that PLAXIS will consider any external boundary conditions and the soil permeabilities for the calculation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would strongly advise you to follow the relevant webinar titled: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PLAXIS CONNECT Edition: Excavation Dewatering and Common Pitfalls&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://learn.bentley.com/app/VideoPlayer/LinkToIndividualCourse?LearningPathID=113626&amp;amp;CourseId=129954&amp;amp;MediaID=5019074"&gt;learn.bentley.com/.../LinkToIndividualCourse&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regardless, I can see that you are comparing three different cases and I can explain why the end result is as shown (assuming a couple of things without having the projects), however, the most important question is what do you want to simulate? What is your situation? And what do you want to achieve?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now going to the three cases:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case 1: the water level seems to either be short or going vertical up at the level of the wall. &lt;br /&gt;For a groundwater flow analysis, a water level drawn inside the soil will not be considered as only the external boundaries are prescribing a condition. Since your left-hand side is a closed boundary that means practically in the excavation there is no water. That is also confirmed by having dry clusters as water conditions.&lt;br /&gt;On the right-hand side I cannot see but I am assuming a high water level which is why you see it being fully saturated (I guess that is the first plot).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Having a high water level on the right-hand side means that water will try to go towards the excavation which is why you start seeing some water rising under the excavation bottom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case 2: the water level is above the excavation bottom but is overwritten by the dry water condition specified. Naturally, you cannot have a high water level in the excavation and have all the excavation dry at the same time. In this case, the Dry water condition wins over the global phreatic level.&lt;br /&gt;The horizontal water level is correct for the right-hand side and as described in Case 1, the result would be the same as on the excavation side practically there is no water condition defined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case 3: the water level inside the soil, also set to dry is ignored. However, this situation is different to Case 1 and Case 2 as you have set the clusters of the excavation bottom as dry meaning that no water can be present there.&lt;br /&gt;The rest is as described for the other cases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>