<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Safety analysis - Structural Actions</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/243262/safety-analysis---structural-actions</link><description>Hi, 
 In the safety analysis (Plaxis 2D) additional displacements that are generated are generally discounted/considered not to have a physical meaning. Is it therefore reasonable to assume that shear forces and bending moments calculated in these stages</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Safety analysis - Structural Actions</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/758873?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:40:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dad95898-ecac-4ae7-a8c4-eb07f2a00caa</guid><dc:creator>James Marshall</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the response Vasileios!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Safety analysis - Structural Actions</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/758776?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:35:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:693b0dd3-9d59-4e10-a412-23838222d3c8</guid><dc:creator>Vasileios Basas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi James,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;A safety analysis reduces the soil properties to a level where a proper failure surface is formed, and the model is no longer stable. The stresses and forces are redistributed during this process, leading to a rapid increase in structural forces. However, structural elements with elastic behaviour will not fail but will continue to be loaded, which is unrealistic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;Of course, you can mitigate this using structural elements with elastoplastic behaviour. In this case, you introduce a maximum axial force/bending moment, which will limit that structural element&amp;#39;s resistance. Based on the structure&amp;#39;s capacity, this may be the correct approach because it can improve the system&amp;#39;s response (soil - structure) to more realistic values.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;Another option is first to run a safety analysis to specify the Factor of Safety of your model. Once you have that value and the failure mechanism is known, you can then re-run the safety analysis with&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;a target &amp;Sigma;Msf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;slightly less than the value that has been calculated. During this analysis, the program performs a full safety analysis until failure. Then it recalculates the last step before the target value of &amp;Sigma;Msf to reach the target exactly. This will give you the deformations before failure and, therefore, more realistic structural forces.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span data-preserver-spaces="true"&gt;Nevertheless, interpreting results from a safety analysis certainly requires careful consideration and some engineering judgement.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>