<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Soil Nailing - Rock Bolt or Pile</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/f/forum/244589/soil-nailing---rock-bolt-or-pile</link><description>Good morning. I have seen some people model a soil nailing problem using embedded beam with pile behavior and others with rock bolt behavior. In which cases should a soil nailing problem be modeled considering a pile behavior for embedded beams?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Soil Nailing - Rock Bolt or Pile</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/763864?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 09:50:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:dcc1be04-3df2-4d15-910d-a1308870d7ac</guid><dc:creator>Stefanos Papavasileiou</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Edwar,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;Behaviour&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;property of the embedded beam&amp;nbsp;is there to make it easy for a user to pick their modelling type based on what they want.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Automatically PLAXIS has some predefined settings when you change from Pile to Rock bolt to Grout body. As described by Kousik, this has to do with the connection point.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the case of the pile, the connection is, by default, &lt;em&gt;Rigid&lt;/em&gt;, implying a rigid connection between the structural element and the surrounding soil. In the case of the grout body, this is set to &lt;em&gt;Free&lt;/em&gt;, meaning the structural element is only connected to a structure (typically the anchor rod) and not to the surrounding soil.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can read everything about this subject in our Reference manual (section 5.6.3.3, PLAXIS 2D 2023.1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, any fellow geotechnical engineer using this option can share their reasoning, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Soil Nailing - Rock Bolt or Pile</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/763798?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 07:04:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c54abd54-a8c7-4668-9f3d-5ad6b25e0782</guid><dc:creator>Kousik M P</dc:creator><description>&lt;p data-userway-s4-zoom-styled="true"&gt;Hi Edwar,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-userway-s4-zoom-styled="true"&gt;As far mentioned in PLAXIS tutorial manual, (Chapter: Dry Excavation with tie backs), PLAXIS has opted&amp;nbsp;anchor grout portions as &amp;quot;Embedded beam with Grout body&amp;quot;. And also, I&amp;#39;m practicing the same in my projects, since the connection between the node-to-node anchor and grout can be easily established automictically. In short,&amp;nbsp;using Pile behavior, may allow us to choose the fixity, rotations&amp;nbsp;of the connection. However, it is your wish to customize the connections. Please add your thoughts for healthy knowledge sharing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-userway-s4-zoom-styled="true"&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp; regards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-userway-s4-zoom-styled="true"&gt;KOUSIK M P&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>