dynamic analyses

RE: dynamic analyses

kubilay coşkun — Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:50:14 GMT

thanks.

RE: dynamic analyses

kubilay coşkun — Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:50:10 GMT

thanks.

RE: dynamic analyses

Dennis Waterman — Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:02:22 GMT

As mentioned before, just based on a graph we cannot judge whether this has a logical explanation or not.
Since this seems to be specific for a project you're running, I would suggest to create a support case so that one of our support engineers can have a look at it : https://bentleysystems.service-now.com/csp

With kind regards,

Dennis Waterman

RE: dynamic analyses

kubilay coşkun — Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:18:01 GMT

Although there is no increase in the acceleration-time graph, why instant increases are seen in the acceleration graph, this does not seem to be a normal behavior.

RE: dynamic analyses

Dennis Waterman — Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:19:26 GMT

Well, since you know that based on jus a single graph without context it can be judged why the acceleration is high I presume you also have the answer and there was no need to ask the question here.

With kind regards,

Dennis Waterman

RE: dynamic analyses

kubilay coşkun — Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:16:16 GMT

Of course it is, but there is no such behavior in the input earthquake acceleration-time graph.

RE: dynamic analyses

Dennis Waterman — Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:03:51 GMT

Dear Kubilay,

This is of course something that just based on a graph we can't judge.

With kind regards,

Dennis Waterman

RE: dynamic analyses

kubilay coşkun — Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:22:40 GMT