How to simulate different strain rates in undrained triaxial test with Plaxis3D

I would like to determine the effect of different strain rates in the undrained triaxial test with Plaxis3D. For example, how to input strain rate as 10e-5 per second with an undrained triaxial test in Plaxis3D, is it possible to do this case?

Parents
  • Dear Dennis,

    Thank you for your suggestions. I would like to investigate how excess pore pressure and deviatoric stress behave in saturated hard soil soft rock. In order to do so, I conducted CU testing at a strain rate of 10e-5 per second, applying confining pressures of 3.0MPa. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of strain rate on various aspects of the sample's response, including the stress-strain relationship, failure mode, peak strength, and peak strain. To facilitate this analysis, I created a cylindrical specimen with a diameter of 50mm and height of 100mm and created a 3D finite element model using the Hardening Soil model.

    (1) I have applied a cell pressure load of 3MPa and prescribed displacement in the z-direction at the top. Should I use 'free' at the displacements in the x and y directions?

    (2) Is it possible to calculate the time interval in staged construction as 0.01180 days based on strain rates of 10e-5 per second?

    (3) In the SurfaceGWFlowBC model explorer, could you please explain how to utilize SurfaceGWFlowBC as a saturated sample?

    Best regards,

    Intachai

     

  • Dear Kanthima,

    First of all, if you have the possibility to do it in 2D I would recommend that. It's far easier to use a 2D axisymmetric model for a triaxial test than using a 3D model.

    If you do have to use a 3D model, you would have to model it as a cylinder. Apply the cell pressure radial on the cylinder, and the prescribed displacement on the top. 

    1) I presume you're referring to the top surface where you apply the prescribed  displacement. Yes, there you should set the x and y directions as free.

    2) Yes, that's possible. Though you may want to do your calculation in seconds rather than in days.

    3) I wouldn't use a flow boundary at all, what would you need it for? Just prescribe a degree of saturation to the soil sample itself by setting it to "unsaturated".

    With kind regards,

    Dennis Waterman

Reply
  • Dear Kanthima,

    First of all, if you have the possibility to do it in 2D I would recommend that. It's far easier to use a 2D axisymmetric model for a triaxial test than using a 3D model.

    If you do have to use a 3D model, you would have to model it as a cylinder. Apply the cell pressure radial on the cylinder, and the prescribed displacement on the top. 

    1) I presume you're referring to the top surface where you apply the prescribed  displacement. Yes, there you should set the x and y directions as free.

    2) Yes, that's possible. Though you may want to do your calculation in seconds rather than in days.

    3) I wouldn't use a flow boundary at all, what would you need it for? Just prescribe a degree of saturation to the soil sample itself by setting it to "unsaturated".

    With kind regards,

    Dennis Waterman

Children
  • Dear Dennis,

    Thank you for your previous suggestions.

    Based on your guidance, I have encountered a challenge concerning the pore pressure outcomes, primarily due to the minimal value (nearly 0) of P water in this specific context.

    In my staged construction analysis, I have incorporated the following phases:

    1. Isotropic Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, time interval 330s
    2. Unloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -2500 kN/m2,  time interval 25s
    3. Reloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -850 kN/m2,  time interval 990s
    4. Shearing Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, with a prescribed displacement of (-0.01m),  time interval 990s

    All phases are configured with a "Phreatic" pore pressure calculation type, utilizing a consolidation approach. Furthermore, I have set the degree of saturation for the soil sample to "unsaturated."

    Given these conditions, I do not understand why the pore pressure fails to manifest in this scenario. Is it possible to determine the pore pressure response in this case?

    Best regards,

    Kanthima Intachai