How to simulate different strain rates in undrained triaxial test with Plaxis3D

I would like to determine the effect of different strain rates in the undrained triaxial test with Plaxis3D. For example, how to input strain rate as 10e-5 per second with an undrained triaxial test in Plaxis3D, is it possible to do this case?

Parents
  • Dear Dennis,

    Thank you for your suggestions. I would like to investigate how excess pore pressure and deviatoric stress behave in saturated hard soil soft rock. In order to do so, I conducted CU testing at a strain rate of 10e-5 per second, applying confining pressures of 3.0MPa. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of strain rate on various aspects of the sample's response, including the stress-strain relationship, failure mode, peak strength, and peak strain. To facilitate this analysis, I created a cylindrical specimen with a diameter of 50mm and height of 100mm and created a 3D finite element model using the Hardening Soil model.

    (1) I have applied a cell pressure load of 3MPa and prescribed displacement in the z-direction at the top. Should I use 'free' at the displacements in the x and y directions?

    (2) Is it possible to calculate the time interval in staged construction as 0.01180 days based on strain rates of 10e-5 per second?

    (3) In the SurfaceGWFlowBC model explorer, could you please explain how to utilize SurfaceGWFlowBC as a saturated sample?

    Best regards,

    Intachai

     

  • Dear Kanthima,

    First of all, if you have the possibility to do it in 2D I would recommend that. It's far easier to use a 2D axisymmetric model for a triaxial test than using a 3D model.

    If you do have to use a 3D model, you would have to model it as a cylinder. Apply the cell pressure radial on the cylinder, and the prescribed displacement on the top. 

    1) I presume you're referring to the top surface where you apply the prescribed  displacement. Yes, there you should set the x and y directions as free.

    2) Yes, that's possible. Though you may want to do your calculation in seconds rather than in days.

    3) I wouldn't use a flow boundary at all, what would you need it for? Just prescribe a degree of saturation to the soil sample itself by setting it to "unsaturated".

    With kind regards,

    Dennis Waterman

  • Dear Dennis,

    Thank you for your previous suggestions.

    Based on your guidance, I have encountered a challenge concerning the pore pressure outcomes, primarily due to the minimal value (nearly 0) of P water in this specific context.

    In my staged construction analysis, I have incorporated the following phases:

    1. Isotropic Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, time interval 330s
    2. Unloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -2500 kN/m2,  time interval 25s
    3. Reloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -850 kN/m2,  time interval 990s
    4. Shearing Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, with a prescribed displacement of (-0.01m),  time interval 990s

    All phases are configured with a "Phreatic" pore pressure calculation type, utilizing a consolidation approach. Furthermore, I have set the degree of saturation for the soil sample to "unsaturated."

    Given these conditions, I do not understand why the pore pressure fails to manifest in this scenario. Is it possible to determine the pore pressure response in this case?

    Best regards,

    Kanthima Intachai

Reply
  • Dear Dennis,

    Thank you for your previous suggestions.

    Based on your guidance, I have encountered a challenge concerning the pore pressure outcomes, primarily due to the minimal value (nearly 0) of P water in this specific context.

    In my staged construction analysis, I have incorporated the following phases:

    1. Isotropic Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, time interval 330s
    2. Unloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -2500 kN/m2,  time interval 25s
    3. Reloading Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -850 kN/m2,  time interval 990s
    4. Shearing Phase: Perpendicular surface load of -3000 kN/m2, with a prescribed displacement of (-0.01m),  time interval 990s

    All phases are configured with a "Phreatic" pore pressure calculation type, utilizing a consolidation approach. Furthermore, I have set the degree of saturation for the soil sample to "unsaturated."

    Given these conditions, I do not understand why the pore pressure fails to manifest in this scenario. Is it possible to determine the pore pressure response in this case?

    Best regards,

    Kanthima Intachai

Children
No Data