Unwanted water load appear in sectional face when the ground surface formed by importing

Hi, I am a newbie in Plaxis 3D. I am setting the model of deep excavation with lateral support.  

First, I creat the soil/existing ground by borehole only, and i set some volume to deactivate since the ground surface is not flat. And I creat all excavation volume by "structure: surface with extrude tool", it is not accurate due to the excavated surface with the different gradient in real case. The result generated is reasonably close.

Then, I found that the existing ground surface can be imported in borehole setting. I imported the surface in DXF format and it looks really great!! After that (re-calculation), it fails just in stage 1 (inserting sheet pile wall without any excavation). I dont know whats going on and i found that there are some external water load adding to the sectional face, which does not appear in my first method.

Please help.... Thank you.

Best Regards,

William

Parents
  • Dear William,

    Such results are common for the models, where one of the vertical boundaries is not «strongly» vertical (or horizontal, if we speak about zmin).

    It can be connected to imported geometry, because PLAXIS is very sensitive to all coordinates. In DXF you may not see it, but in the reality there are some point with coordinates, for example, 0.000001 m. In such cases we need to check all coordinates. In Output you can switch on Fixities (Ctrl + F) to see, is everything all right on all boundaries. In your case first of all we should inspect the xmin boundary.

    In some cases I create vertical dummy surface (bigger that vertical boundary) via extrude option and intersect it with volumes and other geometry:

    Then I delete all geometry out of model contour.

    Also it is interesting whether do you have an error (waterloads on the boundary) on Initial phase with Gravity loading calculation type and only soil geometry.

    I hope this information can direct you to the right solution.
    Good luck!

  • Dear Rushan,

    Thank you for your reply!

    After the review, here's the 2 result for checking the "Fixities", and they are different!

    but I don't know the actual meanings...

    Can you give me any advise? Thank you.

  • Dear William,

    As you can see, not whole boundary has fixities, only some parts:

    It means, that all geometry that have green arrows on this error boundary has the different x-coordinates in comparison to the x-coordinate of boundary. Please, check it. Also you can try the approach with dummy surface for intersecting and deleting extra geometry: create surface with x-coordinate equals x-coordinate of xmin boundary, intersect it with plates and delete extra geometry.

    I hope it will help.

Reply
  • Dear William,

    As you can see, not whole boundary has fixities, only some parts:

    It means, that all geometry that have green arrows on this error boundary has the different x-coordinates in comparison to the x-coordinate of boundary. Please, check it. Also you can try the approach with dummy surface for intersecting and deleting extra geometry: create surface with x-coordinate equals x-coordinate of xmin boundary, intersect it with plates and delete extra geometry.

    I hope it will help.

Children