Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Welcome
  • Products
  • Support
  • About
  • More
  • Cancel
PLAXIS | SOILVISION
  • Product Communities
  • More
PLAXIS | SOILVISION
PLAXIS | SOILVISION Wiki Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
    • Sign in
    • -PLAXIS Wiki
      • +Geotechnical SELECT Entitlements [GSE]
      • -PLAXIS
        • +Software and License - PLAXIS
        • +Documentation - PLAXIS
        • +API / Python scripting - PLAXIS
        • +Known issues - PLAXIS
        • +Models - PLAXIS
        • -Tips and Tricks
          • 3D Extrusion along a curved path
          • 3D Output: show results for shadings or contour lines
          • 64 bit User Defined Soil model
          • After a consolidation analysis I have excess pore pressures in "drained" material sets. Why?
          • Application of commands: echo
          • Application of commands: Groupfiltered and Apply
          • Application of commands: Referring to objects through their index
          • Calculation Kernel Convergence log
          • Can I import a geometry in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Can I reuse existing PLAXIS 3D geometrical objects in a new project?
          • Change temporary folder for intermediate calculation data files
          • Closing PLAXIS after your calculation is finished
          • CodeMeter network error during calculation (IPv4/v6 conflict)
          • Codemeter Network Installation
          • Codemeter USB Stick behaviour
          • Command line reference
          • Compliant base and free field boundaries: check on input signal
          • Composite liner approach in PLAXIS 2D
          • Connect a node-to-node anchor with an embedded beam row halfway
          • Considerations for modelling a thick slab as a plate
          • Consolidation: Minimum Pore Pressures and Degree of Consolidation analysis may give spurious displacements of boundary nodes
          • Conversion from 2D Version 8/9
          • Conversion of PLAXIS 2D files
          • Copy/Array command in Plaxis 2D
          • Create centerline for Structural Forces in Volumes
          • Create rock bolts accurately in PLAXIS 3D
          • Creating axial force curve for Fixed End anchors
          • Deactivated loads are still visible in PLAXIS Output
          • Definition of a bending moment as load
          • Definition of Hoek-Brown model parameters in Plaxis
          • Drained Settlement Vs. Consolidation: Differences at Failure in Output
          • Drift correction for dynamic input signal from file
          • During a calculation some plastic points disappear. How is that possible?
          • Dynamic Load with Perpendicular Distribution
          • Encrypted scripting server vulnerable to replay attacks
          • End bearing of plates
          • Energy saving while running multiple calculations
          • Error when generating 3D mesh
          • Export and format plots from PLAXIS Output
          • Export or reuse geometry for New Analysis
          • Extended command syntax for mesh generation
          • Fixed and Compliant base: what input motion is required?
          • Fixities and deformation boundary conditions
          • Force envelope results explained
          • Fundamentals of pseudo-static analysis in PLAXIS
          • General modeling guidelines - recommendations
          • Graphics card issues
          • How do I import a geometry in PLAXIS 3D?
          • How does Plaxis deal with water pressures during dynamic calculations?
          • How does Reset displacements to zero work?
          • How does the option volumetric strain work?
          • How to activate a dynamic load
          • How to change the PLAXIS model width
          • How to check undrained shear strength using Undrained A?
          • How to convert PLAXIS V21 material database to the V22 format
          • How to define and edit a material via the command line
          • How to get a load - displacement curve using SumMstage
          • How to prescribe a dynamic displacement
          • How to run a Limit Equilibrium Method analysis from PLAXIS 2D
          • How to select more than 10 nodes to be used for a curve
          • How to setup the number of steps stored in PLAXIS Input
          • How to setup tied degrees of freedom
          • How to use command log files
          • How to validate a material via the GUI and command line
          • I use PLAXIS and it says I do not have the proper entitlements
          • Improving speed of mesh generation in combination with stage generation
          • In Plaxis Curves it is possible to plot Force Fx, Fy and Fz. What are these parameters?
          • Initial degree of saturation for soil activated during staged construction
          • InputSettings object in Output
          • Inspect intermediate step results in PLAXIS Output
          • Install latest 2D version and 2D AE for converting older files
          • Is it possible to apply a distributed load on tunnel lining in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D 64-bit?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D enabled for multicore?
          • Iterative settings: desired minimum and maximum
          • Iterative settings: Influence of Arc length control
          • Iterative settings: Max unloading steps (arc length control)
          • Key not bound to machine
          • Language reset in PLAXIS 2D and 3D
          • Launch PLAXIS 2D calculations via DOS commands
          • Load activation in time
          • Local axis and its colour indication
          • Macros using the commands runner
          • Material datasets for plates: sheet pile wall in bending
          • Materials overview in the Model explorer
          • Memory usage in dynamic calculations
          • Mesh alignment in flow problems
          • Mesh generation might not work under Windows 7 due to security settings
          • Modelling a tapered pile
          • Modelling Rock mass using discrete discontinuities vs Jointed Rock
          • Modelling soil-structure interaction: interfaces
          • Modelling technique: Vacuum consolidation
          • Modifying boundary conditions
          • Multicore CPU and 32/64-bit
          • Node-to-Node anchors as an alternative for Fixed-End anchors
          • Non-consecutive order of step numbers in Plaxis
          • Obtain Object names easily to use in commands
          • Obtaining tabulated data from PLAXIS Input
          • On different failure criteria for soils
          • On the initialisation of the temperatures of solid elements
          • On the use of dynamic boundary conditions
          • Opening old PLAXIS project gives a popup window. What should I do?
          • Output of flow results through interfaces
          • Output project compatibility
          • Permeability in interfaces
          • Permeability in interfaces: Practical situations
          • Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • PLAXIS 2D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS 3D 2013 and older PLAXIS files
          • PLAXIS 3D 2016: Fully parametric geometry
          • PLAXIS 3D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS Legacy version and supported CodeMeter drivers
          • PLAXIS Output Phase/Step object compatibility
          • PLAXIS Silent Installation
          • PLAXIS Soil model numbers in command line
          • Plaxis uses SMC files for earthquakes, but what kind of format is this?
          • Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • Problems related to non-associated plasticity
          • Program responds that drivers are out of date, but I have a newer version installed
          • Pseudo static acceleration
          • Re-use materials from other projects
          • Reduction of stiffness does not lead to a change in displacements
          • Regenerate staged construction
          • Run multiple calculations easily
          • Safety analysis and displacements
          • Safety analysis and undrained behaviour
          • Safety analysis and Updated Mesh
          • Safety calculation with a Target Value
          • Saving PLAXIS files for an older version
          • Select points for curves prior to calculation directly in Input
          • Selecting points for curves
          • Set multiple phases to be calculated
          • Showing a list of embedded beams by length
          • Smart selection of line elements in PLAXIS 2D Input
          • Stiffness units for structural elements in an axisymmetric model
          • Stress relaxation due to creep in concrete structures
          • Stresses in non-porous materials
          • Swept meshing in PLAXIS 3D
          • Tension cut-off in interfaces for User Defined Soil Models
          • Time step used in dynamic calculation
          • Trim and extend a line in PLAXIS 2D
          • Tunnels in PLAXIS 3D: Extrusions and cutting planes
          • Unable to select points for curves
          • Unable to select structures or nodes
          • Use of wells in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using an accelerogram for Dynamics
          • Using partial geometry for interesting result images in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using PLAXIS Remote scripting with the Python wrapper
          • Waterlevel inspection and editing in PLAXIS 2D
          • Westergaard's added mass for hydrodynamic pressures: a simple case
        • +Publications
        • +Videos - PLAXIS
      • +PLAXIS LE
      • +PLAXIS Monopile Designer
      • +SOILVISION
      • +Subscription Entitlement Service
    • +Working from home with PLAXIS
    • +Working from home with PLAXIS LE

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model

    Application PLAXIS 2D
    Version PLAXIS 2D
    Date created 01 October 2014
    Date modified 01 October 2014

    Introduction

    Piles are true 3D elements and as such, it is not possible to model piles highly accurate in a 2D model. Moreover, it should be realised that typical engineering aspects of pile behaviour (such as load-displacement behaviour, ultimate bearing capacity, ratio of load transfer to shaft and pile tip) should, in general, be explicitly checked by the user before running the main analysis. As such the pile behaviour should be considered a USER INPUT instead of a MODEL OUTPUT or RESULT. When the resistance of the pile is not directly required as input parameter (e.g., when using a plate element or solid elements), it is, in general, recommended to compare the mobilised resistance with that estimated from other methods (e.g. analytical methods to estimate ultimate load capacity).

    In this article, a number of reasons are indicated for the aforementioned behaviour.

    See the related article on pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model for an overview of the different pile modelling options and their possibilities and limitations.

    Installation effects

    Currently, it is not possible to accurately capture installation effects in a finite element analysis.

    A pile installation effect may, for example, be the lateral stress increase due to soil displacements during installation. The effects of installation may have a very significant influence on pile behaviour. However since at this moment we cannot model the actual installation process we have to choose to neglect these effects or to simulate them in a simplified way.

    A possible method here may be to use a volume expansion in the pile cluster to simulate the soil displacement and increase of lateral stresses. Note that additional numerical tools, which may help in simulating pile installation effects, are currently subject of scientific research.

    3D reality vs 2D model

    Using a 2D model while reality is 3D causes some unavoidable changes/simplifications in geometry, also see Figure 1. As a result, the cross-sectional area, skin and pile tip area will change, directly causing changes in pile behaviour.

    When modelling piles with volume or plate elements we will need to manually correct the stiffness properties of these elements and adjust the interface behaviour (i.e. Rinter) to find realistic load-displacement behaviour. Experience, however, shows that it will not be possible this way to accurately model all relevant pile engineering aspects. So you may, for example, have realistic axial load-displacement behaviour but not realistic lateral load-displacement behaviour.

    Note that with the embedded pile row element these drawbacks have been overcome to a large extent. The embedded pile row element automatically determines the required stiffness properties to account for the discontinuity along the out-of-plane direction.

    Figure 1. 3D Reality vs 2D model

    Soil-structure interaction

    When using volume elements or plate elements to simulate pile row behaviour an interface will be required to simulate soil-structure interaction. Realize however that the interface is also a continuous element in the out of plane direction (just like the volume elements and/or plate element), also see Figure 1.

    Now, in reality, there is soil-structure interaction at the pile location and a soil-soil interaction in between the piles but in the 2D model, there is only soil-structure interaction. As a result of the latter, an unrealistic shear plane may be introduced in the model at the interface location due to (un)loading of the soil when using an Rinter < 1. This behaviour may especially become relevant when there is a significant amount of lateral loading acting on the pile row. Also see the related article on soil-structure interaction for a more detailed description of the standard interfaces.

    Note that the mentioned behaviour is not relevant for the embedded pile row element. Due to the use of a special “out of plane” interface, this unrealistic shear plane cannot occur here.

    Recommended approach when modelling piles in 2D

    From the previous, it has become clear that modelling piles in a 2D model is not a straightforward process.

    It is recommended in all situations (also when working with the embedded pile row) to set up a simple test model prior to the actual (more complicated) model and to test the (relevant) behaviour of the modelled piles. Where necessary the model should be adjusted to obtain the desired engineering properties which are known from pile load testing, codes of practice, experience, engineering judgment, etc.

    See also

    Validation and Application of the Embedded Pile Row Feature in PLAXIS 2D

    [Publications]


    Modelling soil-structure interaction: interfaces

    [Tips and Tricks]


    Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model

    [Tips and Tricks]

    • installation
    • pile row
    • soldier pile
    • embedded pile row
    • micropile
    • PLAXIS
    • secant pile
    • piled raft
    • embedded pile
    • pile
    • screw pile
    • pile-raft
    • PLAXIS 2D
    • helical pile
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Micha van der Sloot Created by Bentley Colleague Micha van der Sloot
    • When: Mon, Dec 23 2019 7:10 AM
    • Micha van der Sloot Last revision by Bentley Colleague Micha van der Sloot
    • When: Tue, Dec 24 2019 6:15 AM
    • Revisions: 2
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2021 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies