Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Welcome
  • Products
  • Support
  • About
  • More
  • Cancel
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
  • Product Communities
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
GeoStudio | PLAXIS Wiki When is it appropriate to use dynamic programming?
    • Sign In
    • -Geotechnical Analysis Wiki
      • +GeoStudio
      • +PLAXIS
      • +PLAXIS Monopile Designer
      • +PLAXIS LE
      • -SOILVISION
        • Bentley's Acquisition of SoilVision Systems Ltd.
        • +Software and License - SOILVISION
        • +Documentation - SOILVISION
        • +Publications - SOILVISION
        • -Tips and Tricks - SOILVISION
          • How to import DXF contours as a surface into SVSLOPE
          • Is SoilVision Manager (formerly known as SVOFFICE) a separate program?
          • Eurocode 7 Design Standard with SVSlope
          • Pseudo-3D Consolidation Analysis
          • How can spatial variability help me? [SOILVISION]
          • When is it appropriate to use APEM - Alternate Point Estimation Method?
          • When is it appropriate to use dynamic programming?
          • Creating 3D dykes using extrusion
          • Material Volume Meshes
          • Multi-Plane Analysis (MPA ) in SVSLOPE
        • +Videos - SOILVISION
      • +Geotechnical SELECT Entitlements [GSE]
      • +Subscription Entitlement Service

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    When is it appropriate to use dynamic programming?

    Dynamic Programming Advantages:

    • Truly unrestrained non-circular slip surface
    • Can be used for weak layer detection in complex systems

    A conventional slope stability analysis involving limit equilibrium methods of slices consists of the calculation of the factor of safety for a specified slip surface of predetermined shape. The determination of the location of the critical slip surface with the lowest factor of safety is part of the analysis. To render the inherently indeterminate analysis determinate, conventional limit equilibrium methods generally make use of assumptions regarding the relationship between the interslice forces. These assumptions become disadvantages to limit equilibrium methods, since the actual stresses acting along the slip surface are quite approximate and the location of the critical slip surface depends on the shape assumed by the analyst.

    Limit Equilibrium methods (LEM) of slices have two major shortcomings:

    • There is uncertainty regarding the shape of the critical slip surface
    • There is a disregard for the actual total stresses within the soil mass
    • geotechnical
    • SVSLOPE
    • slope stability
    • LEM
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Mitchell Bauche Created by Mitchell Bauche
    • When: Thu, May 23 2019 12:50 PM
    • Faseel Khan Last revision by Bentley Colleague Faseel Khan
    • When: Mon, Jan 25 2021 2:13 PM
    • Revisions: 3
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies