Fixities and deformation boundary conditions


ApplicationPLAXIS 3D
VersionPLAXIS 3D 2011
Date created03 February 2012
Date modified03 February 2012

In PLAXIS 3D, default boundary conditions are automatically applied: see PLAXIS 3D Reference Manual in the section about Standard Boundary Conditions. For e.g. soil volumes this means:

It is also possible to define user defined fixities and/or prescribed displacements on points, lines and surfaces. A user defined fixity can be defined by introducing a prescribed displacement and then set the displacements in a certain direction to “Fixed” or set the value to zero.

When these default boundaries and the user defined boundaries conflict the user-defined prescribed displacements/fixities always 'win' from automatically defined fixities. This means that if a prescribed surface displacement is placed on the top surface and this surface displacement shares an edge with the side surface of the model (e.g. in the modelling of a symmetrical smooth footing), there will be no horizontal fixity on the shared edge. In this case, add a line prescribed displacement along this edge and assign the proper fixity conditions to it.

When there are multiple restrictions defined for a direction for a single location/node:

Combination of standard boundary conditions and prescribed displacements: Footing

In this example, we model a quarter of a geometry of a square footing: there is a symmetry axis in the x-axis, and also in the y-axis:

The footing will be modelled by a prescribed displacement, with uz = - 0.01 m for this case.

Case A: rigid

First we model the footing as a prescribed displacement rigidly connected to the soil, meaning all horizontal displacements directly beneath the footing are prevented (=fixed). At intersection of the boundary and the footing, the displacements are defined twice: e.g. at the x-axis / footing intersection, the default boundary conditions are:

However, the footing defines this at the x-axis:

According to the rules above this will be used for the calculation:
User defined boundary conditions overrule the default boundary conditions, so at the intersection of the x-axis and the footing:

This is exactly what was intended

Case B: smooth

Secondly we model the footing (=prescribed displacement) as being completely smooth, meaning all horizontal displacements directly beneath the footing are possible: ux and uy are free. At intersection of the boundary and the footing, the displacements are defined twice: e.g. at the x-axis / footing intersection, the default boundary conditions are:

However, the footing defines this at the x-axis:

According to the rules above this will be used for the calculation: User defined boundary conditions overrule the default boundary conditions, so at the intersection of the x-axis and the footing:

This is not what is intended for the calculation: in the axis of symmetry, it is not correct to have displacements perpendicular to the axis of symmetry.

In order to overcome this problem, some specific boundary conditions must be applied on the intersection of the footing and the model’s boundary. This can be done by adding a line with a prescribed displacement and setting the correct prescribed displacement conditions:

At the x-axis, a line was added that has the same conditions as the default boundary conditions at that side: uy is fixed, while ux and uz are free.
Now, at intersection of the x-axis and the footing, the displacements are defined three times. The default boundary conditions are:

The footing defines this at the x-axis:

And the line defines:

According to the rules above this will be used for the calculation:

See also