Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Welcome
  • Products
  • Support
  • About
  • More
  • Cancel
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
  • Product Communities
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
GeoStudio | PLAXIS Wiki Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
    • Sign In
    • -Geotechnical Analysis Wiki
      • +GeoStudio
      • -PLAXIS
        • +Software and License - PLAXIS
        • +Documentation - PLAXIS
        • +API / Python scripting - PLAXIS
        • +Known issues - PLAXIS
        • +Models - PLAXIS
        • -Tips and Tricks
          • 3D Extrusion along a curved path
          • 3D Output: show results for shadings or contour lines
          • 64 bit User Defined Soil model
          • After a consolidation analysis I have excess pore pressures in "drained" material sets. Why?
          • An error occurred in the application – What to do
          • Application of commands: echo
          • Application of commands: Groupfiltered and Apply
          • Application of commands: Referring to objects through their index
          • Calculation Kernel Convergence log
          • Can I import a geometry in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Can I reuse existing PLAXIS 3D geometrical objects in a new project?
          • Change temporary folder for intermediate calculation data files
          • Closing PLAXIS after your calculation is finished
          • CodeMeter network error during calculation (IPv4/v6 conflict)
          • Codemeter Network Installation
          • Codemeter USB Stick behaviour
          • Command line reference
          • Compliant base and free field boundaries: check on input signal
          • Composite liner approach in PLAXIS 2D
          • Connect a node-to-node anchor with an embedded beam row halfway
          • Considerations for modelling a thick slab as a plate
          • Consolidation: Minimum Pore Pressures and Degree of Consolidation analysis may give spurious displacements of boundary nodes
          • Conversion from 2D Version 8/9
          • Conversion of PLAXIS 2D files
          • Copy/Array command in Plaxis 2D
          • Create centerline for Structural Forces in Volumes
          • Create rock bolts accurately in PLAXIS 3D
          • Creating axial force curve for Fixed End anchors
          • Deactivated loads are still visible in PLAXIS Output
          • Definition of a bending moment as load
          • Definition of Hoek-Brown model parameters in Plaxis
          • Drained Settlement Vs. Consolidation: Differences at Failure in Output
          • Drift correction for dynamic input signal from file
          • During a calculation some plastic points disappear. How is that possible?
          • Dynamic Load with Perpendicular Distribution
          • Encrypted scripting server vulnerable to replay attacks
          • End bearing of plates
          • Energy saving while running multiple calculations
          • Error when generating 3D mesh
          • Export and format plots from PLAXIS Output
          • Export or reuse geometry for New Analysis
          • Extended command syntax for mesh generation
          • Fixed and Compliant base: what input motion is required?
          • Fixities and deformation boundary conditions
          • Force envelope results explained
          • Fundamentals of pseudo-static analysis in PLAXIS
          • General modeling guidelines - recommendations
          • Graphics card issues
          • Groundwater flow analysis in PLAXIS – Brief overview
          • How do I import a geometry in PLAXIS 3D?
          • How does Plaxis deal with water pressures during dynamic calculations?
          • How does Reset displacements to zero work?
          • How does the option volumetric strain work?
          • How to activate a dynamic load
          • How to change the PLAXIS model width
          • How to check undrained shear strength using Undrained A?
          • How to convert PLAXIS V21 material database to the V22 format
          • How to define and edit a material via the command line
          • How to get a load - displacement curve using SumMstage
          • How to prescribe a dynamic displacement
          • How to run a Limit Equilibrium Method analysis from PLAXIS 2D
          • How to select more than 10 nodes to be used for a curve
          • How to setup the number of steps stored in PLAXIS Input
          • How to setup tied degrees of freedom
          • How to use command log files
          • How to validate a material via the GUI and command line
          • Hydraulic conductivity input in PLAXIS using van Genuchten functional forms in a groundwater flow analysis
          • I use PLAXIS and it says I do not have the proper entitlements
          • Improving speed of mesh generation in combination with stage generation
          • In Plaxis Curves it is possible to plot Force Fx, Fy and Fz. What are these parameters?
          • Initial degree of saturation for soil activated during staged construction
          • InputSettings object in Output
          • Inspect intermediate step results in PLAXIS Output
          • Install latest 2D version and 2D AE for converting older files
          • Is it possible to apply a distributed load on tunnel lining in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D 64-bit?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D enabled for multicore?
          • Iterative settings: desired minimum and maximum
          • Iterative settings: Influence of Arc length control
          • Iterative settings: Max unloading steps (arc length control)
          • Key not bound to machine
          • Language reset in PLAXIS 2D and 3D
          • Launch PLAXIS 2D calculations via DOS commands
          • Load activation in time
          • Local axis and its colour indication
          • Macros using the commands runner
          • Material datasets for plates: sheet pile wall in bending
          • Materials overview in the Model explorer
          • Memory usage in dynamic calculations
          • Mesh alignment in flow problems
          • Mesh generation might not work under Windows 7 due to security settings
          • Modelling a tapered pile
          • Modelling Rock mass using discrete discontinuities vs Jointed Rock
          • Modelling soil-structure interaction: interfaces
          • Modelling technique: Vacuum consolidation
          • Modifying boundary conditions
          • Multicore CPU and 32/64-bit
          • NATM Tunneling - Beta Method: Incomplete Staged construction method vs. Deconfinement method
          • Node-to-Node anchors as an alternative for Fixed-End anchors
          • Non-consecutive order of step numbers in Plaxis
          • Obtain Object names easily to use in commands
          • Obtaining tabulated data for materials in PLAXIS Input
          • Obtaining tabulated data from PLAXIS Input
          • Obtaining time-dependent flow results at specific timestamps in a given time interval in Flow only calculations
          • On different failure criteria for soils
          • On the initialisation of the temperatures of solid elements
          • On the use of dynamic boundary conditions
          • Opening old PLAXIS project gives a popup window. What should I do?
          • Output of flow results through interfaces
          • Output project compatibility
          • Permeability in interfaces
          • Permeability in interfaces: Practical situations
          • Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • PLAXIS 2D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS 3D 2013 and older PLAXIS files
          • PLAXIS 3D 2016: Fully parametric geometry
          • PLAXIS 3D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS Legacy version and supported CodeMeter drivers
          • PLAXIS Output Phase/Step object compatibility
          • PLAXIS Silent Installation
          • PLAXIS Soil model numbers in command line
          • Plaxis uses SMC files for earthquakes, but what kind of format is this?
          • Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • Problems related to non-associated plasticity
          • Program responds that drivers are out of date, but I have a newer version installed
          • Pseudo static acceleration
          • Re-use materials from other projects
          • Reduction of stiffness does not lead to a change in displacements
          • Regenerate staged construction
          • Run multiple calculations easily
          • Safety analysis and displacements
          • Safety analysis and undrained behaviour
          • Safety analysis and Updated Mesh
          • Safety calculation with a Target Value
          • Saving PLAXIS files for an older version
          • Select points for curves prior to calculation directly in Input
          • Selecting points for curves
          • Set multiple phases to be calculated
          • Showing a list of embedded beams by length
          • Small overlaps curves message in SoilTest optimisation
          • Smart selection of line elements in PLAXIS 2D Input
          • Stiffness units for structural elements in an axisymmetric model
          • Stress relaxation due to creep in concrete structures
          • Stresses in non-porous materials
          • Structural results in tables and curve plots
          • Swept meshing in PLAXIS 3D
          • Tensile behaviour in the Hoek-Brown model
          • Tension cut-off in interfaces for User Defined Soil Models
          • Time step used in dynamic calculation
          • Trim and extend a line in PLAXIS 2D
          • Tunnels in PLAXIS 3D: Extrusions and cutting planes
          • Unable to select points for curves
          • Unable to select structures or nodes
          • Use of wells in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using an accelerogram for Dynamics
          • Using partial geometry for interesting result images in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using PLAXIS Remote scripting with the Python wrapper
          • Waterlevel inspection and editing in PLAXIS 2D
          • Westergaard's added mass for hydrodynamic pressures: a simple case
          • +Working from home with PLAXIS
        • +Publications
        • +Videos - PLAXIS
      • +PLAXIS Monopile Designer
      • +PLAXIS LE
      • +SOILVISION
      • +Geotechnical SELECT Entitlements [GSE]
      • +Subscription Entitlement Service

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model

    Application PLAXIS 2D
    Version PLAXIS 2D
    Date created 01 October 2014
    Date modified 01 October 2014

    Introduction

    In a lot of cases, there is a need to model piles in a 2D (plane strain) model. A typical situation may be the analysis of a superstructure that is (partly) founded on piles, such as a pile-raft foundation or a quay wall. In these cases, we want to approximate pile behaviour to be able to analyze deformations and forces of the superstructure and also obtain a first indication of axial and/or lateral loads on the piles.

    It should, however, be realized that piles are true 3D elements and as such, it is not possible to model all relevant aspects of pile behaviour in a 2D model. Moreover, it should be realized that typical engineering aspects of pile behaviour (such as load-displacement behaviour) should, in general, be explicitly checked by the user before running the main analysis. As such the pile behaviour should be considered a USER INPUT instead of a MODEL OUTPUT or RESULT. Also, see this related article for a more detailed discussion on the reasons for the aforementioned behaviour (Attention points related to pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model). Nevertheless, it is quite feasible to model pile behaviour in a 2D model.

    When modelling piles in a 2D model you can make use of the following modelling options (or combinations of options):

    1. Volume elements (+ interfaces)
    2. Plates (+ interfaces)
    3. Node to node anchors (+ plates)
    4. Embedded beam row

    Before considering which modelling option is most suited for your situation you should first consider the center to center distance of the piles in relation to the dimensions/diameter of the piles to determine if the overall behavior is more wall, pile row or single pile -like.

    Wall, pile row or single pile behaviour

    Depending on the center to center (c.t.c.) distance of the piles in our project the global behaviour may be like a wall, a pile row or a single pile:

    Let’s assume a pile with diameter D and a c.t.c. distance between the piles of L. Now if L/D = 1 the piles are directly next to each other and it is clear the behaviour will be like a wall. When moving the piles a bit apart (L/D is slightly larger than 1) probably the global behaviour will still be as a wall due to arching in the soil. However, when moving the piles further apart there is a point where global behaviour is no longer that of a wall but that of a pile row (i.e. the soil starts “flowing” in between the piles). Indications of the L/D ratios for which this happens can be found in geotechnical literature, but may typically be in the range of 1.5 to 5 (depending on soil type). When L/D becomes even larger than at a certain point we will have single pile behaviour (i.e. the piles no longer influence each other). We can visualize this also in the following figure:

    Figure 1. Dependency of behaviour on L/D ratio

    Possibilities and limitations of different pile modelling options

    In the table below the suitability of the different pile modelling options are indicated for modelling the recognized types of behaviour.

    Approach Wall behaviour Pile row behaviour Single pile behaviour
    Volume elements A C -
    Plate A C -
    Node to node anchor - C -
    Embedded beam row - B C

    Table 1. Suitability of different pile modelling options for the recognized types of behaviour

    A   good approximation
    B   reasonable approximation
    C   first order (crude) approximation
    -    not feasible/recommended

    Now with regard to using volume elements or plates for modelling pile row behaviour some specific drawbacks can be mentioned:

    • since we are basically modelling a wall the skin area may be different from the actual pile row. To obtain a correct transfer of forces to the skin you may need to adjust the Rinter, this, in turn, may influence the generation of an unrealistic shear plane (see Attention points related to pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model);
    • soil cannot flow in between the piles since we are basically modelling a wall, this may give unrealistic behaviour especially in lateral loading;
    • the bearing capacity of the shaft and tip cannot be directly controlled;
    • in general, it is difficult/impossible to obtain a realistic load-displacement behaviour both in axial and lateral direction so the user has to decide which one is most relevant. By trial and error fitting of the smeared (out of plane) structural stiffness properties and the interface strength/stiffness the model should be set up in such a way that best results are obtained. This procedure has to be repeated for each new model;
    • in general, a realistic distribution of forces between shaft and pile tip may be hard to obtain when the focus is on fitting the load-displacement behaviour.

    The mentioned drawbacks are overcome to a large extent by using the embedded beam row element for modelling pile row behaviour. This element allows for direct input of strength of the shaft friction and the tip resistance. Due to the special interface used the embedded beamrow also allows for a more realistic load-displacement behaviour in axial and lateral loading compared to the volume elements and plate elements. A default setting is used for the stiffness of this interface. This default setting is derived for a specific set of conditions, for other conditions, the so-called Interface Stiffness Factors (ISF) need to be manually determined. Also see this article for further information on the embedded beam row element (Case study: embedded pile row).

    Please also read this related article on some specific attention points and recommendations on pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model.

    See also

    Embedded pile row: A case study in PLAXIS 2D

    [Publications]


    Validation and Application of the Embedded Pile Row Feature in PLAXIS 2D

    [Publications]


    Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model

    [Tips and Tricks]

    • soil-structure interaction
    • soldier pile
    • embedded pile row
    • quay wall
    • micropile
    • PLAXIS
    • secant pile
    • piled raft
    • embedded pile
    • pile
    • screw pile
    • pile-raft
    • PLAXIS 2D
    • helical pile
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Micha van der Sloot Created by Bentley Colleague Micha van der Sloot
    • When: Mon, Dec 23 2019 7:11 AM
    • Stefanos Papavasileiou Last revision by Bentley Colleague Stefanos Papavasileiou
    • When: Tue, Jan 28 2020 7:02 AM
    • Revisions: 5
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies