Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Welcome
  • Products
  • Support
  • About
  • More
  • Cancel
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
  • Product Communities
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
GeoStudio | PLAXIS Wiki Composite liner approach in PLAXIS 2D
    • Sign In
    • -Geotechnical Analysis Wiki
      • +GeoStudio
      • -PLAXIS
        • +Software and License - PLAXIS
        • +Documentation - PLAXIS
        • +API / Python scripting - PLAXIS
        • +Known issues - PLAXIS
        • +Models - PLAXIS
        • -Tips and Tricks
          • 3D Extrusion along a curved path
          • 3D Output: show results for shadings or contour lines
          • 64 bit User Defined Soil model
          • After a consolidation analysis I have excess pore pressures in "drained" material sets. Why?
          • An error occurred in the application – What to do
          • Application of commands: echo
          • Application of commands: Groupfiltered and Apply
          • Application of commands: Referring to objects through their index
          • Calculation Kernel Convergence log
          • Can I import a geometry in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Can I reuse existing PLAXIS 3D geometrical objects in a new project?
          • Change temporary folder for intermediate calculation data files
          • Closing PLAXIS after your calculation is finished
          • CodeMeter network error during calculation (IPv4/v6 conflict)
          • Codemeter Network Installation
          • Codemeter USB Stick behaviour
          • Command line reference
          • Compliant base and free field boundaries: check on input signal
          • Composite liner approach in PLAXIS 2D
          • Connect a node-to-node anchor with an embedded beam row halfway
          • Considerations for modelling a thick slab as a plate
          • Consolidation: Minimum Pore Pressures and Degree of Consolidation analysis may give spurious displacements of boundary nodes
          • Conversion from 2D Version 8/9
          • Conversion of PLAXIS 2D files
          • Copy/Array command in Plaxis 2D
          • Create centerline for Structural Forces in Volumes
          • Create rock bolts accurately in PLAXIS 3D
          • Creating axial force curve for Fixed End anchors
          • Deactivated loads are still visible in PLAXIS Output
          • Definition of a bending moment as load
          • Definition of Hoek-Brown model parameters in Plaxis
          • Drained Settlement Vs. Consolidation: Differences at Failure in Output
          • Drift correction for dynamic input signal from file
          • During a calculation some plastic points disappear. How is that possible?
          • Dynamic Load with Perpendicular Distribution
          • Effect of suction on soil strength, compressibility and slope stability
          • Encrypted scripting server vulnerable to replay attacks
          • End bearing of plates
          • Energy saving while running multiple calculations
          • Error when generating 3D mesh
          • Export and format plots from PLAXIS Output
          • Export or reuse geometry for New Analysis
          • Extended command syntax for mesh generation
          • Fixed and Compliant base: what input motion is required?
          • Fixities and deformation boundary conditions
          • Force envelope results explained
          • Fundamentals of pseudo-static analysis in PLAXIS
          • General modeling guidelines - recommendations
          • Graphics card issues
          • Groundwater flow analysis in PLAXIS – Brief overview
          • How do I import a geometry in PLAXIS 3D?
          • How does Plaxis deal with water pressures during dynamic calculations?
          • How does Reset displacements to zero work?
          • How does the option volumetric strain work?
          • How to activate a dynamic load
          • How to change the PLAXIS model width
          • How to check undrained shear strength using Undrained A?
          • How to convert PLAXIS V21 material database to the V22 format
          • How to define and edit a material via the command line
          • How to get a load - displacement curve using SumMstage
          • How to prescribe a dynamic displacement
          • How to run a Limit Equilibrium Method analysis from PLAXIS 2D
          • How to select more than 10 nodes to be used for a curve
          • How to setup the number of steps stored in PLAXIS Input
          • How to setup tied degrees of freedom
          • How to use command log files
          • How to validate a material via the GUI and command line
          • Hydraulic conductivity input in PLAXIS using van Genuchten functional forms in a groundwater flow analysis
          • I use PLAXIS and it says I do not have the proper entitlements
          • Improving speed of mesh generation in combination with stage generation
          • In Plaxis Curves it is possible to plot Force Fx, Fy and Fz. What are these parameters?
          • Initial degree of saturation for soil activated during staged construction
          • InputSettings object in Output
          • Inspect intermediate step results in PLAXIS Output
          • Install latest 2D version and 2D AE for converting older files
          • Is it possible to apply a distributed load on tunnel lining in PLAXIS 2D?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D 64-bit?
          • Is PLAXIS 3D enabled for multicore?
          • Iterative settings: desired minimum and maximum
          • Iterative settings: Influence of Arc length control
          • Iterative settings: Max unloading steps (arc length control)
          • Key not bound to machine
          • Language reset in PLAXIS 2D and 3D
          • Launch PLAXIS 2D calculations via DOS commands
          • Load activation in time
          • Local axis and its colour indication
          • Macros using the commands runner
          • Material datasets for plates: sheet pile wall in bending
          • Materials overview in the Model explorer
          • Memory usage in dynamic calculations
          • Mesh alignment in flow problems
          • Mesh generation might not work under Windows 7 due to security settings
          • Modelling a tapered pile
          • Modelling Rock mass using discrete discontinuities vs Jointed Rock
          • Modelling soil-structure interaction: interfaces
          • Modelling technique: Vacuum consolidation
          • Modifying boundary conditions
          • Multicore CPU and 32/64-bit
          • NATM Tunneling - Beta Method: Incomplete Staged construction method vs. Deconfinement method
          • Node-to-Node anchors as an alternative for Fixed-End anchors
          • Non-consecutive order of step numbers in Plaxis
          • Obtain Object names easily to use in commands
          • Obtaining tabulated data for materials in PLAXIS Input
          • Obtaining tabulated data from PLAXIS Input
          • Obtaining time-dependent flow results at specific timestamps in a given time interval in Flow only calculations
          • On different failure criteria for soils
          • On the initialisation of the temperatures of solid elements
          • On the use of dynamic boundary conditions
          • Opening old PLAXIS project gives a popup window. What should I do?
          • Output of flow results through interfaces
          • Output project compatibility
          • Permeability in interfaces
          • Permeability in interfaces: Practical situations
          • Pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • PLAXIS 2D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS 3D 2013 and older PLAXIS files
          • PLAXIS 3D 2016: Fully parametric geometry
          • PLAXIS 3D Command compatibility notes
          • PLAXIS Legacy version and supported CodeMeter drivers
          • PLAXIS Output Phase/Step object compatibility
          • PLAXIS Silent Installation
          • PLAXIS Soil model numbers in command line
          • Plaxis uses SMC files for earthquakes, but what kind of format is this?
          • Points of interest for pile modelling in a 2D plane strain model
          • Problems related to non-associated plasticity
          • Program responds that drivers are out of date, but I have a newer version installed
          • Pseudo static acceleration
          • Re-use materials from other projects
          • Reduction of stiffness does not lead to a change in displacements
          • Regenerate staged construction
          • Run multiple calculations easily
          • Safety analysis and displacements
          • Safety analysis and undrained behaviour
          • Safety analysis and Updated Mesh
          • Safety calculation with a Target Value
          • Saving PLAXIS files for an older version
          • Select points for curves prior to calculation directly in Input
          • Selecting points for curves
          • Set multiple phases to be calculated
          • Showing a list of embedded beams by length
          • Small overlaps curves message in SoilTest optimisation
          • Smart selection of line elements in PLAXIS 2D Input
          • Stiffness units for structural elements in an axisymmetric model
          • Stress relaxation due to creep in concrete structures
          • Stresses in non-porous materials
          • Structural results in tables and curve plots
          • Swept meshing in PLAXIS 3D
          • Tensile behaviour in the Hoek-Brown model
          • Tension cut-off in interfaces for User Defined Soil Models
          • Time step used in dynamic calculation
          • Trim and extend a line in PLAXIS 2D
          • Tunnels in PLAXIS 3D: Extrusions and cutting planes
          • Unable to select points for curves
          • Unable to select structures or nodes
          • Use of wells in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using an accelerogram for Dynamics
          • Using partial geometry for interesting result images in PLAXIS 3D
          • Using PLAXIS Remote scripting with the Python wrapper
          • Waterlevel inspection and editing in PLAXIS 2D
          • Westergaard's added mass for hydrodynamic pressures: a simple case
          • +Working from home with PLAXIS
        • +Publications
        • +Videos - PLAXIS
      • +PLAXIS Monopile Designer
      • +PLAXIS LE
      • +SOILVISION
      • +Geotechnical SELECT Entitlements [GSE]
      • +Subscription Entitlement Service

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Composite liner approach in PLAXIS 2D

    Application PLAXIS 2D
    Version PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition 
    Date created 10 December 2020
    Date modified 10 December 2020

    General

    Double lining is a kind of tunnel structure composed of an outer primary lining (segmental or shotcrete) and an inner cast-in-place concrete secondary lining. As the double lining structure has many advantages, in recent years its application has become more frequent.

     Figure 1: Composite line sketch

    Figure 1: Composite line sketch

    In PLAXIS 2D it is possible to simulate a double lining in one of the following ways:

    1. Model the primary lining as a solid (soil) element and the secondary lining as a plate element
    2. Model the primary lining as a plate element and the secondary lining as a solid (soil) element
    3. Model both primary and secondary linings as solid (soil) elements. It is possible to do that by using the “thick lining” option inside the Tunnel Designer. Different materials, e.g. one representing concrete and one representing shotcrete, can be assigned to the linings.

    Note that it is not possible to model the two linings with overlapping plate elements. Plate elements are one-dimensional linear elements and therefore they cannot share more than one node. Consequently, modelling both primary and secondary lining with plate elements is not feasible.

    Table 1: Methods used for the modelling of a composite liner

    Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4

    Soil Element

    Plate Element

    Soil Element

    Plate Element

    Soil Element

    Plate Element

    Soil Element

    Plate Element
    Primary Lining ✓ ✓ ✓ ⨯
    Secondary Lining ✓ ✓ ✓ ⨯

    Depending on the thickness of each lining and their expected geometric effects, one of the above methods can be selected. In general, meshing of thin clusters might prove problematic, therefore it is advised to model thin tunnel linings as plate elements instead of soil elements.

    In most cases, an interface is also needed to simulate the interaction between the two linings and/or the cross permeability, if applicable. For instance, in some tunnels, a water-proofing membrane is installed between the primary and the secondary lining. This membrane acts as a slip joint and can be simulated as an interface between the two linings, with a user-defined interface and cross permeability. See also:

    (+) Permeability in interfaces - PLAXIS | SOILVISION Wiki - Bentley Communities

    Create thick lining

    To create a soil element representing one (or both) of the tunnel linings, the use of thick lining is necessary. This option, available in the Tunnel Designer, creates concentric circles, parallel lines, and parallel curves, by offsetting a geometric object at a specified distance. To define a thick tunnel lining:

    • Click the Generate thick lining button in the side toolbar in the Subsections tabsheet of the Tunnel Designer. The Generate thick lining window pops up.
    • Specify the thickness of the lining in the appearing window. The thickness is defined as offset to the outline of the tunnel geometry. A positive or negative value of thickness indicates whether the object is to be offset outside or inside of the original tunnel contour, respectively. Note that when the tunnel is included in the geometry model, a subcluster will be created for the thick lining. A proper material can be assigned to it, as it is done for the soil clusters.

    Figure 2: Generate thick lining

    Output

    PLAXIS 2D Output program provides a tool which can:

    • automatically and accurately detect the centerline of any (curved) solid shape following the arcs and radii of the shape and
    • compute the forces of on that shape.

    This functionality is called Structural forces in Volume Plates and it is available in the toolbar of the Output program next to the Curves Manager icon. For more information please refer to Chapter 9 (Results available in Output program) in the PLAXIS 2D – Reference Manual.

    When using this feature, it is possible to visualize structural forces (bending moments M, shear forces Q and axial forces N) in a regular structure (rectangular or tapered) that is composed of soil elements. Stresses are calculated at the stress points of the soil elements and the structural forces are then integrated from the stress points around the section cut of the centerline (see also below at section: “Cross-Section Results in Soil Elements”). Therefore, this process can be highly mesh-dependent and sufficient mesh discretization must be ensured to get accurate results.

    Figure 3: Structural forces in volume plates

    General considerations

    Difference in modelling methods

    The two different approaches (volume/volume and plate/volume methods) may yield slightly different results. This is because the plate is modelled at different locations in each case. Specifically, for the case of a plate/volume combination (Fig. 4a and 4b), the plate is modelled at the boundary (inner or outer side) of the adjacent lining and not at the centerline of the lining, which it represents.

    Consequently, each of the three composite liner cases (Fig. 4a, b and c) will have a different center of gravity and as a result also a different flexural rigidity, EI. Therefore, special attention is needed when calculating the equivalent Area moment of Inertia, I.

    Figure 4: Different modelling methods

    Given that a plate is a line element where its stiffness properties, EA and EI, are concentrated along that line, we could think of a plate/volume combination being similar to the concept of a composite T-beam (see Fig. 5).

    Figure 5: Equivalent representation of a plate / volume element approach

    Moreover, when modelling a tunnel lining with a plate element, its shear deformation should also be taken into consideration. As described in PLAXIS 2D – Material Manual (see “Structural Behaviour”), the material behaviour in plate elements is defined by the following relationship between structural forces and strains:

    The modified shear strain γ* takes into account the shear strain γ and some additional terms in order to give a more accurate approximation of the problem. Based on elementary transverse shear (Timoshenko Beam) theory and considering the assumption that the plate has a rectangular cross-section, the shear stiffness is determined using a shear correction factor equal to κ = 5/6 (0.833). In the case of modelling a solid wall, this will give the correct shear deformation. However, in the case of steel profile elements, the computed shear deformation may be too large.

    You can check this by judging the value of deq, which can be computed as √(12EI/EA). For steel profile elements, deq should be at least of the order of a factor 10 times smaller than the length of the plate to ensure negligible shear deformations.

    Cross-section results in soil elements

    By definition, a cross-section represents a distribution of a quantity along a line. However, the distribution of quantities in cross-sections is obtained from the interpolation of stress-point data and may be less accurate than data presented in the 2D model. This means that the results of a cross-section are highly affected by the mesh density and its distance from the adjacent stress points.

    The bigger the distance between the stress points and the cross-section line is, the bigger the interpolation and gradient error is.  When defining your cross-section line, you should make sure that the line "intersects" or is at least close to as many stress points as possible. You can turn on the visualization of these stress points by pressing Ctrl+I keyboard shortcut in Output.

    The “dummy plate” approach

    Although Structural forces in Volume Plates (see PLAXIS 2D - Reference Manual is an easy and fast way to extract the structural forces of a tunnel liner modelled as a soil cluster, as mentioned before, this method is dependent on the mesh density. An alternative approach for extracting the structural forces from a liner modelled as a solid (soil) element is that of the “dummy plate”. The strategy behind this approach involves the inclusion of a weightless plate element of low stiffness along the neutral axis of the tunnel lining to monitor the strain and curvatures changes in the considered composite section (see Fig. 6).

    Figure 6: "Dummy plate” approach

    While using the technique of the dummy plate, please make sure that you consider the following:

    • The dummy plate is located at the neutral axis of the solid element of the structure (usually the middle of the soil cluster);
    • The plate should not have any influence on the deformation of the lining. This means that the plate element should be weightless (the soil elements already contain the weight) and have a low stiffness (see below);
    • There should not be an interface between the plate elements and the solid (soil) cluster. This ensures that the nodes between the dummy plate and the surrounding lining are fully connected (tight bonding - no relative movement takes place).

    As mentioned above, the dummy plate has no influence on the deformation of the tunnel lining which encompasses the plate. This means that the strain, ε and curvature, κ of the dummy plate will be equal to that of the tunnel lining cluster. However, since the stiffness of the dummy plate (EA and EI) is factored down by a large factor (e.g. 103 - 105 times), the calculated forces should be scaled back up with the same factor. This entails some result post-processing which is summed up below:

    • tunnel lining
    • PLAXIS
    • Tunnel
    • PLAXIS 2D
    • tunnel designer
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Stefanos Papavasileiou Created by Bentley Colleague Stefanos Papavasileiou
    • When: Mon, Dec 14 2020 5:54 AM
    • Micha van der Sloot Last revision by Bentley Colleague Micha van der Sloot
    • When: Thu, Dec 16 2021 6:04 AM
    • Revisions: 3
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies