Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • Welcome
  • Products
  • Support
  • About
  • More
  • Cancel
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
  • Product Communities
GeoStudio | PLAXIS
GeoStudio | PLAXIS Wiki Deconfinement feature might generate wrong stress distribution for dry conditions
    • Sign In
    • -Geotechnical Analysis Wiki
      • +GeoStudio
      • -PLAXIS
        • +Software and License - PLAXIS
        • +Documentation - PLAXIS
        • +API / Python scripting - PLAXIS
        • -Known issues - PLAXIS
          • -Solved issues - PLAXIS
            • PLAXIS 2D meshing stops with error Ordinal 747 not located
            • 1D Site Response Analysis does not work in non-English versions
            • Deconfinement method gives unexpected results in case of pore water pressure change in PLAXIS 2D
            • PLAXIS LE importer incorrectly converts geometry when having comma as decimal symbol
            • Deconfinement feature might generate wrong stress distribution for dry conditions
            • PLAXIS Design Approach partial factor not applied to material parameters when loading older files
            • Tunnel beams/girders generated in the wrong direction
            • Geogrids may trigger a Run-time kernel error [256]
            • PLAXIS Calculation Manager does not save in PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V22.00
            • 2D 2017.01: Drawing area not updated with small tunnel arc segments
            • 2D AE.00: A project may fail to load when the model contains imported geometry
            • 2D Consolidation phase does not calculate
            • 2D structural forces in volumes: incorrect results for axisymmetric models
            • 2D2010: (External) Water loads on plates coming from inactive clusters
            • 2D2011.00: Anisotropic plate properties taken as isotropic
            • 2D2011.00: Default pore pressure calculation is taken from the previous phase instead from the parent phase
            • 2D2011.02: Error when adding a curve from another project
            • 2D2011: (External) water loads wrongly applied during safety and dynamic calculations
            • 2D2011: Continued time-history signal over multiple dynamic phases may give wrong results
            • 2D2012.0: External water pressures missing on a line with interfaces in transient flow
            • 2D2012.0: older projects with volume strains cannot be opened on systems with comma as decimal separator
            • 2D2012.0: Phase settings copied unintentionally to other phase
            • 2D: cannot delete a closed flow boundary
            • 2DAE Post-calc curve points are not removed when remeshing
            • 2DAE: Degree of consolidation calculation type does not stop at specified value
            • 2DAE: Drawing a closed flow boundary does not automatically close the boundary
            • 2DAE: Error message when closing Input on Windows 8.0
            • 2DAE: Issues with automatic dynamic substeps determination
            • 3D AE report generator may fail with tables for anchors or drains
            • 3D Beam: wrong plot for bending moments
            • 3D Custom Connections with multiple plate sections may give unexpected results
            • 3D Jointed Rock uses incorrect E1 and E2
            • 3D2011.00 Groundwater flow does not take the volume-dry-setting into account
            • 3D2011: Not possible to use Hoek-Brown material model in Safety phase
            • 3D2012.00: intersection of curved surface with (curved) surface can give wrong results
            • 3D2013 Output program could stop responding for viewing results
            • 3D: Interface flips side after intersection with coinciding surfaces
            • Accidental inaccurate results in PLAXIS 3D with large incremental multiplier Mstage
            • Active pore water stresses and total stresses incorrect in interfaces for Undrained C material
            • Anisotropic permeability in 3D 2011 groundwaterflow gives incorrect results
            • API Scripting Error: Missing owner object for property object
            • Available models in the Sensitivity analysis and parameter variation
            • Beam and embedded pile structural forces not correct after a Target SumMsf Safety calculation
            • Beams connected to soil by one node start with zero displacements
            • Bending moments of tunnels
            • Borehole water settings in calculation phases
            • Calculation cannot handle phase 100
            • Calculation does not run with 16 cores or more
            • Cannot change local axes for 3D surfaces
            • Cannot select force envelopes in the 2D2010 report generator
            • Cannot start PLAXIS 3D Input after declining the Plaxis disclaimer
            • Cannot use a computer with 16 cores or more
            • Changing embedded pile connection type might be not taken into account in the calculation
            • Changing temperature unit in Chinese/Japanese Windows OS will give an error
            • Circular tunnel with inside interface cannot be meshed
            • Combination of gravity loading with prescribed displacement does not work in 2D AE
            • Combining dynamic phases with other phases with a time interval may give incorrect results
            • Concrete model in 2D 2018.00 swaps horizontal stresses each step
            • Concrete model in 3D 2018 exhibits no creep deformations
            • Confusing representation of structural element numbers in input and output
            • Connections made in 3D AE give access violation error in 3D 2016.00
            • Connections with three or more plate sections give incorrect results
            • Consistent use of PLAXIS Output
            • Consolidation boundaries with deactivated top soil volumes
            • Consolidation flow through interface on top surface
            • Consolidation phase fails in model with 15-noded elements
            • Consolidation phase may fail in model with 15-noded elements and interfaces
            • Consolidation TPP: Activating a cluster and changing its water conditions
            • Continue a cancelled calculation phase
            • Conversion issues of 2D Version 9 phases to 2D 2011.02
            • Copying thermal properties from the Global material database
            • Crash after adding phases in 3D 2016 to projects made in PLAXIS 3D AE
            • Crash in Report Generator while Embedded Beam Row material is included
            • Crash of Hoek-Brown model during PLAXIS 3D 64-bit calculations
            • Custom level water condition might be reset after loading
            • Default boundary conditions for PLAXIS 3D AE.00 may be applied incorrectly
            • Deformed mesh plot of plates and geogrids uses offset of interface nodes
            • Degree of consolidation phase does not automatically take pore pressures from previous phase
            • Degree of saturation is shown as 0% for undrained layers when p_active > 0
            • Design approaches 2D2012: only use one design approach per project
            • Design Approaches: Load factor not always shown in Explorers
            • Design Approaches: partial factor on anchors not always taken into account
            • Drawing a waterlevel in PLAXIS 2D AE always snaps to the grid
            • Dynamic loads not correctly applied in phase with multiple dynamic substeps
            • Dynamic models with Rayleigh damping in bottom layer may give wrong results
            • Editing an existing soil material dataset via copy+paste is not saved
            • Elastoplastic geogrid material datasets from 2D 2016 turn Elastic in 2D 2017
            • Embedded pile connections in combination with interfaces
            • Embedded pile row connections with interfaces in PLAXIS 2D2012.01
            • Embedded pile row forces not correct in a Target SumMsf Safety calculation
            • Embedded piles/beams and consolidation
            • Equivalent hoop forces in axisymmetric models are not considered in the Forces View equilibrium table
            • Error when generating charts in 2D 2010.01
            • Excess pore pressure in plate and interface are zero
            • Excess pore pressure is doubled at the start of a transient groundwater flow of a semi-coupled analysis
            • Excess pore pressures in the unsaturated zone are too low
            • External phreatic level i.c.w. plates and/or interfaces on surface
            • External water loads on a cantilevered plate after groundwater flow in 2D AE
            • External water pressures are missing on surfaces with inactive interfaces
            • External water pressures on structures above the soil incorrect in 2D CONNECT Edition V20 [Solved]
            • External water pressures on structures above the soil incorrect in 2DAE.00
            • External waterloads in updated water pressure calculation may be wrong
            • External waterloads on a structure may not be correct in a flow calculation
            • First data line in Dynamic SMC file is skipped
            • Fixed end anchor properties reset to initial settings after meshing
            • Forces in plates using elastoplastic M-kappa diagram not correct in a Target SumMsf Safety calculation
            • Free field boundaries without compliant base bottom may turn into viscous boundaries
            • Fully coupled flow and staged construction issue
            • Gravity value not correct with non-metric units in Plaxis 2D without Dynamics licence
            • Groundwater flow calculation i.c.w. dry clusters may give wrong results
            • Groundwater flow results after a consolidation analysis (EPP)
            • Hoek-Brown mobilized dilatancy evolution not as documented
            • Ignore suction in Fully coupled flow-deformation analysis
            • Ignoring suction after a fully coupled flow-deformation analysis in Safety analysis gives incorrect stresses in PLAXIS 2D [Solved]
            • Incorrect external water pressures could be applied inside a tunnel (PLAXIS 3D AE)
            • Incorrect interface active pore pressures
            • Incorrect interface pore pressures after groundwater flow
            • Incorrect results when rotation springs are used
            • Incorrect rounding of small values (e.g. permeability) when using Sensitivity Analysis
            • Incorrect smoothing of structural forces in (curved) plates
            • Incorrect unsaturated Van Genuchten parameter values for Hypres Topsoil Medium fine
            • Incorrect visualization of bending moment in 2D AE Input
            • Incorrect visualization of local axes for imported and/or curved 3D surfaces
            • Incorrect visualization of multiple points loads in PLAXIS 2D 2015
            • Initial stress conditions (K0) in Sensitivity analysis and Parameter Variation
            • Initial stresses in newly activated clusters unexpectedly influenced by POP
            • Input of wave velocities with non-default or non-metric values for the gravity may give wrong results
            • Interface around circular tunnel may take material from wrong side
            • Interpolate pore pressure option may give bug report during 3D calculation
            • Interpolate pore pressures on volumes with vertical sides may give incorrect pore pressure distribution for PLAXIS 3D
            • Interpolate pore pressures with an inclined top cluster boundary does not work correctly in 2DAE.00
            • Interpolated pore pressures in interfaces might be incorrect
            • Invalid saved views gives error in Output
            • Issue with search field in Command Reference
            • Iterative settings for dynamics phases may contain settings for groundwater flow
            • Layer dependent skin resistance of embedded beam row ignores spacing
            • Line and surface contraction value [Solved]
            • Linear distribution for line loads and prescribed line displacements defined in 2DAE's Tunnel Designer do not work
            • Load factor not applied to bending moment in PLAXIS 2D AE
            • Local axis may flip with overlapping lines in PLAXIS 2D AE
            • Manual Axis function for lines leads to crash while loading the model in PLAXIS 3D 2016.00
            • Maximum anchor force is not divided by spacing
            • Maximum value bulk modulus water not correct (relevant for undrained, consolidation and flow calculations)
            • Maximum value bulk modulus water not correct when using non-metric length unit (relevant for 3D undrained, consolidation and flow analysis)
            • Maximum value bulk modulus water not correct when using non-metric units (relevant for undrained, consolidation and flow analysis)
            • Mix up of state parameters in Output with multiple (user defined) soil models
            • Modified Cam Clay parameters in PLAXIS SensiPar
            • Moment load display in PLAXIS 2D 2018.00 Output not correct
            • Multiple geogrid materials can cause incorrect Plaxis data
            • Not possible to move user water level by mouse
            • Objects names with special Unicode characters may fail in meshing [Solved]
            • Permeability value change not stored when changing from From data set to None [Solved]
            • Plastic behaviour in free field elements in PLAXIS 3D AE.00 may lead to a severe divergence error
            • Plastic Points History plots cannot be added in report generation
            • PLAXIS 2012 and Windows 8
            • PLAXIS 2D 2010 does not save correctly when using non-Latin characters
            • PLAXIS 2D 2018.00: Interface plastic points are not available
            • PLAXIS 2D Classic Report Generator does not generate a report
            • PLAXIS 2D Soiltest Inverse analysis
            • Plaxis 2D2012.00 Soiltest Parameter optimisation issues
            • PLAXIS 2DAE model view may be hidden when working in maximized window with high resolution
            • PLAXIS 3D 2018 may not always properly load a model after intersection issues
            • PLAXIS 3D Dynamic free field elements and its corners
            • PLAXIS calculation does not run when free disk space > 2 TB
            • PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V21 calculation does not start due to a license issue [SOLVED]
            • PLAXIS Connect: proxy servers
            • Point load not taken into account on top of embedded pile row if surrounding soil is deactivated
            • Point reference for load system and prescribed displacement not always correct
            • Points outside of geometric boundaries may have strange behaviour in 2D AE and 2D 2015
            • Pore pressures in interfaces may be incorrect with Interpolate pore pressures
            • Possible data loss due to the Output report generator for user defined report folders
            • Possible incorrect cohesion increment for Soft Soil and Soft Soil creep
            • Possible incorrect visualisation of external water loads for 3D flow calculation
            • Possible over-estimation of lateral circular pile bearing capacity
            • Power spectrum and amplification function
            • Prescribed displacements are taken as additional phase displacements
            • Prestress force for anchors may not always be applied to a plate element in PLAXIS 3D 2018
            • PSA plot not correct when combining multiple dynamic phases
            • Re-applying same material in stages by a command reports: Tried executing, but failed
            • Replacing a LE or MC material set with an advanced material set unexpectedly gives OCR = 1.25
            • Report generator issue with Material information when different material types for plates and anchors used in projects
            • Report generator on Japanese and Chinese Windows versions generate corrupted RTF
            • Results may not be correct for undrained excavations while using a cavitation cut off in PLAXIS 2D2011.02
            • Safety analysis after fully coupled flow-deformation analysis uses incorrect pore pressures
            • Safety analysis: Ignore undrained behaviour cannot be deactivated
            • Saturation is 0% for phreatic level calculations in PLAXIS 3D 2011.00
            • SciTE issues when running a Python script
            • Sensitivity analysis does not give results for the criterion Factor of Safety
            • Some Input tables and Output results may not consider project units in PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V22 [V22.01]
            • Splitting dynamic signal over multiple phases may give wrong results when using compliant base boundary
            • Staged construction/Flow condition settings might not be loaded correctly in 2D 2017
            • Steady state groundwater flow results may be wrong for models with seepage boundaries and low permeable soils
            • Structural forces from automatic centerline might be incorrect in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00
            • Structural results are not included in 2D2011.00's generated report
            • Structural tables for a safety value show no values in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00
            • Switching between Classical and Advanced mode switches Suction cut-off on/off in an unexpected manner
            • Thermal strain incorrectly includes thermal expansion of water in PLAXIS 2D 2016.00
            • Thermosyphon boundary option is not fully documented in 2D 2016/2D 2017
            • Time interval specified for K0 phase (using Gravity loading first) incorrectly influences dynamic results
            • Total pore pressures and total stresses plot may not be correct for undrained excavations in PLAXIS 2D2012.00
            • Transient groundwater flow analysis is reset to steady state after changing the calculation type
            • Tunnel designer loses material assignments after loading project in 3D 2018
            • Tunnel properties seem lost when opening a project created in 2D 2015 or earlier
            • Tutorials 15 and 16 produce slightly different results with PLAXIS 2D 2016.01
            • Unable to access corrupted material database with thermal properties
            • Unable to activate interfaces in water conditions mode for Undrained B materials
            • Unexpected behaviour of default fixities in PLAXIS 3D
            • Updated mesh + updated water pressures for deactivated clusters beneath general phreatic level gives wrong external waterloads
            • Updated mesh in 3D Safety analysis incorrectly updates the geometry
            • Updated water pressure does not work in 2DAE.00
            • Use of "Line Search" option may give incorrect results
            • Use pressures from previous phase-option gives wrong pore pressures after changing the previous phase
            • User defined soil model dll not recognized in PLAXIS 2D AE Soiltest
            • Using non-default or non-metric gravity values gives wrong results for 3D dynamic calculations
            • Visibility issues when loading 3D2013 projects in PLAXIS 3D AE.00
            • Visualization issue of embedded beam connections in Staged Construction in PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V22.00
            • Visualization of interface permeability setting in PLAXIS 2D AE
            • Volume strain could be activated unexpectedly
            • Volumetric strain in Updated Mesh not presented correctly
            • Water weight only updated in the initial phase
          • +Unresolved issues - PLAXIS
        • +Models - PLAXIS
        • +Tips and Tricks
        • +Publications
        • +Videos - PLAXIS
      • +PLAXIS Monopile Designer
      • +PLAXIS LE
      • +SOILVISION
      • +Geotechnical SELECT Entitlements [GSE]
      • +Subscription Entitlement Service

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Deconfinement feature might generate wrong stress distribution for dry conditions

    Application PLAXIS 2D
    Issue status Ballot box with check Solved
    First Affected Version PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V20 Update 4
    Found in Version PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V20 Update 4
    PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V21
    Fixed and Released in Version PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V22.00
    Issue # 669296
    Date created 19 July 2021
    Date modified 19 January 2022

    Problem description

    In PLAXIS 2D it is possible to enter a Deconfinement value during staged construction (as 1- β) in the model explorer. Doing this enables part of the stresses (β) in the soil polygon inside the tunnel to be retained as a support pressure. 

    Figure 1. Deconfinement feature in Selection explorer

    However, when the general water level is below the tunnel where the deconfinement feature will be used, and the soil polygon is not set as “dry”, a wrong stress distribution will be generated in PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V20 Update 4 and PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V21, leading to inaccurate calculation results. 

    The image below is a comparison of the stress distribution from a construction phase with a deconfinement of 30%, and with a construction phase with ΣMstage = 0.3. Since this only simulates the excavation of the tunnel, the stress distribution of both phases should be the same.

     Figure 2. Computed cartesian stresses using ΣMstage and Deconfinement options

    Note that a similar issue with the deconfinement method when a tunnel was subjected to pore water pressure changes in PLAXIS 2D is fixed since PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition Update 4.
    For further information regarding this please refer to:
    https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/50563/deconfinement-method-gives-unexpected-results-in-case-of-pore-water-pressure-change-in-plaxis-2d


    It is important to highlight that the present issue only occurs when dry and semi-dry conditions are considered, and therefore it is not related to the aforementioned case.

    Solution

    This issue is resolved since PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V22.00

    As a workaround, for PLAXIS 2D CONNECT Edition V20.04/V21 it is required to manually set the deactivated soil polygon of the tunnel to “Dry” water conditions. This will enforce proper support pressure during partial deconfinement.

    The image below illustrates how to set the selected soil polygon as “Dry” in Staged construction. Please note that it is required to check if these settings are correct in the subsequent phases.

    Figure 3. Assigning "Dry" water condition to a soil polygon

    By setting the water condition of the tunnel soil polygon to “Dry”, the same stress distribution is obtained.

    Figure 4. Computed cartesian stresses with the suggested workaround 

    • Groundwater
    • PLAXIS
    • deconfinement
    • Tunnel
    • PLAXIS 2D
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Stefanos Papavasileiou Created by Bentley Colleague Stefanos Papavasileiou
    • When: Mon, Jul 19 2021 5:37 AM
    • Micha van der Sloot Last revision by Bentley Colleague Micha van der Sloot
    • When: Wed, Jan 19 2022 8:49 AM
    • Revisions: 4
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies