This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Surge Tank Headloss Coefficient

Hello good morning;

I am modeling a surge tank to protect a pipe for transient event.

When I dont consider headloss coefficient ( Headloss coefficient = 0) tthe system works normally but when I consider a headloss coefficient different to 0 (always positive), HAMMMER dont compute. 

Additional Surge Tank input data:

  • Operating Range type: elevation
  • Elevation (Base): 726.91
  • Elevation (Minimum): 726.91
  • Elevation initial:731
  • Elevation (Maximum):734

  • Elevation (physical): 726.46
  • Volume(inactive): 0
  • Section: Circular
  • Diameter (m): 0.10 (it is a 4" stand pipe)
  • Treat as Juction: True

  • Surge Tank Type: Simple
  • Has check valve: False
  • Weir coefficient:1.84
  • Weir Length: 0.5 m
  • Diamter orifice (mm): 100
  • Ratios of losses:2.5
  • Headloss coefficient: ?

  • The pipe is a 450 mm diameter ductil Iron (lenght 6100m) with a flow of 100 l/s 
  • Reservoir elevation: 731.23m
  • Valve close time:120 seg.

Where do you think is the error? Maybe the little diameter of the onlet and surge tank (4"=0.1m = 100mm) 

Thank you very much for your support

Kind regards.

 

  • Hello Gustavo, what version of HAMMER are you using? (you can check under File > Help > About, or Help > About for older versions). There was a similar issue in version 10.01.01.04 but I am not certain if it an exact match to the issue you're describing. If you're on version 10.01.01.04 or earlier, are you able to upgrade? can you provide a copy of the model for us to test in the older and newer versions?


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

  • Hello Jesse and thank you for you help.

    The version of hammer I am using is HAMMER Connect Edition Update 2 - 22/04/2019 10.02.01.06 64-bit

    In order to solve the problem, I have been trying differents diameters of the Surge Tank and Inlet Orifice and when I put something more normal (1 m. instead of 0.1m (surge tank) and 250mm instead of 100mm. (inlet orifice)) it works with a headloss coefficient diferent to 0 (positive). the problem is that i am checking a design and they projected a 0.1m Surge tank with 100 mm inlet orifice.

    Anyway, if you show me the better way to send you the model, I ll send you.

    Thank you. 

    Kind Regards.

  • Hi Gustavo,

    Ok, this type of issue can indeed occur when the solver encounter extreme conditions which can be due to unusual model input. It may be a combination of the very small orifice size, small tank diameter, and possibly other parameters. It may be having trouble converging if the water level is changing quickly due to the small size. However, I experimented with one of the example models and was not able to reproduce the issue.

    Have you tried a smaller calculation timestep? If that does not help, please send the model and we will take a look.

    In general if you do have a 4" standpipe that "floats" on the system during normal operating conditions and can supply some volume of water during a surge event, then it does sound like your approach here with the surge tank makes sense.


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

  • Hi Jesse:

    Attached I send you the model in order you can take a look.

    TRAMO I Bentley Communities.wtgpkg.wtgpkg.zip

    Thank you very much for your help.

  • Hi Gustavo,

    why do you provide 2 surge tanks? do you really need that?

    why the air valves (air inflow diameter) and (air outflow diameter) has the same values?

    do you need an air valve near the reservoir?

    is the reservoir with 731m presenting a pump head? I noticed that the minimum elevation is around 661 m; did you run the system as an initial condition?

    The system demand is 100 L/s and you are using pipe Ø450mm; is that the condition you have?

    is the graph of the closing valve reflect what will happen; i.e check the values.

    All Air valves are treated as junctions?

    The vapor pressure in the calculation options (-20 bars)? and check other parameters 

    Regards...Mohamad.